R
RACJ
Guest
Honestly, if I were evaluating the Holy Shroud before the advent of photography, I would have been a skeptic. Anyone Medieval artist created this magnificent cloth to deceive his contemporaries would have been scoffed at. Yes, there have always been suckers, but to fool THEM, the intricate detail found therein would have been unnecessary.After doing a little checking it would appear that some of the greatest skeptics come from the time when the shroud first appeared. This is a very good article:
newadvent.org/cathen/13762a.htm
The sketches of it from the Medieval period show no such "brilliance". I suppose that for those expecting to see nothing but a plain yellowed shroud, the image might have been striking and "brilliant", but years ago, expecting a mighty spectacle, I was surprised to find that to the naked eye, the Holy Shroud is dull and disappointing.:rolleyes: