B
Bballer32
Guest
Ok that is a good point… gave me a chuckleBy the way, the logic you used to suggest that a priest would be guilty of polygamy if he were to be married, because he is married to the Church really makes no sense, unless you also want to say that the Church herself is polygamous for having so many husbands!
St. Paul chose celibacy for a reason. He wanted to be like Christ. This is probably the most legitimate reason why priests should also be celibate. I have found very few legit reasons for married priests. But what do i know? I’m only a teen.As for the importance of clerical celibacy, I’m not really interested in what the Catholic Encyclopedia has to say. I’ve studied Church history. What happened was that the theological justifications were added after the Church decided to enforce clercial celibacy for what were entirely practical, non-doctrinal reasons. Clerical celibacy was adopted in order to address a need of the time. Should legitimate reasons arise (I personally believe they have), the Church certainly has the option of permitting a married priesthood. Furthermore, I’m Eastern Catholic, and in the Eastern Catholic tradition, we value and honor a married priesthood.
As for you being Eastern Catholic, I respect your tradition. As we both recognize the pope, i will continue to follow his teachings. Am i against married clergy; yes, i think a single male will be easier to move around, easier to trust, etc. If the pope woke up tomorrow and said that men could be married then become priests, i would respect that. But as a young teenage discerning the priesthood, i’ve come to realize that i need to be single in order to be the best priest i can be.
And there may not be a legitimate document claiming priests to be married to the Church, but in the long run, i see it being the most reasonable that celibate priests are married to the Church. I’ll double check with my priest and talk to him more about this.