Y
yqbd
Guest
more like what happens in hell/when hell is/where/who/what/why/how than dispensing hell itself.To dispense with hell would be to contravene the Words of our Lord Himself.
more like what happens in hell/when hell is/where/who/what/why/how than dispensing hell itself.To dispense with hell would be to contravene the Words of our Lord Himself.
1 Cor 310By the grace God has given me, I laid a foundation as an expert builder, and someone else is building on it. But each one should be careful how he builds. 11For no one can lay any foundation other than the one already laid, which is Jesus Christ. 12If any man builds on this foundation using gold, silver, costly stones, wood, hay or straw, 13his work will be shown for what it is, because the Day will bring it to light. It will be revealed with fire, and the fire will test the quality of each man’s work. 14If what he has built survives, he will receive his reward. 15If it is burned up, he will suffer loss; he himself will be saved, but only as one escaping through the flames.But is there any scriptural evidence for purgatory?
Most references which Jesus makes to gnashing of teeth and fire can be applied to hell as well as purgatory. Only the ones that reference eternal fire must be applied to hell exclusively.Does Christ mention purgatory anywhere?
No.Isn’t the doctrine of purgatory rather something that was cooked up precisely because the notion of hell that we find in the scriptures seems inconsistent with an infinitely loving and merciful God?
Jesus. Do you mean who coined the word “purgatory”? That would be:Who first posited purgatory?
*"Both purgatory and prayers for the dead were upheld by the major councils, beginning with the Council of Carthage in 394 A.D."*
True, but in Hinduism, for instance, reincarnation is not the goal. The goal is communion with God, which stops the reincarnation process entirely. In addition, Hindus believe both in (1) heaven and hell; and (2) reincarnation in a physical body; the two notions are synthesized in the Hindu system.do you notice how other religion and beliefs have this theme of the immortal soul? like reincarnation, where the immortal soul keeps coming back in a new body.
It is perfectly true that we do not know other people’s hearts. It is true that God knows. We know what we see, however.Example: I watched the **fruits **of Mother Teresa’s life. She poured out love to everyone for decades. I do not claim to know her heart, but it is reasonable to assume that these actions flowed from her oft expressed love for our Lord. If I accept that, (and I do!), I can reasonably presume to know that she is in Heaven with Him.
I saw the fruits of a group of fanatics on 9/11/2001. Again, I do not know their hearts. I do know that if they did not repent, they died with murder on their souls. I believe that it is reasonable to at least doubt that they are in Heaven now, because their deeds showed their hearts.
Can I be totally wrong about this? Gosh, yes. I am onlyhuman. I make mistakes all the time. However, to use Catholic terminolgy on this point, if one person dies in a state of mortal sin, while the second has not even any venial sin in her heart, it is not unreasonable to presume that the former’s present state is less happy than the latter’s.
Therefore, until, as another post has all ready suggested, until Jesus comes back & retracts His previous statements on [hell], I must believe in it.
It is absolutely true that God **is **a God of grace. That is why Jesus went to the cross. But you see, unless God is not also a God of justice, that sacrifice would not have been necessary . If God,( being in charge of all things, )could have somehow forgiven sins in another way-- without the brutal torture & death of our Lord-- then He would have.Since He did not do so, & since Jesus did teach of a real hell, I am forced to believe in it also.
Anything else would make mortal sins a joke, & the Lord Jesus a liar or deluded…neither of which I can believe.
God bless.
But it can expand on past teachings? without changing them?No, the Church can’t change what it has always taught.
Could that not be the foreshadowing of the Lion and the Lamb?Good grief!!! No, no, a thousand times no!!!
I said this some time ago, in a thread on universalism, & I will repeat it here:
Adolf Hitler & St, Teresa of Avila having teaparties in Heaven ?? I think :nope: NOT!!!
If Jesus taught a Jewish conception of hell, then that leads to the question: is Christian ideas of hell simply affirmations of Jewish conceptions of hell? And which Jewish tradition are we talking about?Ladies and Gentlemen, Jesus Himself spoke of Gehenna (the Jewish hell) 7 or 8 times. You don’t doubt Jesus do you?
If God is just, then there has to be a hell IF there is a heaven. Does heaven exist? Read Johm 14 :1 - 3. Jesus says He will prepare a place in His Fathers house. His Father is a Spirit - God.
Best solution – trust the Church!If Jesus taught a Jewish conception of hell, then that leads to the question: is Christian ideas of hell simply affirmations of Jewish conceptions of hell? And which Jewish tradition are we talking about?
2 Maccabees 12:42-46 states that it is just to pray and offer sacrifices for the sake of the dead. Considering the parable of Lazarus and the rich man (namely, that it is impossible to cross from heaven to hell, and vice versa), I would have to say that this notion is completely pointless unless purgatory exists. Your only recourse would be to say that after death, we are sent to some kind of “wainting room,” but how would this “waiting room” NOT be purgatory?purgatory,no such thing…If any one who has read the bible at least 1 time…they understand… (no such thing)
READ THE BIBLE
Or is the entire point of your post merely to fling mud in our collective eyes? The anti-catholic nature becomes apparent here.unless the catholic “priest” say not too
The two don’t contradict each other. If your priest actually said this, then he was in error. But you’re not really a catholic, are you?That’s what my priest told me…"it’s not important’ just follow the catechism…
Again, the two aren’t in contradiction. You’re really stretching here.Just like the cross…not as important as what the “priest, pope, whoever” says at the time…
This is a very un-Christian attitude. Look, He died to save all people. If some reject this salvation, that is tragic, but it does not make His sacrifice in vain, especially for the sake of those whom He does save.Jesus must have died in vain…
Um, trusting Mary seems pretty safe, considering that if nothing else, she will point you to her Son. When looked at in the proper context, Mary is dignified because of her relationship with Christ, not in place of Christ. Where did Mary enter into this conversation, again?so sad for most Catholics…Just trust in Mary…she will lead you out of hell…
I see that we can agree on at least one thing.Jesus is sinless…
No, see the post about Luke 1:28-30 (thanks slinky1882)Mary, born into sin…just like us all…
Most evidence would point contrary to that. Look, Elijah and Enoch were both assumed into heaven without dying. Why is it so hard to believe that Mary was too? Furthermore, there are no ancient accounts of her dying. No tomb. And perhaps most compelling, NO REMAINS. COnsidering the pains that early Christians went through to retrieve the reamains of their dead brethren, this seems incredible. Also, no one ever seriously claimed to have her remains later, which is BIG because of the value associated with relics.Mary died
That tends to happen when one is assumed.and went to Heaven (I’m assuming)…she gave birth to Jesus…YAY…we all no that…
See above.She was a sinner like all of us…unless of course you all put her on a pedistal…
Wrong, we don’t worship Mary, we venerate her. That is, we respect her. That is altogether different than worshipping her.what is that line…hmmmmmmmm not worshipping any other gods …idols…etc
What is mary then…another god…ok…
Again, see above.so she is the mother of Jesus…she also came short…she cannot pray for us sinners…(she is )
Preferrably yes, but, well, haven’t you ever asked someone else to pray for you? Or been asked to pray for someone else?you go directly to Jesus…
See above. Also, refer to the parable of Lazarus and the rich man. The rich man asks Lazarus to go to his brothers to warn them. Seems pretty reasonable that they can hear us, and they certainly have God’s favor already. Sort of like asking another sibling to help with parents when you’re in trouble.unless you rather go to mary…the cannot hear us…
The Bible doesn’t say she wasn’t assumed, and most evidence supports that she was. Beyond that, you’re babbling, rambling, and repeating yourself here.Nowhere in the bible it says Mary was assumed…if it was sooo important it would have been written…she is not being “protected”…come on…I believe she is in Heaven but cannot contact us…she was a sinner just like all of us…the bible does NOT say she was assumed into heaven…if it was soo important it would have said it…MARY died and cannot pray for any sinners…sheesh…
Again, why all of the hostility?READ the bible unless your priest told you it’s not necisary…
Unlikely. Nobody is worthy, salvation is a gift of God. By the way, if you’re a Christian, I take it that you believe in salvation through faith alone? Catholics have faith too, so why attack us on this point?He is coming again soon…are you worthy?..You will see…Mary died…
I recall that when I was taking a philosophy of religion class in college about 8 years ago that we discussed this topic. There was theory being floated around the early church that since God was infinitely good that eventully every soul would make it to heaven-some would just have a really, really, really, long time in purgatory. The church declared it a heresy. I can not for the life of me remember the man who was teaching this doctrines name. Like I said it was about 8 years ago. Does anyone else know who I’m talking about or remember any of the details?(Mine might be a little fuzzy)I don’t think a Council is needed. On the contrary, the only thing a Council would be needed for would be to reject such a reformulation, if it was heretical. In other words, I certainly don’t expect that the Church will ever declare that universal salvation is possible. But currently it seems to be treated as an allowable opinion–Hans Urs von Balthasar is a highly respected theologian of the past century who held this, and today Fr. Neuhaus takes the same view. (Cardinal Dulles is a bit more cautious, it appears.)
It clearly is not orthodox to say that universal salvation is inevitable. But until the Church clearly decrees otherwise, it appears to be allowable for Catholics to hold that universal salvation is possible.
Edwin
Pelagianism. Pelagius.Does anyone else know who I’m talking about or remember any of the details?(Mine might be a little fuzzy)![]()