Since married people are one flesh, do you believe they have any special relationship in Heaven?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Edward345
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
This is what I wrote:

It is impossible for finite humans to even begin to comprehend the “mechanism” by which we will share in God’s INFINITY.

Please do not change what I actually wrote.
 
If you replace the word infinity with eternity, it would probably be better…
Infinity and eternity are two totally different things.

Infinity has no limits.

God has infinite dimensions, for example.

We have no idea.

Nor will we ever have any idea.

But we will marvel at what we do learn.
 
Infinity and eternity are two totally different things.

Infinity has no limits.

God has infinite dimensions, for example.

We have no idea.

Nor will we ever have any idea.

But we will marvel at what we do learn.
I’m uncomfortable with your terminology.
 
According to Catholic belief, one of the joys of heaven is being with the others who are saved, with us. Those who were married then will rejoice in the spiritual help they gave one another in life and even how they helped one another to heaven. In this way they will see one another with great joy. However, Jesus was asked one time what if a man had more than one wife, marrying again after his first wife died, or married three or four times in this way? Jesus showed that there is no difficulty with this because, as he said, there is no marriage in heaven.
 
There is no need to procreate in heaven. There is also the theological problem of one spouse in heaven and one in hell…
 
My own, purely personal, opinion, is that we will no longer be married, but that we will share relationships with the people on Earth that we loved. That includes husbands, parents, siblings, close friends. I don’t see why we would break all ties to these people once we die. However I think the relationship will be vastly different given the differences between the natural and the supernatural.

So, it’s not specifically to do with the fact that a husband and wife were one flesh, but rather for the love that one has for certain people which I think is partly spiritual perhaps?
 
John J. Kilgallen a catholic scholar has held for a long time, there would be “marriage” or the essence of marital relationships in the resurrection: “Though Jesus does not say whose wife the widow will be in the next life, **it is reasonable to assume she will be the wife of the first husband, ** whose life was ended here, but will continue forever (with her) in the resurrected life.”
Sorry, but it is not reasonable to assume that at all. The question Jesus was asked was “whose wife will she be at the resurrection?” If there was marriage after death, then all Jesus had to do to silence the Sadducees was say “the first man” and leave it at that. But he didn’t. Instead he says human beings will be like the angels, who do not marry each other.

Pretty clear.
 
Sorry, but it is not reasonable to assume that at all. The question Jesus was asked was “whose wife will she be at the resurrection?” If there was marriage after death, then all Jesus had to do to silence the Sadducees was say “the first man” and leave it at that. But he didn’t. Instead he says human beings will be like the angels, who do not marry each other.

Pretty clear.
The case put forward by the Sadducees is particularly extreme. Not only had six brothers attempted and failed to impregnate the woman in question, but she had also outlived them all and was single when she died. It is perhaps this last fact which prompts the question: Whose spouse will she be in the resurrection? …Jesus stresses that in the age to come people will neither marry nor be given in marriage. Notice what Jesus does not say. He does not say there will be no marriage in the age to come. The use of the terms “γαμουσιν” (gamousin) and “γαμιζονται” (gamizontai) is important, for these terms refer to the gender-specific roles played in early Jewish society by the man and the woman in the process of getting married. The men, being the initiators of the process in such a strongly patriarchal culture, “marry,” while the women are “given in marriage” by their father or another older family member. Thus Mark has Jesus saying that no new marriages will be initiated in the eschatological [resurrection] state. This is surely not the same as claiming that all existing marriages will disappear in the eschatological state. Jesus, then, would seem to be arguing against a specific view held by the Sadducees about the continuity between this life and the life to come, a view involving the ongoing practice of levirate marriage. In the eschatological state we have resurrected beings who are no longer able to die. Levirate marriage existed precisely because of the reality of death. When death ceases to happen, the rationale for levirate marriage falls to the ground as well. When Jesus says…that people will be like the angels in heaven in the life to come, he does not mean they will live a sexless identity (early Jews did not think angels were sexless in any case; cf. Gen. 6:1–4!), but rather that they will be like angels in that they are unable to die. Thus the question of the Sadducees is inappropriate to the conditions of the eschatological state…In Mark 10 Jesus grounded normal marriage in the creation order, not in the order of the fall, which is the case with levirate marriage (instituted because of death and childlessness and the need to preserve the family name and line). Thus Jesus is intending to deny about the eschatological state “that there will be any natural relation out of which the difficulty of the Sadducees could arise.” Some New Testament scholars put it this way.
 
I think this is not anti-scriptural. In fact, to me it seems more in line with the core teachings of scripture about what happens in a true marriage: the two become one.

In a perfect world, when God did the pairing, no law was needed. I think Adam and Eve were made to be man and wife while they were in an immortal state intended to be forever without death.
 
The poster raised the question of married people being one flesh, which of course is true in marriage. However, when one spouse dies they can marry again. According to the Catholic view this particular unity ends with death, or they could not remarry and become one flesh with a new spouse in a Catholic marriage. And so with death, the marriage bond established when they married comes to an end.
In any case, people in marriage do become one flesh. But those who have died do not have bodies at all now. They don’t have bodies until the resurrection of the dead. They can’r very well be one flesh with a spouse when they have died when they don’t have bodies.
This is not to say they people don’t have any spiritual relationship with people they had married. But you would have to be careful when saying what sort of relationship this would be. If a woman or a man had three or four husbands, each of whom had died before each remarriage. they couldn’t have a unique relationship with each of this group. --Not though that they would not have Christian love and respect in heaven for each of the person they had married.
 
Our only relationship in heaven will be with God.
That’s not true at all. We will have relationships with the Saints and Mary and the Angels.

To answer the OP’s question. I do think there will be different relationships in heaven. I think that the people that we know in life: family, good friends, spouse or children will have special relationships with us still. Since heaven is a physical place and a continuation and fulfillment of this life, we will have the memory of all our interactions with family and friends. It would make sense that our lives in heaven will reflect something of the relationships we had in this life.
 
:confused: I know we pray to the Holy Family…and if we make it to heaven someday we will be saints too, so another confusing thread for me…are Mary and Joseph still married in heaven?

Perhaps death do us part means until our spouse joins us or something…
 
:confused: I know we pray to the Holy Family…and if we make it to heaven someday we will be saints too, so another confusing thread for me…are Mary and Joseph still married in heaven?

Perhaps death do us part means until our spouse joins us or something…
Marriage in the earthly sense as someone stated before has to do with procreation. In heaven, you will probably still love your earthly spouse but there will not be a physical relationship.
 
Marriage in the earthly sense as someone stated before has to do with procreation. In heaven, you will probably still love your earthly spouse but there will not be a physical relationship.
God did not give sexuality in the beginning only for the purpose of procreation.I see no reason why sexual expression of love would not be a reality in the life to come. Even if there are no children in the life to come, reproduction is not the primary reason God gave marriage in the beginning. The primary purpose for marriage was partnership, and that purpose will not be gone in the next life, regardless of whether or not we will still be having children. Therefore, I see no reason why it should not be continued.
 
God did not give sexuality in the beginning only for the purpose of procreation.I see no reason why sexual expression of love would not be a reality in the life to come. Even if there are no children in the life to come, reproduction is not the primary reason God gave marriage in the beginning. The primary purpose for marriage was partnership, and that purpose will not be gone in the next life, regardless of whether or not we will still be having children. Therefore, I see no reason why it should not be continued.
Actually, the purpose of marriage is to get each other to heaven, and to bring about Christ’s love for the church here on earth. Marriage is an icon the points us to the reality of heaven.

Marital relations is a renewing of the wedding vows, free, total, faithful, and fruitful, it brings about grace.

This is not needed in heaven- we no longer need the icon to point to heaven, because we are there.
 
God did not give sexuality in the beginning only for the purpose of procreation.I see no reason why sexual expression of love would not be a reality in the life to come. Even if there are no children in the life to come, reproduction is not the primary reason God gave marriage in the beginning. The primary purpose for marriage was partnership, and that purpose will not be gone in the next life, regardless of whether or not we will still be having children. Therefore, I see no reason why it should not be continued.
This is a skewed understanding of sexuality and marriage. It is a product of living in a world that redefines sex and marriage.
 
God did not give sexuality in the beginning only for the purpose of procreation.I see no reason why sexual expression of love would not be a reality in the life to come. Even if there are no children in the life to come, reproduction is not the primary reason God gave marriage in the beginning. The primary purpose for marriage was partnership, and that purpose will not be gone in the next life, regardless of whether or not we will still be having children. Therefore, I see no reason why it should not be continued.
We don’t know what our resurrected bodies will be like, save that we will neither marry nor be given in marriage. The perpetual Virginity of Our Lady certainly suggests that sexual relations will not be in any way necessary and may easily have no part at all in the Beatific Vision.

Having said that, “eye has not seen…”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top