2
I am not sure I understand your question, or as I have detected as a pattern in your posts, the tendency to throw out a topic starter, with varying degrees of accuracy concerning the underlying premise.
From the 39 articles:I am not sure I understand your question, or as I have detected as a pattern in your posts, the tendency to throw out a topic starter, with varying degrees of accuracy concerning the underlying premise.
If the question is whether or not the compilers of the KJV considered the Deuterocanonicals to be on the same level of scripture according to the 39 articles, clearly that answer is no,
So if it’s “not” the inspired Word of God, how could they have “added” it to The Word of God?I am not sure I understand your question, or as I have detected as a pattern in your posts, the tendency to throw out a topic starter, with varying degrees of accuracy concerning the underlying premise.
If the question is whether or not the compilers of the KJV considered the Deuterocanonicals to be on the same level of scripture according to the 39 articles, clearly that answer is no,
So they kept The Holy Bible, but just decided that The Deuterocanonical Books that establish Catholicisms Doctrines were no longer canonical then, right?From the 39 articles:
Article VI
Of the sufficiency of the Holy Scripture for Salvation
Holy Scripture containeth all things necessary to salvation: so that whatsoever is not read therein, nor may be proved thereby, is not to be required of any man, that it should be believed as an article of the faith, or be thought requisite or necessary to salvation.
In the name of Holy Scripture, we do understand those Canonical books of the Old and New testament, of whose authority was never any doubt in the Church.
Of the names and number of the Canonical Books.
Genesis.
Exodus.
Leviticus.
Numbers.
Deuteronomy
Joshua.
Judges.
Ruth.
The First Book of Samuel.
The Second Book of Samuel.
The First Book of Kings.
The Second Book of Kings.
The First Book of Chronicles.
The Second Book of Chronicles.
The First Book of Esdras.
The Second Book of Esdras.
The Book of Esther.
The Book of Job.
The Psalms.
The Proverbs.
Ecclesiastes, or the Preacher.
Cantica, or Songs of Solomon.
Four Prophets the Greater.
Twelve Prophets the Less.
All the books of the New Testament, as they are commonly received, we do receive, and account them canonical.
And the other books (as Hierome saith) the Church doth read for example of life and instruction of manners; but yet doth it not apply them to establish any doctrine. Such are these following:
The Third Book of Esdras.
The Fourth Book of Esdras.
The Book of Tobias.
The Book of Judith.
The rest of the Book of Esther.
The Book of Wisdom.
Jesus the Son of Sirach.
Baruch the Prophet.
The Song of the Three Children.
The Story of Susanna.
Of Bel and the Dragon.
The Prayer of Manasses.
The First Book of Maccabees.
The Second Book of Maccabees.
From your lips to God’s ears.On a sidenote, I saw an original King James Version reprint at the bookstore the other day–complete with the seven deuterocanonicals and a few apocrypha. I’m happy, and I hope this practice becomes more commonplace. It would allow Protestants to read the books for themselves without feeling guilty. The NRSV ecumenical bibles have the apocrypha and deuterocanon. I’m hoping this practice will be resurrected in order to familiarize all the faithful, whether Catholics or otherwise, with these wonderful books.
To the best of my knowledge they didn’t deem them canonical/inspired but kept them because “…the Church doth read for example of life and instruction of manners; but yet doth it not apply them to establish any doctrine.”So they kept The Holy Bible, but just decided that The Deuterocanonical Books that establish Catholicisms Doctrines were no longer canonical then, right?
Or “they’re not The Word of God, but we’ll keep them anyway.”
Using them and accepting them as God breathed are two different things.From your lips to God’s ears.
Little known fact is that The Reformers used them,
but it was The Protestants that took them out a hundred years later.
From your lips to God’s ears.
Little known fact is that The Reformers used them,
but it was The Protestants that took them out a hundred years later.
Where is that a quote from?To the best of my knowledge they didn’t deem them canonical/inspired but kept them because “…the Church doth read for example of life and instruction of manners; but yet doth it not apply them to establish any doctrine.”
You’re right. Not one. But hundreds…One thing to remember:
There is not a SINGLE Christian manuscript of the Old Testament that does not have the Deuterocanonicals. Not One.
Rom. 3:14 / Psalm 10:7 - whose mouth is full of curses and “bitterness.” Hebrew - cursing and “deceit and oppression.”One thing to remember:
There is not a SINGLE Christian manuscript of the Old Testament that does not have the Deuterocanonicals. Not One.
No, The Reformers were Apostate Catholics. Anyone who came after them that were baptized by their varioius churches were Protestants.The Reformers were Protestant. ISTM you may be thinking of John Lightfoot’s remark in 1643 about the “wretched Apocrypha”.
At least in the UK, they were bound up with the (rest of the) Bible until 1827 (IIRC).
Who decided “what” was God breathed?Using them and accepting them as God breathed are two different things.
God.Who decided “what” was God breathed?
So?One thing to remember:
There is not a SINGLE Christian manuscript of the Old Testament that does not have the Deuterocanonicals. Not One.
So if you can’t trust them for the canon, how do you trust them for the text?
There loss. We’ve Orthodox: we’re not beholding to the Glossa’s mistakes.The Glossa Ordinaire included the deutero’s but rejected their canonical status.
Yes, Jerome was the first to move the mark his Fathers had set, following the tradtions of the Phariseesa, Sadducees and Scribes instead of the Apostles, and translated from A (not the Masoretic, which didn’t exist yet) text. And St. Augustine castigated him for it.The vulgate was sent out complete with Jeromes negative comments attached to the preface of each deuterocanonical book.