Should Christianity reach out to the LGBT community?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Robert_Sock
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
R

Robert_Sock

Guest
If so, how? They are certainly going through great trials and are in need of spiritual and religious guidance. I believe that church leaders of all denominations should openly state that members of the LGBT community are to be welcomed with genuine love without actually condoning the behavior. Even if members of the LGBT community do not choose to accept the invitation, at least they will know that we are here to help them and that we are not prejudiced against them.
 
Yes but for many in the last two or three years, you’re not reaching out to them if you require them to be celibate and state that marriage as a union between a man and a woman only. Before 2012 I remember most opinions I’ve read on Christians reaching out to LGBT would not consider those to be requirements of what it means to be inclusive and reaching out to them.
With that in mind, for parishes and congregations that treat LGBT people like anyone else I don’t think there is much else that can do. Obviously those who say very hurtful things should repent.
 
Jesus would eat with them, but would have the same words for them as he did for the woman caught in adultery.
 
I believe that church leaders of all denominations should openly state that members of the LGBT community are to be welcomed with genuine love without actually condoning the behavior.
The end result of trying to shoehorn a liberal political issue into (for the most part) conservative and moderate religious communities can only end ugly.

Being “transgendered” is a psychological issue. Abetting a person in a mental delusion is not helpful.
 
-Yes

-I’m not sure how

-I once heard that the safest place in the world for someone in the LGBT community was the Catholic Church. If that’s true then we need to start to act like it…
 
I would say no to reaching out to the LGBT “community”, but yes to reaching out to LGBT individuals. You’re never going to convince the LGBT community on Catholic doctrines on homosexuality, but you can have constructive dialogue with individuals. Any attempt to reach out to the LGBT community as a whole would ultimately fruitless and would likely backfire. I would also avoid terms such as “inclusive” and “accepting”. These terms mean different things to the LGBT community and individuals than they would mean to the Church.
 
Of course! All sinners, i.e. all humans, are in God’s call, and are loved by Him. We are called to see Christ in their, and all faces.
 
I would say no to reaching out to the LGBT “community”, but yes to reaching out to LGBT individuals. You’re never going to convince the LGBT community on Catholic doctrines on homosexuality, but you can have constructive dialogue with individuals. Any attempt to reach out to the LGBT community as a whole would ultimately fruitless and would likely backfire. I would also avoid terms such as “inclusive” and “accepting”. These terms mean different things to the LGBT community and individuals than they would mean to the Church.
Yeah, this is a pretty good point. Pretty much reflects my views as well.
 
Several of the mainline Protestant branches of Christianity already are.
 
Is a gay Catholic who sleeps around a worse sinner than a married heterosexual Catholic who sleeps around? What about a celibate gay Catholic as opposed to a celibate heterosexual Catholic, is one a worse sinner than the other?

Everyone sins. Gays and lesbians are no worse sinners than you or I. If individuals approach your parish they should be treated with respect and dignity.

Not sold on a specific LGBT outreach because they can be hostile to religious people, many have had bad experiences with religious people. It gets too confrontational.
 
I would say no to reaching out to the LGBT “community”, but yes to reaching out to LGBT individuals. You’re never going to convince the LGBT community on Catholic doctrines on homosexuality, but you can have constructive dialogue with individuals. Any attempt to reach out to the LGBT community as a whole would ultimately fruitless and would likely backfire. I would also avoid terms such as “inclusive” and “accepting”. These terms mean different things to the LGBT community and individuals than they would mean to the Church.
I was hired by a prominent leader of the gay community, a law professor with tons of research money, to conduct research in gay rights. He knew I was a devout Catholic but he did not seem to mind a bit. Anyway, I got to know him and I got the impression that he would welcome outreach from Christianity even though select individuals have a deep disdain towards Christianity. I think the better-educated community leaders would welcome dialog with Christianity, even though Christianity does not condone the behavior. I believe that Christianity can help select individuals and the community leaders would recognize and welcome this.
 
Yes there should be a dedicated ministry outreach to LGBT people. One of the biggest issues and misconceptions is that many within the LGBT community feel Christians feel them as the worst of the worst and basically one can be either Christian or LGBT (in this I’m meaning experience same sex attraction or have gender dysphoria and not referring to any particular actions). Christians, in all honesty, have done a terrible job and the mentality out there is US vs THEM when dealing with this issue, particularly with certain high profile Christians often calling LGBT child predators, blaming all of society ills on them, and often implying experiencing particular temptations as a choice.

The biggest help for reaching out would simply be this. To listen to their stories and to just talk. To often, the approach to LGBT is to make sure they are aware of DON’T DO THIS and the message stops there as if that is the job well done. The message almost always stops at don’t do this and never really about other aspects of the gospel so it can be rather discouraging (particularly in our society that idolatries romance and romantic relationships while devaluing friendship so much). Once a line of communication and rapport is established with the LGBT person, then I think it is good to go into and probe their understanding of Catholic doctrine and ethics regarding various things including sexual ethics. A good source for them to read is to see celibate gay people who live within a traditional ethic: so movies like Desire of Ever Lasting Hills (here: vimeo.com/101135437), The Third Way (here: vimeo.com/93079367), “Washed and Waiting” by Wesley Hill, and the blog spiritualfriendship.org are all good sources.

One final note is to help break this idolatry of romance and marriage. Within our society the implication is to have love, you must be within a romantic relationship and to be single is to be without love (this is even further pushed in some Christian circles where marriage is viewed as the only Godly pathway to fullfilment). With this faulty perspective, a gay person is going to see their options as pursue love within a romantic relationship or choose faith and give up the idea of having any love or support. This faulty perspective completely ignores the love, support, and intimacy that can be found within friendship. However, this perspective is not uncommon and makes choosing a celibate life very difficult; especially when many people around you begin to couple off, start families, and suddenly have less and less time for the single person who ends up feeling like the odd man out. Lack of support for a celibate vocation is a major reason why many end up rationalizing things that are not in accordance with church teaching (i.e. enter into a same sex relationship anyway because of the loneliness or a straight person who remarries despite being divorced and unable to receive an annulment).

One final final note is that there is unfortunately more often than I like homophobic comments that I have heard from parishioners in the various churches I have attended that have ranged from disgust when LGBT issues come up, accusations of LGBT as all mentally unstable, accusations of all LGBT as future threats to children, insunuations that a person with same sex attraction is somehow less of a Christian (i.e. 'good Christians don’t suffer from that), among other things. Not to mention frequent questions about dating life, marriage, etc which a celibate gay/ssa person has to deflect and ultimately ends up feeling very alienated from. Most seem blissfully unaware that there are LGBT/ssa people who do attend church services and these type of comments are the kind that are very discouraging and lead to them losing hope and eventually walking away from the faith sadly.

All of this perspective is coming from me, a mid-20s celibate gay/ssa Catholic guy so that is the life experiences and perspective I come from.
 
I think Jesus wants us to reach out to all. And I think that’s pretty simple.

Now, are they living in sin? Here I throw my hands up and and say it’s between God and that person. I don’t feel qualified to judge. I try to follow Jesus’ example of kindness. I guess that’s all I can think to say on it.
 
Of course we should, and do.

The Church reaches out to all people. Look at the groups who need serious spiritual help. Men and women who abuse pornography check in at a far higher number than those in the LGBT community. They need Christ as much as anyone else. The Church exists to save souls, and help people turn away from their sins. What the best approach to do this can be debated. Some believe simply accepting as they are (you know so and so is actively homosexual, you know so and so is having an affair behind his wife’s back) will create a feeling of love from the new community and eventually, the path of a more righteous opportunity will dawn on them. Other believe we are best not to coddle people in order to help them turn away from sin, while still being kind to them.

I think individuals react differently to different tactics. I need a blunt assessment of my shortcomings from my wife or a Priest to get serious about a change. Others do not react that way,🤷
 
Yep.

If they don’t listen shake the dust off your feet.
In studying attitude formation and change, research has shown that there can very often be a sleeper effect. Just because our religious influence does not have an immediate effect, which I would expect, does not mean that they will not use the positive influence at a later time.
 
In studying attitude formation and change, research has shown that there can very often be a sleeper effect. Just because our religious influence does not have an immediate effect, which I would expect, does not mean that they will not use the positive influence at a later time.
The advice I posted was the advice Jesus gave to His disciples. Our job as Christians is to instruct the ignorant. The rest is up to that person.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top