T
TheosisM
Guest
If the Mormons should have been mentioned, then why not the Jehovah’s Witnesses, the Christadelphians, the Christian Scientists,and all the other groups that have sprung up throughout history.? What about the sedevacantists? I believe that the Catechism was using Muslims as an example (a 1 billion member example) of how non-Catholics can be saved as well. Of course, if they are, it is through the blood of Christ.In my opinion, the Catechism of the Catholic Church reflects post–conciliar Catholicism, the spirit of which seemingly rejects the triumphalism that was often characteristic of the Catholic Church prior to Vatican II, but which still occasionally surfaces as evidenced by the fact that some Catholics openly declare that Latter–day Saints aren’t Christians. I had been surmising that the spirit of Vatican II might have been directed toward the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter–day Saints in the same way that it has been directed toward Islam. Paragraph 841 of the Catechism of the Catholic Church states:
So it occurred to me that if the Catholic Church saw fit to portray Muslims in a positive light in the Catechism of the Catholic Church perhaps Latter–day Saints might have gotten a good write–up, also, especially considering that Muslims completely reject Jesus Christ and Latter–day Saints include Him in their nomenclature.
Still, apparently I was much mistaken. Thanks for your help, though.
Appreciatively,
Mick
![]()
So, the Catholic Church would see Mormons in the same way that we see Muslims. Mormons can be saved as well. They don’t have to be mentioned by name for this to apply (otherwise every other church and religion, especially those larger than Mormonism, would have to be mentioned as well, using this logic). Whether or not the Church sees Mormonism as Christian doesn’t really mean that it is not possible for them to be saved through Jesus Christ.
And of course we have always believed that the fullness of Truth is found only in the Catholic Church.
Hope that helps.