G
General
Guest
gnat:
How do you know?Jesus isn’t some early Judge who cares about if we are wearing a suit or not.
How do you know?Jesus isn’t some early Judge who cares about if we are wearing a suit or not.
Go to a nice Catholic thrift store and spend $.50-5.00 on a nice blouse to go with your dress slacks for summer Masses – that will be FAR more appropriate than shorts and a sleeveless shirt.Exactly. My dress shorts certainly are not immodest or scandalous. I’m not wearing my gym shorts or my spaghetti strap tanks. I’m wearing very nice dress shorts with a very nice blouse that happens to be sleeveless (but very nice and dressy). I don’t own a “formal” thing, except for 1 sparkly holiday cocktail dress that is far more immodest than my shorts!
I teach in the winter and stay at home with my kids in the summer, so I don’t have a great need for many super dressy clothes! And I refuse to spend the money on them!! I think that money is better spent supporting my kids’ schools, paying their tuition, supporting charities. In the winter, I will wear what I wear to teach - dress slacks and sweaters.
Whether or not you wear a sleeveless blouse to Mass has little to do with the doctrines of the Church. Considering that what is or is not considered modest is actually deeply rooted in the culture of time and place, we as people of one particular culture can’t make absolute pronouncements as to what’s proper for Mass. If you dressed for Mass and then were transported back in time or to another place, it’s very possible that you would be viewed as immodest or inappropriate. The absolute here is modesty, but what constitutes modest dress is, by nature, relative.Be verrrrrry careful about what you attempt to justify. It’s the beginning of the road that leads to relativism!!!
Sorry Kristina, but you and I just don’t see eye to eye on this. We are talking about showing respect for the Lord in the house of the Lord. Respect transcends time or fashion. It involves common sense and common decency. And modesty, imho, is not at all relative!Whether or not you wear a sleeveless blouse to Mass has little to do with the doctrines of the Church. Considering that what is or is not considered modest is actually deeply rooted in the culture of time and place, we as people of one particular culture can’t make absolute pronouncements as to what’s proper for Mass. If you dressed for Mass and then were transported back in time or to another place, it’s very possible that you would be viewed as immodest or inappropriate. The absolute here is modesty, but what constitutes modest dress is, by nature, relative.
Which abbey?we are always in robes and sandles at mass, but we are benedictine monks.![]()
There is an old rule: When in Rome, do what the Romans do.What is wrong with an audience with the pope, king, or president in shorts and t-shirts? It only matters in the heart right?
But wait, ladies are required to wear mantillas in a private audience with the pope.
Vatican City has a dress code when entering, those vatican folks must be pharisical.
*I meant to say earthly.How do you know?
gnat said:*I meant to say earthly.
I know that because Jesus Christ isn’t superficial, like half the people in this thread that think some how sandals and knee length shorts offend our Lord. Jesus Christ isn’t calling me to wear a wool suit and sweat my *** off every Sunday just so I can look “nice”.
This whole discussion is rooted in what culture tells us to do, and that isn’t the place to find rules for church.
It might not just be you. Really, I don’t understand why we distracting women haven’t all been required to stay in our houses all day, since we’re causing men to sin.But don’t mind me, because even if all the girls at my church wore burkhas, I’d still get distracted by them, in all seriousness. It’s probably just me.
I completely respect your opinion, and I don’t want to give any other impression. But, please keep in mind that if you showed up to Mass in the Middle Ages, or even as recently as the nineteenth century, in what you would wear to Mass today, you would be judged as immodest. Same goes for if someone dressed modestly for certain parts of Africa showed up in a North American church. I was merely pointing out that the standards of modesty have changed, regardless of how people feel about the term “relative.” A teenage girl could also see my calf-length skirt and think that it wasn’t that much different from her mid-thigh-length skirt. Her bad judgment and immodesty should be corrected by her parents. I think when we start judging everyone who walks in and ambushing them if they’re not dressed right, we’re overstepping our bounds.Sorry Kristina, but you and I just don’t see eye to eye on this. We are talking about showing respect for the Lord in the house of the Lord. Respect transcends time or fashion. It involves common sense and common decency. And modesty, imho, is not at all relative!
Justification and relativism all happen bit by bit. If we start out justifying flip flops and shorts, in a few years time, what will we be willing to justify at mass? For example, you might think a sleeveless blouse and dressy skort are appropriate, but the teenage girl sitting two rows over might think, 'Hey, if she can wear that, then my shorts and tank top should be fine" and before you know it, you’re seeing belly shirts and daisy dukes.
We all serve as examples to one another. We cannot predict how others will be influenced by our decisions, so why take chances?
General said:If you really have to ask…
BTW, if their albs actually did 100% disguise the fact they are wearing shorts (which I’m certain they don’t), what keeps your priest from following suit? After all, who would know?
I don’t care what you wear or where you wear it, as long as it is modest. I don’t, as a rule, wear shorts to Mass, I wear slacks and a collared shirt. I have trouble with other’s attitudes that they are more devoted to Our Lord as is demonstrated by their dress. I don’t believe this. I also think we should worry about the beam in our own eyes before we go minding the mote in someone elses.Why Is Appropriate To Wear Whatever You Choose
For Mass, (and God) But Must Get Dresed In Our Finery For Our Friends Birthday Party Or To Go To An Expensive Restaurant?
No, General. You see, I wear the pants in the WINTER with my sweaters. I NEVER wear pants in the summer. I only wear dress shorts and sometimes capris and skirts (but probably too short for your approval, since they are far above the ankle).Go to a nice Catholic thrift store and spend $.50-5.00 on a nice blouse to go with your dress slacks for summer Masses – that will be FAR more appropriate than shorts and a sleeveless shirt.