Singlehood as vocation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nabooru
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Excellent article, Safia, and from a reliable Catholic source in the main:
Quoting from the article in part: "
Single vocation means that each person has a unique mission in life and that is why it is called single. The word single [Lat. *singulus
(single)] means simple, unique. But it also means “unmarried.” Single men and women are called by God to serve the Church, the bride of Christ, to whom they are wedded from the moment they are baptized. Single vocation, therefore, means a unique call.

The Church needs lay Catholics who can dedicate themselves to their work and the spread of the Gospel while working in the world. Single laymen and laywomen have greater flexibility and time to do a variety of tasks and to help other families. Those who are called to live the single, celibate life should be encouraged and given moral support by the representatives of the ecclesiastical hierarchy, since every one is called to holiness. “What the soul is in the body, let Christians be in the world.” (Lumen Gentium, p. 396.)

The Apostolic exhortation Christifideles laici confirms that the unmarried state of lay life is a courageous response of vocational action and a magnificent opportunity for apostolic expenditure, especially in the times, conditions, and circumstances of the post-modern era. The single lay person carries out his or her apostolate by virtue of his or her special vocational status, growing in intimate union with the Divine Spouse, Our Lord. God the Father placed before them the temporal means of His own sanctification: human labor. Human labor serves men and women as both a natural and supernatural means to sustain and maintain themselves, contributing to God’s plan of salvation. “As each has received a gift, employ it for one another, as good stewards of God’s varied grace.” (1 Peter 4:10).

The Church is suffering from a lack of vocations to the priesthood and religious life although there are some signs of hope in places. The Church also suffers from a lack of ordinary everyday lay people who are willing to consecrate themselves to The Gospel and discipleship of Jesus as committed and faithful Catholics, and are aware of a call to do so. Unless such a vocation and call including to the single chaste celibate state and for the sake of The Gospel/Kingdom gains some recognition as it is doing so today, the state will not be recognized and the awareness of the call, as a true call and vocation from God.

We need also lay people who in no way are separated from the general community by overt recognition as Catholics by dress or overt lifestyle to take The Gospel into the ordinary everyday community, including places of employment and also places of entertainment. What is lacking is formation on how to go about it.

There is a mentality that can abound even that such totally committed discipleship belongs only in the priesthood and religious life and that the laity have only the obligation to attend Mass on Sunday, Confession once yearly and to support The Church and the missions financially. Catholicism and the discipleship of our Baptismal vocation is much more than that, but it needs to be stressed to the laity and formation available on the vocation of the laity.

Of interest for the purposes of this thread only, the majority do recognize the single chaste celibate state as a potential call and vocation from God and very heartening. This is not to in any way take away one iota from the importance and holiness of the vocation and call to either the priesthood or religious life, rather laity have an obligation to understand these vocations and their importance and the supernatural gift of chaste celibacy and to be able to share their understanding wherever needed.

In the Doctrine of The Mystical Body, the gift to one is a gift to all, the Whole Body of Christ, just as the failings of one is a failing in the Whole Body of Christ. We need to shift our understanding from total individual-ness, of self alone, to a grasp and internalization of The Doctrine of The Mystical Body.
 
These comments overlook the fact (see statement from Paul VI below) that our baptism is of itself a call and vocation to holiness and that any further call is a call to how that baptismal vocation is to be lived out.

vatican.va/holy_father/pa…otalis_en.html

Comments that the single state of chaste celibacy (or that of the baptised) is not a vocation also overlooks those who have impediments to religious life and/or the priesthood and could not enter these states even if they felt personally that they are called and they may never experience a call to marriage. God does not leave these people without a vocation since our baptism is a vocation.

Your comments: " Marriage, ordination and religious vows (including consecrated virgins) alter a person permanently and one can not just choose to exit these states as you can singlehood." Nor can a person just exit the vows of our baptism - it is a permanent state of life and call to holiness, discipleship of Jesus and the following of His Gospel within The Church.

Nowhere has Rome stated that one must either marry or enter religious life or the priesthood to have a “vocation” per se in life. And comments that one must change one’s state in life are thus contrary to Rome. One can either cling to one’s own personal concepts, or those of Rome and The Holy Father.
The state of baptized Christian is the same for all, married, single, clergy and religious. Of course single people share in that vocation, no one is saying otherwise. And, single people may well be able to live out that vocation in specific ways difficult or unavailable to the married.

What I am saying is that there is no additional vocation to be single and a layman. God does not specifically call people to remain single, while not entering any form of consecrated life. People may remain single, either by choice, or through inability to find a suitable spouse, and that’s spiritually fine. But it’s not something God asks people to do.

God Bless
 
The state of baptized Christian is the same for all, married, single, clergy and religious. Of course single people share in that vocation, no one is saying otherwise. And, single people may well be able to live out that vocation in specific ways difficult or unavailable to the married.

What I am saying is that there is no additional vocation to be single and a layman. God does not specifically call people to remain single, while not entering any form of consecrated life. People may remain single, either by choice, or through inability to find a suitable spouse, and that’s spiritually fine. But it’s not something God asks people to do.

God Bless
You would be in disagreement with what is probably by now very thankfully in the majority of Catholic thought, and are absolutely free to disagree. We can agree to disagree!👍

catholicozvocations.org.au/Home/My-Vocation/Single-Life (Catholic Vocations Minsitry)
presentationministries.com/brochures/Single.asp (This text has the Nihil Obstat and Imprimatur)

And on many more quite reputable Catholic sites all of which quote the single chaste celibate state as a potential call and vocation, invitation, from God, as well as those who have actually experienced such a call.

God bless you also and have a great day!🙂
 
“Singlehood” is only a “vocation” when it is in teh context of religious/consecrated/ordained life. Otherwise, it is just a “state of life”, not a vocation.
This is so absolutely and totally wrong. I know both men and women who are consecrated celibates or virgins, and live very full and normal lives as lay people.

Tell these woman that their lives are not in proper context: Uniged States Association of Consecrated Virgins

~Liza
 
No baptized person is without a very personal call and invitation from The Lord to a particular work in His Vineyard, including to remain in the single chaste celibate state and for the sake of The Gospel/The Kingdom. One can disagree if one chooses but would be disagreeing with sound Catholic thinking, including in many documents out of Rome going back to Pope Pius XII and pre V2. I dont have time just now to post all in my files, but will if necessary at a later date:

vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/apost_exhortations/documents/hf_jp-ii_exh_30121988_christifideles-laici_en.html
POST-SYNODAL
APOSTOLIC EXHORTATION
CHRISTIFIDELES LAICI
OF
HIS HOLINESS
JOHN PAUL II
  1. THE LAY MEMBERS of Christ’s Faithful People (Christifideles Laici), whose “Vocation and Mission in the Church and in the World Twenty Years after the Second Vatican Council” was the topic of the 1987 Synod of Bishops, are those who form that part of the People of God which might be likened to the labourers in the vineyard mentioned in Matthew’s Gospel: “For the Kingdom of heaven is like a householder who went out early in the morning to hire labourers for his vineyard. After agreeing with the labourers for a denarius a day, he sent them into his vineyard” (Mt 20:1-2).
    The gospel parable sets before our eyes the Lord’s vast vineyard and the multitude of persons, both women and men, who are called and sent forth by him to labour in it. The vineyard is the whole world (cf. Mt 13:38), which is to be transformed according to the plan of God in view of the final coming of the Kingdom of God.
    You go too. The call is a concern not only of Pastors, clergy, and men and women religious. The call is addressed to everyone: lay people as well
    are personally called
    by the Lord, from whom they receive a mission on behalf of the Church and the world. In preaching to the people Saint Gregory the Great recalls this fact and comments on the parable of the labourers in the vineyard: “Keep watch over your manner of life, dear people, and make sure that you are indeed the Lord’s labourers. Each person should take into account what he does and consider if he is labouring in the vineyard of the Lord”(2).
Indeed as a person with a truly unique lifestory, each is called by name, to make a special contribution to the coming of the Kingdom of God. No talent, no matter how small, is to be hidden or left unused (cf.* Mt* 25:24-27).
 
SACERDOTALIS CAELIBATUS
ENCYCLICAL OF POPE PAUL VI
ON THE CELIBACY OF THE PRIEST
vatican.va/holy_father/pa…otalis_en.html

It is obvious in reading Church documents that The Church has a much broader understanding of what “vocation” means, rather than a strictly limited view as some propose from their own concepts only:

Catholic Catechism:

But those who hold to a strictly limited view of “vocation” will, it seems, continue to hold to that as the discussion on the single baptised state in life as a vocation goes round and round…and round, despite quotations from Church documents challenging that limited view by what is stated in various documents. Of course, if one wants to hold to the strictly limited view one may; however, it is not the Church’s view.
If there is a CA ruling that the limited view is to apply in the Vocations Forum, then CA is completely free to make such a ruling and applicable to CA only.
This particular subforum is not about general baptismal vocations to holiness, etc., that every baptized person has; it is about marriage and ordained/religious life - at least that is what the description states.
 
You would be in disagreement with what is probably by now very thankfully in the majority of Catholic thought, and are absolutely free to disagree. We can agree to disagree!👍

catholicozvocations.org.au/Home/My-Vocation/Single-Life (Catholic Vocations Minsitry)
presentationministries.com/brochures/Single.asp (This text has the Nihil Obstat and Imprimatur)

And on many more quite reputable Catholic sites all of which quote the single chaste celibate state as a potential call and vocation, invitation, from God, as well as those who have actually experienced such a call.

God bless you also and have a great day!🙂
The “majority of Catholic thought” does not guarantee correctness. Remember, the Arian heresy was estimated to have the majority of the Catholic Church behind it, including a majority of clergy, but they were still wrong.
 
This is so absolutely and totally wrong. I know both men and women who are consecrated celibates or virgins, and live very full and normal lives as lay people.

Tell these woman that their lives are not in proper context: Uniged States Association of Consecrated Virgins

~Liza
But they are consecrated, which is a subset of “virginity for the sake of the kingdom”. As I stated previously, that is the only context in which “single” is actually a vocation.
 
The “majority of Catholic thought” does not guarantee correctness. Remember, the Arian heresy was estimated to have the majority of the Catholic Church behind it, including a majority of clergy, but they were still wrong.
I agree that “majority of Catholic thought” is no guarantee of correctness. We rely on what The Church teaches. To date, I have quoted Church Documents to support what I am saying, but those that disagree seem to only quote their own concepts and no guarantee of correctness either.
Can you quote some Church Document or statement that says “vocation” is always within The Church strictly limited to certain states in life - excluding the lay single chaste celibate state that has a commitment to some work or mission of The Church? i.e. “for the sake of The Kingdom”

Insofar as I can see:
http://forums.catholic-questions.org/images/icons/icon1.gif Welcome to the Vocations Forum!
Welcome to the Vocations Forum – this is the forum section providing a place to both inquire about, and provide information for, discernment or experience regarding vocations in service to the church, i.e., monks, priests, sisters, diaconate, canon lawyers, etc.
There have been numerous threads on the “single chaste celibate lay state” into CA over a period, years I think, and insofar as I am aware, none have been closed or transferred to another forum as irrelevant to the Vocations Forum. You may request same for sure - and no problems here. I am quite willing to discuss the single chaste celibate lay state anywhere at all. And I have no problems at all with the fact that Catholic Answers Forums have the right to set rules relating to each forum. Personally, I haven’t initated threads on the single lay state in life, rather responded to posts into existing threads.

If a moderator will close the thread and transfer it to another forum, then the matter will probably be settled once and for all insofar as CA and the Vocations Forum is concerned.

God bless and have a great day!🙂
 
This particular subforum is not about general baptismal vocations to holiness, etc., that every baptized person has; it is about marriage and it is about marriage and ordained/religious life - at least that is what the description states.
The vocation that I am speaking about is not the general baptismal vocation to holiness alone, rather it is a call from God to live out that baptismal vocation to holiness in a very specific manner with a quite specific mission - just the same as for consecrated life or the priesthood etc. in which God calls individuals to fulfill their baptismal vocation to holiness in a very specific manner with a specific mission. The difference is that in the latter the state in life changes. In the former it does not.
Where does The Church state that one MUST be called to change one’s state in life in order to be invited by God to a “vocation” per se in Church understanding?
 
Can you quote some Church Document or statement that says “vocation” is always within The Church strictly limited to certain states in life - excluding the lay single chaste celibate state that has a commitment to some work or mission of The Church? i.e. “for the sake of The Kingdom”
Would the CCC suffice? Because in all the statements about states of life (marriage, single, priesthood, religious, etc.), the only ones that are considered vocations in the CCC are marriage and “virginity for the sake of the kingdom” (which is clarified as “priestly ministry” and “consecrated life”). Nowhere in the CCC is mere singlehood (apart from “virginity for the sake of the kingdom”) considered a vocation on par with marriage and “virginity for the sake of the kingdom”. Additionally, singles (outside of “virginity for the sake of the kingdom”) have no vows to “lock” them into their single state (private vows you mentioned earlier are most likely a subset of the “consecrated life” subset of “virginity for the sake of the kingdom”), whereas married and ordained people do (as do a good chunk of religious/other celibates, like consecrated virgins); singles can later be married or ordained, whereas married men cannot be ordained (in the Latin Rite), and ordained men cannot marry (without first being laicized); similarly for others that require a vow/promise of celibacy.
 
The vocation that I am speaking about is not the general baptismal vocation to holiness alone, rather it is a call from God to live out that baptismal vocation to holiness in a very specific manner with a quite specific mission - just the same as for consecrated life or the priesthood etc. in which God calls individuals to fulfill their baptismal vocation to holiness in a very specific manner with a specific mission. The difference is that in the latter the state in life changes. In the former it does not.
Where does The Church state that one MUST be called to change one’s state in life in order to be invited by God to a “vocation” per se in Church understanding?
I think you just answered the question in the last part of your post with your statement in the first?
 
There have been a number of threads on the vocation of single laity.

Single Life - a higher vocation?
Vocation of singleness?
From Lumen gentium:
Furthermore, married couples and Christian parents should follow their own proper path (to holiness) by faithful love. They should sustain one another in grace throughout the entire length of their lives. They should embue their offspring, lovingly welcomed as God’s gift, with Christian doctrine and the evangelical virtues. In this manner, they offer all men the example of unwearying and generous love; in this way they build up the brotherhood of charity; in so doing, they stand as the witnesses and cooperators in the fruitfulness of Holy Mother Church; by such lives, they are a sign and a participation in that very love, with which Christ loved His Bride and for which He delivered Himself up for her.(11*) A like example, but one given in a different way, is that offered by widows and single people, who are able to make great contributions toward holiness and apostolic endeavor in the Church. Finally, those who engage in labor—and frequently it is of a heavy nature—should better themselves by their human labors. They should be of aid to their fellow citizens. They should raise all of society, and even creation itself, to a better mode of existence. Indeed, they should imitate by their lively charity, in their joyous hope and by their voluntary sharing of each others’ burdens, the very Christ who plied His hands with carpenter’s tools and Who in union with His Father, is continually working for the salvation of all men. In this, then, their daily work they should climb to the heights of holiness and apostolic activity.
 
Thank you, bearer.

vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/apost_exhortations/documents/hf_jp-ii_exh_30121988_christifideles-laici_en.html
POST-SYNODAL
APOSTOLIC EXHORTATION
CHRISTIFIDELES LAICI
OF
HIS HOLINESS
JOHN PAUL II
These offer the lay faithful, and even priests, the possibility of professing the evangelical counsels of poverty, chastity and obedience through vows or promises, while fully maintaining one’s lay or clerical state(204). In this regard the Synod Fathers have commented,** “The Holy Spirit** stirs up other forms of self-giving to which people who remain fully in the lay state devote themselves”(205).
***To Discover and Live One’s Vocation and Mission ***
58. The fundamental objective of the formation of the lay faithful is an ever-clearer discovery of one’s vocation and the ever-greater willingness to live it so as to fulfil one’s mission.
*God calls me and sends me forth *as a labourer in his vineyard. He calls me and sends me forth to work for the coming of his Kingdom in history. This personal vocation and mission defines the dignity and the responsibility of each member of the lay faithful and makes up the focal point of the whole work of formation, whose purpose is the joyous and grateful recognition of this dignity and the faithful and generous living-out of this responsibility.

“The secular character of the lay faithful is not therefore to be defined only in a sociological sense, but most especially in a theological sense. The term *secular *must be understood in light of the act of God the creator and redeemer, who has handed over the world to women and men, so that they may participate in the work of creation, free creation from the influence of sin and sanctify themselves in marriage or the celibate life, in a family, in a profession and in the various activities of society”(39).

An Appeal and A Prayer
64. At the conclusion of this post-Synodal document I once again put forward the invitation of “the householder”, proposed in the gospel: *You go into my vineyard too. *It can be said that the significance of the Synod on the vocation and mission of the lay faithful might very well consist in this call of the Lord which he addresses to eueryone, yet, in a particular way to the lay faithful, both women and men.
 
Would the CCC suffice? Because in all the statements about states of life (marriage, single, priesthood, religious, etc.), the only ones that are considered vocations in the CCC are marriage and “virginity for the sake of the kingdom” (which is clarified as “priestly ministry” and “consecrated life”). Nowhere in the CCC is mere singlehood (apart from “virginity for the sake of the kingdom”) considered a vocation on par with marriage and “virginity for the sake of the kingdom”. Additionally, singles (outside of “virginity for the sake of the kingdom”) have no vows to “lock” them into their single state (private vows you mentioned earlier are most likely a subset of the “consecrated life” subset of “virginity for the sake of the kingdom”), whereas married and ordained people do (as do a good chunk of religious/other celibates, like consecrated virgins); singles can later be married or ordained, whereas married men cannot be ordained (in the Latin Rite), and ordained men cannot marry (without first being laicized); similarly for others that require a vow/promise of celibacy.
The section to which you are referring in the CCC is specifically on “Consecrated Life” only. Not one word about vocation - only in connection with laity. Now I am not stating in anyway whatsoever that the consecrated life in all its forms as well, of course, as the priesthood are not vocations - AND NEITHER IS THE CCC I AM SURE!
“Single” is word used commonly in the general community to indicated the unmarried. In Church terms, what is most often used is “lay celibate” or “celibacy in the lay state” and similar terminology.

**Paragraph 4. Christ’s Faithful - Hierarchy, Laity, Consecrated Life **

If you scroll back from the section on “Consecrated Life”, you will find the section on :

**II. THE LAY FAITHFUL **
897 "The term ‘laity’ is here understood to mean all the faithful except those in Holy Orders and those who belong to a religious state approved by the Church. That is, the faithful, who by Baptism are incorporated into Christ and integrated into the People of God, are made sharers in their particular way in the priestly, prophetic, and kingly office of Christ, and have their own part to play in the mission of the whole Christian people in the Church and in the World."430
**The vocation of lay people : **(go to the link given below to read this section on the vocation of lay people)

All that above can be found here**: **http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/p123a9p4.htm#926

I have never suggested that a consecrated state of life and also Holy Orders are on a ‘par’ with the call to lay celibacy. No comparison! The consecrated state of life in all its various expressions and certainly Holy Orders are very special and holy by their very nature, as is Marriage, which is also a Sacrament. What I have been saying is that one can be called (vocation) to lay celibacy for the sake of The Kingdom. Any similarity is simply that an individual is called by God to a certain state in life whatever it is with a special mission in service of God and His Church. Some others are called to very special and holy states in life in The Church.
The lay celibate person is asked to undertake a certain anonimity for want of a better expression at this point. A ‘lowly and unremarkable place’ (as it were) in the life of The Church. Although my personal experience is that there is much curiosity in the general community about a person who does not seek to marry and professes Catholicism, yet is not a religious nor in Holy Orders. This real curiosity can be taken up as an opportunity for evangalism.
 
“Singlehood” is only a “vocation” when it is in teh context of religious/consecrated/ordained life. Otherwise, it is just a “state of life”, not a vocation.
EXACTLY! It’s what I’ve said all along! Thank you!

I’m single myself, and at this stage of the game, I’m going to end up being this way until the end of my days.

I’m ‘too old’ [on ‘the other side of 55’] to marry (never had any desire for it), and all, or most, of any of the ‘good’ Orders in the Church won’t even LOOK at someone my age! Besides that, single people are pretty much ‘benignly ignored and benevolently neglected’ in the Church, anyway. It’s only if you’re smart and the ‘organizing’ type that any attention is paid to you.

The only way that singlehood is considered a ‘vocation’ is when it’s dedicated or consecrated in some way (consecrated virgin or hermit comes to mind here).

Sorry if I sound cynical…I guess I just feel like ‘you-know-what’ today…😦
 
EXACTLY! It’s what I’ve said all along! Thank you!

I’m single myself, and at this stage of the game, I’m going to end up being this way until the end of my days.

I’m ‘too old’ [on ‘the other side of 55’] to marry (never had any desire for it), and all, or most, of any of the ‘good’ Orders in the Church won’t even LOOK at someone my age! Besides that, single people are pretty much ‘benignly ignored and benevolently neglected’ in the Church, anyway. It’s only if you’re smart and the ‘organizing’ type that any attention is paid to you.

The only way that singlehood is considered a ‘vocation’ is when it’s dedicated or consecrated in some way (consecrated virgin or hermit comes to mind here).

Sorry if I sound cynical…I guess I just feel like ‘you-know-what’ today…😦
Besides that, single people are pretty much ‘benignly ignored and benevolently neglected’ in the Church,
I agree. And because of this many lay people feel that they don’t have a vocation and go along to Mass on Sunday and the other regulations governing Catholics to save them from mortal sin and that this is the required sum total of their Catholicism often. They can feel that commitment, The Gospel and discipleship of Jesus - and an active spiritual life…that these latter are the sole requirement of and only for priests and forms of consecrated life, Third Orders etc.

Church documents spell out very clearly that the laity DO have a vocation and an important and essential one to The Church and The Gospel - and they spell it out for us in great detail. But in the day to day a committed celibate chaste lay person may find oneself with a daunting sense of ‘abandoned’ by The Church and perhaps especially those in an older age bracket, and even particuarly women. But never abandonment of any kind by The Lord. Never!

I hope that you day will really look up!👍 I have those ‘you know what’ type of days too.
 
If you want, Barb, you can write to the Pontifical Council for The Laity - website:
laici.va/content/laici/en.html
There is also an email address on the website
Contact us

Pontifical Council for the Laity
- A Dicastery of the Roman Curia at the service of the Laity
Palazzo San Calisto a Trastevere (Piazza San Calisto, 16 00153 Roma)

Postal Address: Pontifical Council for the Laity - Palazzo San Calisto - 00120 Vatican City State
Phone: +39 06 69869300 Fax: +39 06 69887214 Email: info@laici.va

Tigger
 
The section to which you are referring in the CCC is specifically on “Consecrated Life” only. Not one word about vocation - only in connection with laity. Now I am not stating in anyway whatsoever that the consecrated life in all its forms as well, of course, as the priesthood are not vocations - AND NEITHER IS THE CCC I AM SURE!
“Single” is word used commonly in the general community to indicated the unmarried. In Church terms, what is most often used is “lay celibate” or “celibacy in the lay state” and similar terminology.

**Paragraph 4. Christ’s Faithful - Hierarchy, Laity, Consecrated Life **

If you scroll back from the section on “Consecrated Life”, you will find the section on :

**II. THE LAY FAITHFUL **
897 "The term ‘laity’ is here understood to mean all the faithful except those in Holy Orders and those who belong to a religious state approved by the Church. That is, the faithful, who by Baptism are incorporated into Christ and integrated into the People of God, are made sharers in their particular way in the priestly, prophetic, and kingly office of Christ, and have their own part to play in the mission of the whole Christian people in the Church and in the World."430
The vocation of lay people : (go to the link given below to read this section on the vocation of lay people)

All that above can be found here**: **http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/p123a9p4.htm#926

I have never suggested that a consecrated state of life and also Holy Orders are on a ‘par’ with the call to lay celibacy. No comparison! The consecrated state of life in all its various expressions and certainly Holy Orders are very special and holy by their very nature, as is Marriage, which is also a Sacrament. What I have been saying is that one can be called (vocation) to lay celibacy for the sake of The Kingdom. Any similarity is simply that an individual is called by God to a certain state in life whatever it is with a special mission in service of God and His Church. Some others are called to very special and holy states in life in The Church.
The lay celibate person is asked to undertake a certain anonimity for want of a better expression at this point. A ‘lowly and unremarkable place’ (as it were) in the life of The Church. Although my personal experience is that there is much curiosity in the general community about a person who does not seek to marry and professes Catholicism, yet is not a religious nor in Holy Orders. This real curiosity can be taken up as an opportunity for evangalism.
CCC 2233 (second part): “Parents should welcome and respect with joy and thanksgiving the Lord’s call to one of their children to follow him in virginity for the sake of the Kingdom in the consecrated life or in priestly ministry”.

Two points:
  1. “Virginity for the sake of the kingdom” is considered a “call” from the Lord, in other words, a vocation from God.
  2. The call (i.e., vocation) from the Lord to “virginity for the sake of the kingdom” is subdivided into priestly ministry or consecrated life.
So, according to the CCC, people can be called by the Lord to “virginity for the sake of the kingdom”

We also see in CCC 1603 the mention that the vocation to marriage is written into our very nature.

So, we see “marriage” and “virginity for the sake of the Kingdom” considered as vocations that God calls people to.

What of single people that are not consecrated? CCC 1658 refers to single people who are close to Jesus’ heart, and CCC 2231 refers to people who forgo marriage to care for parents, give themselves to a profession, or “serve other honorable ends”. But nowhere does the CCC say that this is a vocation that they God calls them to, like He calls people to marriage (by our very nature) or “virginity for the sake of the kingdom”.

Do unconsecrated single have a baptismal vocation to holiness to strive for heaven? Of course. So do maried people, priests, religious, consecrated people. EVERYONE does.

Do unconsecrated single people have the “vocation of the laity”? Yes. So do married people.

But that does not mean that “single” is a vocation that God calls people to (outside of “virginity for the sake of the Kingdom”).
 
I think Norseman, in view of the exchanges we have had in this thread that we can certainly agree to disagree:🙂
a
vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/apost_exhortations/documents/hf_jp-ii_exh_25031996_vita-consecrata_en.html
POST-SYNODAL
APOSTOLIC EXHORTATION
***VITA CONSECRATA ***
OF THE HOLY FATHER
JOHN PAUL II
TO THE BISHOPS AND CLERGY
RELIGIOUS ORDERS AND CONGREGATIONS
SOCIETIES OF APOSTOLIC LIFE
SECULAR INSTITUTES
AND ALL THE FAITHFUL
ON THE CONSECRATED LIFE AND ITS MISSION
IN THE CHURCH AND IN THE WORLD
Together let us thank God
for the Religious Orders and Institutes devoted to contemplation or the works of the apostolate, for Societies of Apostolic Life, for Secular Institutes and for other groups of consecrated persons, as well as for all those individuals who, in their inmost hearts, dedicate themselves to God by a special consecration

Why give thanks to God for something that does not come from God? - and in a document that is about “the consecrated life and its mission in The Church and the world”? - rather than a document relating to laity?

All that is good and positive in our universe has its origin in God :
James Chapter 1 “Every good gift and every perfect gift comes down from above, from the Father of lights, with whom is no variation nor shadow of turning.”
Therefore, if a person feels a call to the lay celibate chaste state in life, and it does not come from God. (and person has confirmation from spiritual director (ongoing) and an Archbishop in writing on diocesan letterhead) then what is the origin of this felt call and vocation? - to refer to Scripture and our theology. Such a call is NOT the consecrated state rather the lay state in life; however the Holy Father Pope John Paul II felt that it should be mentioned in a document about the consecrated life, though it is a personal consecration not an offical Church consecration. Nor does the document refer to virgins specifically but to “all those individuals”

We are just going to have to agree to disagree.🙂 I have posted quite a few links for the curious.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top