M
MHalsey
Guest
Since you like playing at semantics so much, Jesus didn’t live in Israel. He lived in Palestine or Judea. The nation of Israel technically speaking did not exist at the time of Jesus.Hi
We can see that Deuteronomy 34:10 mentions very clearly:"**And there arose no more a prophet in Israel **like unto Moses, whom the Lord knew face to face, in all the signs and wonders,"
and that is for future of Israel, for past (prior to Moses) and also in the times of Moses it would be just meaningless. So it pertains to future for sure, and even now in our own times whosoever reads this passage as long as OTBible is there and one who reads it their, for sure.
For Jesus it is most pertinently applicable, as he was a Jew and a Jewish Pharisee as they say, he must have read it time and again, yet he could neither delete it if he considered himself superior to Moses, nor he could issue a straight refutation of this verse with reference to it. He was, as our Catholic friends would believe, the only claimant of being superior to Moses, yet he did not fulfill this duty.
So surely he was not superior to Moses.
There arose an occasion to announce on the subject, when he wanted to show a sign to the adulterous Jews. Had he been superior to Moses or his miracles superior to the ProphetMessenger Moses? He would have said that he would show superior signs that Moses had shown as he was superior to Moses, but he chose an ordinary ProphetMessenger Jonah with no signs comparable to Moses.
My Catholic friends should pause a little here, and think unbiased; they would realize that the status of Jesus was higher to Jonah, accepted without doubt, but lesser to Moses.
Moses was the Principal Prophet who was given Torah by GodAllahYHWH and Jesus was a subordinate Prophet, as was also Jonah, who were sent to revive the Torah.
I think it is reasonable, however, no compulsion.
Thanks
Since Jesus left no written Word of GodAllahYHWH revealed on him, or authenticated by him when he last departed from Galilee; hence my Catholic friends believe many creeds created by the Catholic Clergy not originated by Jesus himself in person.
And just to beat a dead horse, the passage does not indicate there would NEVER be another. Only from the time of Moses up to the point the book was written. This is just your interpretation. And no matter how many times you post it, no Christian is going to buy it.
Think unbiased?? How is it that YOU are NOT unbiased based on your preconceived notion that the Bible has been corrupted by the Christians? If you paused to read the whole Bible with an “unbiased” outlook, you would come to see that Jesus is indeed the Son of God, Saviour, Priest, Prophet, King, and many more titles I don’t have room to type.My Catholic friends should pause a little here, and think unbiased; they would realize that the status of Jesus was higher to Jonah, accepted without doubt, but lesser to Moses.