C
Charlemagne_III
Guest
From the* Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court*:
“In the seminal 1942 case of Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, the Supreme Court established the rationale that distinguishes protected and unprotected speech. Obscenity and lewdness, libel, and fighting words are not protected speech by the First Amendment because ‘such expressions are no essential part of any expression of ideas, and are of such slight social value as a step to truth that any benefit that may be derived from them is clearly outweighed by the social interest in order and morality.’”
Now that Supreme Court had it right!
“In the seminal 1942 case of Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, the Supreme Court established the rationale that distinguishes protected and unprotected speech. Obscenity and lewdness, libel, and fighting words are not protected speech by the First Amendment because ‘such expressions are no essential part of any expression of ideas, and are of such slight social value as a step to truth that any benefit that may be derived from them is clearly outweighed by the social interest in order and morality.’”
Now that Supreme Court had it right!
