Should Islamic head coverings be banned in public?

  • Thread starter Thread starter IHF
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
In Canada we call the traditional Nun headwear and clothing “a habit” or “the habit”.

The habit cannot be worn in any public place in North America and Europe. I think you two should know this.

Now please stay on topic and weigh in on the original question please.
I’m sorry, but that is a load of garbage and patently not true. I am a student in one of the most liberal college towns in the USA. In the same city, there is a rapidly growing convent of nuns who dress in full-length white habits and black veils. I’ve rode the campus and buses with some of these nuns.

I probably shouldn’t feed the troll, right? :rolleyes:
 
In Canada we call the traditional Nun headwear and clothing “a habit” or “the habit”.

The habit cannot be worn in any public place in North America and Europe. I think you two should know this.

Now please stay on topic and weigh in on the original question please.
I never heard of such a thing. It’s certainly not banned in the USA.
 
Hrm…I could have sworn that I read this someplace…recently.

Didn’t they ban the original Nun outfit?

Anyway’s, I’ll wait for my next chance to bash these liberals…
Oh goody, more opinions sans knowledge!
 
I can see that you are trying to hijack my thread.

Please explain to me where you have seen the habit worn recently?

In schools? Hospitals? They are banned in those places.

So instead of hijacking my thread please answer the original question.
Let me say this kindely

You’re full of ****

Have a nice day:thumbsup:
 
Hrm…I could have sworn that I read this someplace…recently.

Didn’t they ban the original Nun outfit?

Anyway’s, I’ll wait for my next chance to bash these liberals…
No, not even almost close.

The Hijab is banned in certian public institutions like Turkey and France.
 
While many nuns are “out of the habit” it is not illegal to wear in public in North America (Mexico is a possible exception) or Europe. Ms. Merkls comments were not an attack on the habit but an attempt to appease Muslims.
 
It’s obvious this poster is merely looking for something to “bash liberals” with, without even bothering to verify the information. This is the kind of nonsense that allows the opponents of Traditionalists to smear all Traditionalists with the same brush – that they are knee-jerk liberal-conspiracy theorists. And I know not all Traditionalists are of a piece.
I don’t think so. One poster above gave a link to German attempts to ban Islamic head scarves. I know that it has been proposed and is perhaps the law in France. European countries with a large influx of observant Muslims are frustrated because they are slow to assimulate which appears to cause problems. Public schools in Bavaria often had or have crucifixes on the class room walls. There were recent objections to that as well. There genuinely are parts of the world that are troubled by the display or wearing of garb that is either religious or which appears to be irreligious; western clothing on women in some Muslim nations.
 
Let’s get this right. Let’s define North America.

North America = Greenland (Denmark), Canada, USA, Mexico, and Caribbean.

Where, besides Mexico and Cuba are religious clothing banned?

There is not such law in the USA. I don’t know about Canada or Denmark. There is not such law in the Caribbean nations.

Why would we want to ban Muslim garments if Christians and Jews are allowed to wear religious garb. Isn’t a yamulke a religious piece of clothing?

I grew up Jewish and converted at age 20. I always wore a yamulke (kippah). Sometimes I still wear it in public, when its appropriate or expected, just like Brother Bob Fishman on EWTN.

The Daughters of Charity run Providence Hospital in Washington DC. They wear their blue.

The Franciscans in our parish wear their habits when it’s cool enough.

The Orthodox Jews here wear their kippahs everywhere, not just for holy days.

No, religious garb is not forbidden for anyone iin he USA so why should Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists and other eastern religions be targeted?

It’s unconstitutional and also un-Catholic.

JR 🙂
Greenland (Denmark)??? North America??? How do you figure that’s North America? I haven’t read the whole thread already, so this may be addressed, but I’ll never find it again or forget about it if I don’t do this now.
 
Greenland (Denmark)??? North America??? How do you figure that’s North America? I haven’t read the whole thread already, so this may be addressed, but I’ll never find it again or forget about it if I don’t do this now.
Greenland is an autonomous part of Denmark, but geographically it is part of North America – same as St-Pierre et Miquelon (an overseas department of France, but only a few km off the coast of Newfoundland).
 
As the Catholic habit is banned.

From what I understand, the Catholic habit is banned as it is deemed religious.

I want to know why the hijab, niqab and burka are allowed in public as these are also religious and not to mention offensive to many more people then would find the Catholic habit same offensively.

This is a clear double standard to me…
I don’t think that either the hijab or Catholic habit should be banned. Maybe I am odd but I think some of the women who I see with head coverings look very pretty.

As far as hiding one’s face, as long as they expose their face for things like a driver’s license, I don’t have any problem with that either.🤷
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top