M
mcrow
Guest
The problem is that non-Catholics have only one definition of Worship. I don’t see how going on about latin and linguistics helps annyone in this discussion. Perhaps if someone is taking Theology or extensively studying the Church and scrpiture as part of higher education or research purposes it can be helpful.So, rather than educate non-Catholics so they are no longer confused, we should just ignore the reality of the term so we don’t confuse (even though they are the ones already confused), in spite of the the fact that it is, and has been, a teaching of the Church for centuries? (LOL…now I’m confused! :ehh
Also, I believe I addressed the “culturally accepted” use of the term when I mentioned it’s rightful use in England, unless by “culturally accepted” you mean what you personally accept culturally. Yes, there are differences both culturally and semantically between Catholics and Protestants. But most of those have stemmed from American culture. The Catholic Church is universal…worldwide. So “culturally” is broader.
But, yes…as Protestants wrongly understand the term “worship” as only “Latria”, we Catholics do not “Latria” Worship Mary…end of story.![]()
To the average person who’s looking into becoming Cathilic, and has a small base of knowledge on the subject, something as advanced as this is not helpful. All it will probably accomplish is confusing someone who’s already neck deep in learning the basics of the Catholic Church (which are quite extensive compared to non-Catholic churches).
All I’m saying is lets not add in any further points of confussion for people new to the Catholic faith.