J
jtodisco
Guest
I think there may be a miscommunication here. I have never said that the literal meaning of Scripture should be discounted or ignored. I’m simply stating that there is more than one level of meaning behind Sacred Scripture. Take just about any event in the Bible and you can see both the literal and spiritual meanings contained within it. (i.e. the crossing of the Red Sea as a prefiguration of baptism, the bread and wine of Melchizedek being symbolic of the Body and Blood of Christ, the sermon on the mount reflecting and enhancing the teaching of the Torah and Moses’ ascent and descent from the holy mountain, etc.)indeed “I would not believe in the gospel,had not the authority of the Catholic Church moved me”- Pope Leo XII in Proventissimus Deus advised " the literal and obvious sense must always be accepted unless reason or necessity dictate otherwise" - this has never been rescinded or superceded,of course he never said only the literal - twinc
While there is obvious value in knowing what literally took place when reading the Bible (and this in fact is the foundation for any later interpretations), there is also value in knowing what the Spirit is trying to tell us through these various events.