Should the Church reconsider its position on hell?

  • Thread starter Thread starter romano
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
JKirkLVNV:
To dispense with hell would be to contravene the Words of our Lord Himself.
more like what happens in hell/when hell is/where/who/what/why/how than dispensing hell itself.
 
Of all aspects of the modern age that perplexes me most is the idea that since we use democratic republics as our form of government that it should apply to all the other institutions that we as humans are part of. The idea that the Pope or a conclave of Cardinals should vote to repeal those parts of the faith that make people squemish is utterly ridiculous.
 
40.png
romano:
But is there any scriptural evidence for purgatory?
1 Cor 310By the grace God has given me, I laid a foundation as an expert builder, and someone else is building on it. But each one should be careful how he builds. 11For no one can lay any foundation other than the one already laid, which is Jesus Christ. 12If any man builds on this foundation using gold, silver, costly stones, wood, hay or straw, 13his work will be shown for what it is, because the Day will bring it to light. It will be revealed with fire, and the fire will test the quality of each man’s work. 14If what he has built survives, he will receive his reward. 15If it is burned up, he will suffer loss; he himself will be saved, but only as one escaping through the flames.
Does Christ mention purgatory anywhere?
Most references which Jesus makes to gnashing of teeth and fire can be applied to hell as well as purgatory. Only the ones that reference eternal fire must be applied to hell exclusively.

Matthew 8:12
But the subjects of the kingdom will be thrown outside, into the darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth."

Matthew 18:8
If your hand or your foot causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away. It is better for you to enter life maimed or crippled than to have two hands or two feet and be thrown into eternal fire.
Isn’t the doctrine of purgatory rather something that was cooked up precisely because the notion of hell that we find in the scriptures seems inconsistent with an infinitely loving and merciful God?
No.
Who first posited purgatory?
Jesus. Do you mean who coined the word “purgatory”? That would be:

History of the belief in Purgatory:

Some of the early Church Fathers wrote about an intermediate state after death; a way station on the path to Heaven. Many wrote about the importance of issuing prayers for the dead. Such prayers only make sense if a third state - one other than Heaven or Hell - exists. After all, if the person who died is in Heaven, prayers would be meaningless; if the person was in Hell, then they are already lost and prayers would not help them.

Early Christian writers included "Fathers Tertullian, Origen, Cyprian, Lactantius, Eusebius, Cyril, Gregory of Nyssa, Epiphanius, Jerome, Ambrose, John Chrysostom, Augustine, Gregory the Great, Venerable Bede and second-millennium theologians such as Anselm, Bernard, Aquinas and Bonaventure…" 1,2 Prayers for the dead are also found in early Christian catacombs and in early church liturgies.
Code:
    *"Both purgatory and prayers for the dead were upheld by the major councils, beginning with the Council of Carthage in 394 A.D."*
Belief in Purgatory became a formal church ‘dogma’ only in the 16th century. The historical emphasis of the church had been that Purgatory is a dreadful place of painful, long-lasting punishment with fire. More recent references by the Pope imply that Purgatory is not “*a place but [rather] a condition of life.”
*

religioustolerance.org/purgatory1.htm

I don’t know anything about that website but the information seems accurate.

Sincerely,

De Maria
 
** III. THE FINAL PURIFICATION, OR PURGATORY **

1030 All who die in God’s grace and friendship, but still imperfectly purified, are indeed assured of their eternal salvation; but after death they undergo purification, so as to achieve the holiness necessary to enter the joy of heaven.

[1031](javascript:openWindow(‘cr/1031.htm’)😉 The Church gives the name *Purgatory *to this final purification of the elect, which is entirely different from the punishment of the damned.606 The Church formulated her doctrine of faith on Purgatory especially at the Councils of Florence and Trent. The tradition of the Church, by reference to certain texts of Scripture, speaks of a cleansing fire:607

As for certain lesser faults, we must believe that, before the Final Judgment, there is a purifying fire. He who is truth says that whoever utters blasphemy against the Holy Spirit will be pardoned neither in this age nor in the age to come. From this sentence we understand that certain offenses can be forgiven in this age, but certain others in the age to come.608
[1032](javascript:openWindow(‘cr/1032.htm’)😉 This teaching is also based on the practice of prayer for the dead, already mentioned in Sacred Scripture: "Therefore [Judas Maccabeus] made atonement for the dead, that they might be delivered from their sin."609 From the beginning the Church has honored the memory of the dead and offered prayers in suffrage for them, above all the Eucharistic sacrifice, so that, thus purified, they may attain the beatific vision of God.610 The Church also commends almsgiving, indulgences, and works of penance undertaken on behalf of the dead:

Let us help and commemorate them. If Job’s sons were purified by their father’s sacrifice, why would we doubt that our offerings for the dead bring them some consolation? Let us not hesitate to help those who have died and to offer our prayers for them.611

The punishments of sin

[1472](javascript:openWindow(‘cr/1472.htm’)😉
To understand this doctrine and practice of the Church, it is necessary to understand that sin has a double consequence. Grave sin deprives us of communion with God and therefore makes us incapable of eternal life, the privation of which is called the “eternal punishment” of sin. On the other hand every sin, even venial, entails an unhealthy attachment to creatures, which must be purified either here on earth, or after death in the state called Purgatory. This purification frees one from what is called the “temporal punishment” of sin. These two punishments must not be conceived of as a kind of vengeance inflicted by God from without, but as following from the very nature of sin. A conversion which proceeds from a fervent charity can attain the complete purification of the sinner in such a way that no punishment would remain.84
 
Gen 2:17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.

Gen 3:4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:

Jhn 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

God said, “thou shalt surely die.”
the serpent said, “Ye shall not surely die:”
John 3:16, “perish” or “have everlasting life.”

who will you believe?

do you notice how other religion and beliefs have this theme of the immortal soul? like reincarnation, where the immortal soul keeps coming back in a new body.
 
40.png
yqbd:
do you notice how other religion and beliefs have this theme of the immortal soul? like reincarnation, where the immortal soul keeps coming back in a new body.
True, but in Hinduism, for instance, reincarnation is not the goal. The goal is communion with God, which stops the reincarnation process entirely. In addition, Hindus believe both in (1) heaven and hell; and (2) reincarnation in a physical body; the two notions are synthesized in the Hindu system.
 
no more death.

Rev 21:4 And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away.

Rev 21:6 And he said unto me, It is done. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely.

second death, not second life burning infinity.

Rev 21:8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

Rev 2:11 He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; He that overcometh shall not be hurt of the second death.

Rev 20:6 Blessed and holy [is] he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years.

Rev 20:14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.
 
The Church has no authority to change the teaching of Hell. Hell is very real. God is Love, but God is also Just. Do you want murderers, rapists, demons, and etc to be with you in Heaven? I wouldn’t, especially since I might be there for eternity.
 
40.png
Zooey:
It is perfectly true that we do not know other people’s hearts. It is true that God knows. We know what we see, however.Example: I watched the **fruits **of Mother Teresa’s life. She poured out love to everyone for decades. I do not claim to know her heart, but it is reasonable to assume that these actions flowed from her oft expressed love for our Lord. If I accept that, (and I do!), I can reasonably presume to know that she is in Heaven with Him.
I saw the fruits of a group of fanatics on 9/11/2001. Again, I do not know their hearts. I do know that if they did not repent, they died with murder on their souls. I believe that it is reasonable to at least doubt that they are in Heaven now, because their deeds showed their hearts.
Can I be totally wrong about this? Gosh, yes. I am only:p human. I make mistakes all the time. However, to use Catholic terminolgy on this point, if one person dies in a state of mortal sin, while the second has not even any venial sin in her heart, it is not unreasonable to presume that the former’s present state is less happy than the latter’s.
Therefore, until, as another post has all ready suggested, until Jesus comes back & retracts His previous statements on [hell], I must believe in it.
It is absolutely true that God **is **a God of grace. That is why Jesus went to the cross. But you see, unless God is not also a God of justice, that sacrifice would not have been necessary . If God,( being in charge of all things, )could have somehow forgiven sins in another way-- without the brutal torture & death of our Lord-- then He would have.Since He did not do so, & since Jesus did teach of a real hell, I am forced to believe in it also.
Anything else would make mortal sins a joke, & the Lord Jesus a liar or deluded…neither of which I can believe.
God bless.

If God were just - there would be no grace 🙂

AFAICS, nothing so fully shows the Love of Christ as the Crucifixion - so I (at least) don’t see how anything but the Cross could have possible (I know this has been much debated down the centuries) ##
 
40.png
jimmy:
No, the Church can’t change what it has always taught.
But it can expand on past teachings? without changing them?
For example, the doctrine of no salvation outside the Church?
Pope St. Gregory the Great, quoted in *Summo Iugiter Studio, *590-604:

“The holy universal Church teaches that it is not possible to worship God truly except in her and asserts that all who are outside of her will not be saved.”**

*Pope Innocent III, Eius exemplo, Dec. 18, 1208:

“By the heart we believe and by the mouth we confess the one Church, notof heretics, but the Holy Roman, Catholic, and Apostolic Church outside of which we believe that no one is saved.”

Pope Clement VI, Super quibusdam, Sept. 20, 1351:

“In the second place, we ask whether you and the Armenians obedient to you believe that no man of the wayfarers outside the faith of this Church, and outside the obedience to the Pope of Rome, can finally be saved.”

Pope Leo XII, Ubi Primum (# 14), May 5, 1824:

“It is impossible for the most true God, who is Truth itself, the best, the wisest Provider, and the Rewarder of good men, to approve all sects who profess false teachings which are often inconsistent with one another and contradictory, and to confer eternal rewards on their members… by divine faith we hold one Lord, one faith, one baptism… This is why we profess that there is no salvation outside the Church.”

Pope Gregory XVI, Mirari Vos (# 13), Aug. 15, 1832: “With the admonition of the apostle, that ‘there is one God, one faith, one baptism’ (Eph. 4:5), may those fear who contrive the notion that the safe harbor of salvation is open to persons of any religion whatever. They should consider the testimony of Christ Himself that ‘those who are not with Christ are against Him,’ (Lk. 11:23)and that they disperse unhappily who do not gather with Him. Therefore, ‘without a doubt, they will perish forever, unless they hold the Catholic faith whole and inviolate (Athanasian Creed).”

Pope Pius IX, *Ubi primum *(# 10), June 17, 1847: “For ‘there is one universal Church outside of which no one at all is saved; it contains regular and secular prelates along with those under their jurisdiction, who all profess one Lord, one faith and one baptism.”

Pope Innocent III, Fourth Lateran Council, Constitution 1, 121a: “THERE IS INDEED ONE UNIVERSAL CHURCH OF THE FAITHFUL, outside of which nobody at all is saved, in which Jesus Christ is both priest and sacrifice.”

**However, according to the **“Reflections on Covenant and Mission,” a joint Catholic-Jewish document, “A deepening appreciation of the eternal covenant between God and the Jewish people . . . lead to the conclusion that campaigns that target Jews for conversion to Christianity are no longer theologically acceptable in the Catholic Church.”

And, according to Walter Cardinal Kasper, president of the Pontifical Commission for the Religious Relations with the Jews, "the Church believes that Judaism . . . is salvific for [the Jews] because God is faithful to his promises.”

So it looks like the Church has expanded on its previous teaching on this???*
 
40.png
Zooey:
Good grief!!! No, no, a thousand times no!!!
I said this some time ago, in a thread on universalism, & I will repeat it here:
Adolf Hitler & St, Teresa of Avila having teaparties in Heaven ?? I think :nope: NOT!!!
Could that not be the foreshadowing of the Lion and the Lamb?

Alan
 
Ladies and Gentlemen, Jesus Himself spoke of Gehenna (the Jewish hell) 7 or 8 times. You don’t doubt Jesus do you?

If God is just, then there has to be a hell IF there is a heaven. Does heaven exist? Read Johm 14 :1 - 3. Jesus says He will prepare a place in His Fathers house. His Father is a Spirit - God.
 
Anyone who is a member of the Roman Catholic Church and denies the reality of an eternal hell of fire and torment, should be excommunicated for denying the faith. Christ, the apostles, the church fathers and the Catholic Catechism all are in agreement of it’s terrible reality. Enough of this non sense.
 
40.png
Exporter:
Ladies and Gentlemen, Jesus Himself spoke of Gehenna (the Jewish hell) 7 or 8 times. You don’t doubt Jesus do you?

If God is just, then there has to be a hell IF there is a heaven. Does heaven exist? Read Johm 14 :1 - 3. Jesus says He will prepare a place in His Fathers house. His Father is a Spirit - God.
If Jesus taught a Jewish conception of hell, then that leads to the question: is Christian ideas of hell simply affirmations of Jewish conceptions of hell? And which Jewish tradition are we talking about?
 
40.png
Ahimsa:
If Jesus taught a Jewish conception of hell, then that leads to the question: is Christian ideas of hell simply affirmations of Jewish conceptions of hell? And which Jewish tradition are we talking about?
Best solution – trust the Church!
 
40.png
foofydo:
purgatory,no such thing…If any one who has read the bible at least 1 time…they understand… (no such thing)
READ THE BIBLE
2 Maccabees 12:42-46 states that it is just to pray and offer sacrifices for the sake of the dead. Considering the parable of Lazarus and the rich man (namely, that it is impossible to cross from heaven to hell, and vice versa), I would have to say that this notion is completely pointless unless purgatory exists. Your only recourse would be to say that after death, we are sent to some kind of “wainting room,” but how would this “waiting room” NOT be purgatory?
40.png
foofydo:
unless the catholic “priest” say not too
Or is the entire point of your post merely to fling mud in our collective eyes? The anti-catholic nature becomes apparent here.
40.png
foofydo:
That’s what my priest told me…"it’s not important’ just follow the catechism…
The two don’t contradict each other. If your priest actually said this, then he was in error. But you’re not really a catholic, are you?
40.png
foofydo:
Just like the cross…not as important as what the “priest, pope, whoever” says at the time…
Again, the two aren’t in contradiction. You’re really stretching here.
40.png
foofydo:
Jesus must have died in vain…
This is a very un-Christian attitude. Look, He died to save all people. If some reject this salvation, that is tragic, but it does not make His sacrifice in vain, especially for the sake of those whom He does save.
40.png
foofydo:
so sad for most Catholics…Just trust in Mary…she will lead you out of hell…
Um, trusting Mary seems pretty safe, considering that if nothing else, she will point you to her Son. When looked at in the proper context, Mary is dignified because of her relationship with Christ, not in place of Christ. Where did Mary enter into this conversation, again?
40.png
foofydo:
Jesus is sinless…
I see that we can agree on at least one thing.
40.png
foofydo:
Mary, born into sin…just like us all…
No, see the post about Luke 1:28-30 (thanks slinky1882)
 
40.png
foofydo:
Mary died
Most evidence would point contrary to that. Look, Elijah and Enoch were both assumed into heaven without dying. Why is it so hard to believe that Mary was too? Furthermore, there are no ancient accounts of her dying. No tomb. And perhaps most compelling, NO REMAINS. COnsidering the pains that early Christians went through to retrieve the reamains of their dead brethren, this seems incredible. Also, no one ever seriously claimed to have her remains later, which is BIG because of the value associated with relics.
40.png
foofydo:
and went to Heaven (I’m assuming)…she gave birth to Jesus…YAY…we all no that…
That tends to happen when one is assumed.
40.png
foofydo:
She was a sinner like all of us…unless of course you all put her on a pedistal…
See above.
40.png
foofydo:
what is that line…hmmmmmmmm not worshipping any other gods …idols…etc
What is mary then…another god…ok…
Wrong, we don’t worship Mary, we venerate her. That is, we respect her. That is altogether different than worshipping her.
40.png
foofydo:
so she is the mother of Jesus…she also came short…she cannot pray for us sinners…(she is )
Again, see above.
40.png
foofydo:
you go directly to Jesus…
Preferrably yes, but, well, haven’t you ever asked someone else to pray for you? Or been asked to pray for someone else?
40.png
foofydo:
unless you rather go to mary…the cannot hear us…
See above. Also, refer to the parable of Lazarus and the rich man. The rich man asks Lazarus to go to his brothers to warn them. Seems pretty reasonable that they can hear us, and they certainly have God’s favor already. Sort of like asking another sibling to help with parents when you’re in trouble.
40.png
foofydo:
Nowhere in the bible it says Mary was assumed…if it was sooo important it would have been written…she is not being “protected”…come on…I believe she is in Heaven but cannot contact us…she was a sinner just like all of us…the bible does NOT say she was assumed into heaven…if it was soo important it would have said it…MARY died and cannot pray for any sinners…sheesh…
The Bible doesn’t say she wasn’t assumed, and most evidence supports that she was. Beyond that, you’re babbling, rambling, and repeating yourself here.
40.png
foofydo:
READ the bible unless your priest told you it’s not necisary…
Again, why all of the hostility?
40.png
foofydo:
He is coming again soon…are you worthy?..You will see…Mary died…
Unlikely. Nobody is worthy, salvation is a gift of God. By the way, if you’re a Christian, I take it that you believe in salvation through faith alone? Catholics have faith too, so why attack us on this point?

Your post, though largely incoherrent, demonstrates that you obviously hold some grudge or general agnst against Catholics and catholocism. Why? Is it not better to forgive? Isn’t that what Christ taught? This general attack on us isn’t going to help anyone, and it isn’t going to win you any friends or converts in the process. So I conclude by saying simply, “Peace be with you.”
 
40.png
Contarini:
I don’t think a Council is needed. On the contrary, the only thing a Council would be needed for would be to reject such a reformulation, if it was heretical. In other words, I certainly don’t expect that the Church will ever declare that universal salvation is possible. But currently it seems to be treated as an allowable opinion–Hans Urs von Balthasar is a highly respected theologian of the past century who held this, and today Fr. Neuhaus takes the same view. (Cardinal Dulles is a bit more cautious, it appears.)

It clearly is not orthodox to say that universal salvation is inevitable. But until the Church clearly decrees otherwise, it appears to be allowable for Catholics to hold that universal salvation is possible.

Edwin
I recall that when I was taking a philosophy of religion class in college about 8 years ago that we discussed this topic. There was theory being floated around the early church that since God was infinitely good that eventully every soul would make it to heaven-some would just have a really, really, really, long time in purgatory. The church declared it a heresy. I can not for the life of me remember the man who was teaching this doctrines name. Like I said it was about 8 years ago. Does anyone else know who I’m talking about or remember any of the details?(Mine might be a little fuzzy) 🙂
 
I always thought this topic was already decided when Jesus HIMSELF said there IS a Hell. (He used words that would describe such a place).

So if Christ said there is a Hell. There IS a Hell.

No debate needed!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top