Should we all be doing apologetics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rekenber
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
R

Rekenber

Guest
Correct me if there is anything un-Christian with both my intentions and my questions. Thanks and God Bless.

Are there only specific Catholics / Christians who can fully be an apologist? Should we all be studying this discipline? If the latter’s answer is yes, how can we encourage other to defend our faith?
 
We should all seek to have a fuller knowledge of God and his Word and his Church and be as ready as possible to expose fallacious against them.
 
I feel it’s my duty as a Catholic to be fully informed about my faith in order to answer misconceptions and sometimes outright lies that are peddled about my faith.

This is the main reason I joined CAF.
 
With the previous replies, I think their answer is that everyone should be studying apologetics.

Now, how can we encourage others to do the same?
 
Should we all be doing apologetics?
No, absolutely not.

Apologetics is a skill - a mixture of knowledge, perception, and judgement. Not everybody has this skill, and it cannot be acquired by knowledge alone. Those who lack the skill but yet try to engage in this field could easily do more harm than good.

The risk is lower for people who wish to “practice” apologetics on this forum. If someone goofs up (as I have, on many occasions) somebody else will usually come along and correct the mistake - so the damage is minimized.

But going one-on-one without back-up is risky for someone who has not prepared himself.

And commando apologetics (such as participating in an anti-Catholic forum) should be the purview of only HIGHLY experienced and competent (and VERY patient) apologists (which is why I do not engage these forums).
 
Not expecting you to go out and convert the heathen masses, but you should at least try to familiarize yourself with certain aspects of apologetics.

[BIBLEDRB]1 Peter 3:15[/BIBLEDRB]
 
No, absolutely not.

Apologetics is a skill - a mixture of knowledge, perception, and judgement. Not everybody has this skill, and it cannot be acquired by knowledge alone. Those who lack the skill but yet try to engage in this field could easily do more harm than good.

The risk is lower for people who wish to “practice” apologetics on this forum. If someone goofs up (as I have, on many occasions) somebody else will usually come along and correct the mistake - so the damage is minimized.

But going one-on-one without back-up is risky for someone who has not prepared himself.

And commando apologetics (such as participating in an anti-Catholic forum) should be the purview of only HIGHLY experienced and competent (and VERY patient) apologists (which is why I do not engage these forums).
I see. So can this skill be learned?

EDIT: Then, we could just study some parts to have a basic understanding, then leave the rest to the experienced? Am I getting your point?
 
I see. So can this skill be learned?
It can be honed. But each of us are different in what talents we have.
Like in school our classmates were taught the same way,thing yet some excelled others weren’t as good. And very few were good at everything.
 
We should all strive to understand the basics, but sometimes simple faith is the holiest faith.

I enjoy these forums because I think having one’s assumptions challenged is a good thing. But I do not pretend to speak for the Church.
 
I feel it’s my duty as a Catholic to be fully informed about my faith in order to answer misconceptions and sometimes outright lies that are peddled about my faith.

This is the main reason I joined CAF.
amen - this is why I joined too!
 
I see. So can this skill be learned?
It can be learned as much as any other human skill can be learned. We can all learn to play the violin, but only a few of us can do it well. We can all learn quantum physics, but only a few of us can acquire genuine insight.
Then, we could just study some parts to have a basic understanding, then leave the rest to the experienced? Am I getting your point?
All Catholics should have a basic understanding of their Faith. Not all Catholics are able to effectively defend their Faith from direct attack. And that’s OK - the Church does not impose any such general obligation upon the Faithful. Those who can accept this should do so.

“Experience” is not required - only ability is required. Albert Einstein was only a patent clerk when he realized that the forces of acceleration and gravity could not be distinguished by any experiment (this “thought experiment” is his “equivalence principle” which led to the special and general theory of relativity).

But, as I said, this forum is a good place for people to gain both knowledge and experience, and to discern if they are called to the apologetic ministry.
 
David is right when he says not everyone is meant to be an apologist per se, however, I would qualify that with the need for every Catholic to learn as much as possible about our most holy faith. Apologetics materials are actually quite handy for that purpose.

We need to remember what the definition of apologetics actually is… “to explain and defend the Catholic faith.”

I began my own journey into apologetics simply because I had a need to know why I believed what I did, and only as time went on did I really begin to even think of it as apologetics. In finding the answers many of my own questions, I also found them for others who talked with me. Some were genuinely curious and respectful, while others were less so.

The “intarwebz”, as my sons sometimes call it, is another area again. It can be great for learning our faith, but it can also be something of a war zone of debate and polemics. It’s hard sometimes not to be drawn into those places. (A sense of humor is mandatory!)

Furthermore, the study of good (and inexpensive!) apologetics sources like
shop.catholic.com/images/T/B0279t.gif
See details Beginning Apologetics Vol. 1
SKU: B0279

Volume I deals with defending Catholicism. Prepare yourself to answer challenges to the Catholic faith.

Our price: US$5.95
can prepare us to to both share the faith and pass it on through RCIA and other religious education opportunities.

Ultimately, I suspect that all of us will encounter some apologetics opportunities in the course of our lives and our ability to rise to those challenges will depend on how well we know why we believe what we do.
 
Thanks for the wonderful replies. Seems my view on the topic is a bit overboard (thinking that everyone should be one, my bad). Thanks a bunch on this 😃

I’ll check if the book is available locally in here 🙂 Else, I am not that keen with regards to e-commerce yet. XD

I had this notion that apologetics can intensify a person’s testimony of Christ. I don’t know if I am having the appropriate mindset about this.

What should be one’s outlook if one is not able to defend the Faith effectively? Should he or she quit at it?
 
I would agree with DavidFilmer’s first post. TO some degree we should all learn apologetics because on a one on one basis in our daily lives we are going to run in to people with misconceptions who have honest and legitimate questions. Most anti-Catholics on the internet do not have honest questions and are looking to trap and confuse you. That is why anti-Catholic sites are not for the ameture apologist. You must discern if God has given you this skill and the best way to do that is start out on a Catholic site like this and if you find them interesting read some of the many apologetics books. Don’t leave out something like “Winning Souls for Christ” by Fr. Ralph Raoul, or I can’t remember Patrick Madrid’s boo so that you have a proper perspective on evangelization and what it is REALLY all about. Apologetics many times can come accross as an arguement.

Gerald
 
I joined this site to hone my own skills. So if you think this is important then pick a thread in the forum(s) and contribute. You’ll get some pretty immediate feedback on your clarity and charity. 😃

Or you can start your own thread. You’ll see many of the kind of "how would you defend the teaching on ". If you have a particular aspect of the faith that has always intrigued you you might start there.

And then there is the ever popular search feature. Again, if you have a particular topic/aspect of the faith try searching this site. You’ll probably find AT LEAST one existing thread covering it. Read all the posts. See which ones seem to get the most positive responses and which ones generate heat (instead of light).

One key thing I always try to remember - we are out to win souls, not arguments.
 
Are all apologist debaters? like staples or keating?

Can someone actually claim himself to be an apologist even if he won’t engage himself in professional apologetic debates like staples and karl keating?

What if someone has the will to learn apologetics and is doing research to learn to explain the Catholic faith without the goal of actually becoming a professional apologetic debater, is that person still an apologist or not?

I am a convert from Presbyterian Church, I am studying Catholic apologetics to answer the question of people seeking for knowledge about our faith. And also if the situation is calling me to do it, If I could, i’m willing to engage in casual debates with an average protestant or evangelical. If this is the case, can I call my self an apologist though not a professional one?
 
As I see it there are various levels of apologetics. These are the general categories:
  1. The Catholic who wishes to be able to do as St. Peter admonished us:
Always be prepared to make a defense to any one who calls you to account for the hope that is in you, yet do it with gentleness and reverence. (1 Pt. 3: 15b)

This would be most Catholics who have some experience talking to friends about the faith and have defended it with what they know and even priests/religious because even they are not necessarily called to apologetics, per se.
  1. Those who like to debate/defend the faith online in fora or blogs or who teach at the diocesan/parish level on a volunteer basis.
The number of these seems to be growing as the need is rising.
  1. The professional who publishes books and/or debates other professional writers/objectors.
There are several of these now, but not when I was researching the faith in the early 90’s. They started out, as did Karl Keating and many others as category one folks who found apologetics their calling.

Every Catholic should fall into category one, at the very least. Those who aren’t at that level yet are those who also fall into various categories ranging from non-practicing Catholics to those who know too little (who can be educated) to those who pick and choose among Catholic beliefs to those who simply don’t care.

Apologists from category two and three, however, are involved in apostolate/ministrial work. Some more than others, especially in category two. Even in category three there are good apologists, and then there are some so-so ones who might want to consider putting their efforts into some other apostolate/ministry.

Any Catholic who engages in any form of apologetics first needs a love for those they wish to help. Apologetics isn’t a debate format, at least not in the traditional sense. Rather, debate is merely a tool, one of many, that an apologist might use. The goal is to help non-Catholics or Catholics with questions/concerns to learn the truth about the teachings of the Church, and in learning to come to love God and the Church Christ founded.

The cornerstone of the apostolate is love, just as in any other Christian work. Being a category two or three apologist isn’t for everyone, as others have written, just as being a teacher or a spiritual director or an evangelist or a religious is not for everyone but for those who feel God has called them into it.
 
I feel it’s my duty as a Catholic to be fully informed about my faith in order to answer misconceptions and sometimes outright lies that are peddled about my faith.
I agree. I had to start immediately upon telling my Baptist friends that I was converting. This truly the reaction I was getting :eek: I consider it an honor to defend the faith. Just 2 weeks ago the husband of one of my best friends sat me down because he had a few “questions.” I was able to answer him in a manner, using terms that he would understand to calmly explain the teaches of the Church. Afterwards he said that it all made better sense to him even though he disagreed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top