Skeptics...question for you

  • Thread starter Thread starter john330
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I think you’re straining the credibility of evidence there - as I understand it that’s what the girl who claimed Mary spoke to her wrote 24 years later.

There were 37 million casualties of WWI and then another 60 million of WWII. God (or Mary) could have softened hearts, stopped the mechanized slaughter, and established far, far more devotion in the world by placing the miracle over the battlefield at Ypres.

By that one small change of location God could have stopped war for ever and made all of us devoted Catholics. Those who believe in the miracle need to explain why an all-loving God didn’t do that obvious thing, and instead gave every appearance of turning His back by putting on a polite little light show in the middle of nowhere.
Our Lady said at Fatima that “Wars are a punishment from God for sin.” That " polite little light show in the middle of nowhere" is one factor in an apparition that has spread devotion and prayer to millions since then, so it is not an isolated event even in the least.
 
That could well be.

What doesn’t convince me about the strict natural phenomenon explanation is that some viewers witnessed seeing nothing out of the ordinary, which to me is remarkable. I mean, if witnesses are at the scene of a car accident, they may describe different things but none would claim there was no car accident, especially if it was a 10-car pile-up.
Well the Miracle of the Sun is an interior vision but also God enables many to see at once at times and some see different things, but with many similarities. God and His angels open the eyes of man to see what he wants them to see. It does not mean that the sun actually moved, yet those there at the time sure felt it was and some thought it was the end of the world. I am certain that it is as with other miracles, as Jesus said let those who have eyes to see, let them see it. When God spoke at the Baptism of Jesus, saying" this is My Son, in whom I am well pleased", some say they heard it and some say they heard something faint. Some rejoiced at the miracles of Jesus, some grumbled and some began to plot to destroy him. I believe in some ways the same was true back then, in Fatima, and now as well.

Also, what about the burning bush Moses saw for example? Was this an actual fire, since it did not consume the bush? Yet Moses saw it clear as day and God spoke to him after drawing attention to the bush. God uses signs to wake sluggish mankind up, get his attention. I recall a number of years ago during a retreat with many friends who have seen the miracle of the sun, as have I both here (especially during the extraordinary Marian year and those times of graces) and abroad, that looking upon the crucifix at sunset, the Lord spoke to one friend and said to her, “even though there are signs, there are no greater signs than that which I have already done for you”.
 
Our Lady said at Fatima that “Wars are a punishment from God for sin.” That " polite little light show in the middle of nowhere" is one factor in an apparition that has spread devotion and prayer to millions since then, so it is not an isolated event even in the least.
You don’t think that’s just a bit silly?

There were 16 million dead in WWI, mainly young men. What sin did they commit that they should die and you don’t?

Or are you saying that God works the numbers, periodically killing off a random proportion of the population as punishment for everyone’s sins, like the Nazis used to execute innocent townsfolk to terrorize the rest?

Go tell that to the families of war dead - that by simply moving the 1917 light show to where everyone could see it God could have stopped war for ever but no dice, their children had to die in mechanized slaughter as punishment for sin, God needs scapegoats, but look on the bright side there’s lots of devotion and prayer going on.

Yikes!
 
God needs scapegoats, but look on the bright side there’s lots of devotion and prayer going on.

Yikes!
Do you believe that God hears and answers prayers? If you do, perhaps all of those prayers prevented even worse atrocities from happening. Just a thought
 
Do you believe that God hears and answers prayers? If you do, perhaps all of those prayers prevented even worse atrocities from happening. Just a thought
Err… you think men in war zones don’t pray to stay alive, and their families don’t pray they should return unharmed? Or are you saying God doesn’t hear them as well, that a prayer in the trenches doesn’t count as much as a prayer from an air-conditioned condominium?

Anyway God already knows none of us want to die in mechanized slaughter, He can read our hearts, He’s not a vending machine.
 
Err… you think men in war zones don’t pray to stay alive, and their families don’t pray they should return unharmed? Or are you saying God doesn’t hear them as well, that a prayer in the trenches doesn’t count as much as a prayer from an air-conditioned condominium?

Anyway God already knows none of us want to die in mechanized slaughter, He can read our hearts, He’s not a vending machine.
When did I say he was a vending machine? So you don’t believe in prayer??? Why do you think God allows for all of this to happen? I’m just trying to understand what you believe.
 
When did I say he was a vending machine? So you don’t believe in prayer??? Why do you think God allows for all of this to happen? I’m just trying to understand what you believe.
You said that “perhaps all of those prayers prevented even worse atrocities from happening.”

If so then we must also allow for the possibility that kids not walking on a crack in the sidewalk prevented even worse atrocities from happening. We must even admit it’s possible that buying a nice new outfit will prevent even worse atrocities from happening. We must even accept the possibility that all of those prayers actually caused worse atrocities than would otherwise have happened.

So I think your argument pans out to no way of knowing whether one prayer may get God’s attention while another won’t and another will back-fire, God is just a random number generator in the sky.

It’s like the “wars are a punishment from God for sin” argument, as if God arbitrarily punishes some for the sins of others. Some fundamentalists said Katrina was God’s punishment on New Orleans, as if God punished everyone in the town whether good or bad.

It seems logically to reduce Almighty God is a tribal god, and prayer to spells.
 
It seems logically to reduce Almighty God is a tribal god, and prayer to spells.
Ok? Do you believe the Words of the New Testament are true? I guess I would like to know if you are Christian or hold a different set of beliefs.
 
Ok? Do you believe the Words of the New Testament are true? I guess I would like to know if you are Christian or hold a different set of beliefs.
I’m Baptist, it’s on my profile on the top left of my posts.
 
By “they” I meant all of them. How was this to work in practice, I don’t know.
I have been asking you for four posts now to clarify your meaning. But apparently it gives you some special thrill to remain obscure.

Fine by me. Good bye.
 
Can anyone adequately debunk the Miracle of the Sun?

Will sit back and listen to both sides. I would like to believe it, but what if it is one of the most elaborate hoaxes in history? I ask this in the philosophy forum because it doesn’t fit anywhere else and I believe there are many scientific minds here who may like to opine.
mass hysteria, bad reporting, impossible to evaluate at this point in time. its a private revelation, so I’m not obligated to believe.
 
I think you’re straining the credibility of evidence there - as I understand it that’s what the girl who claimed Mary spoke to her wrote 24 years later.

There were 37 million casualties of WWI and then another 60 million of WWII. God (or Mary) could have softened hearts, stopped the mechanized slaughter, and established far, far more devotion in the world by placing the miracle over the battlefield at Ypres.

By that one small change of location God could have stopped war for ever and made all of us devoted Catholics. Those who believe in the miracle need to explain why an all-loving God didn’t do that obvious thing, and instead gave every appearance of turning His back by putting on a polite little light show in the middle of nowhere.
I thought my meaning quite clear. I don’t see anything more I could do except to reiterate.

The purpose of the apparitions at Fatima was explicitly stated by the One who appeared, to those who saw her appear. The purpose was stated thusly: “God wishes to establish in the world, devotion to My Immaculate Heart.”

Mission accomplished! But you wish to find fault with God for not stopping a war. There have been countless wars since the Fall of Man, and many, many rapes, pillagings, mass murders, thefts, etc., etc., etc. Many sins committed all over the world, by many, many sinners. Why do you not find fault with God for not stopping all of those?

What about your own sins? Do you find fault with yourself for committing them, or do you complain to God for not sending you an Apparition?

Forgiver me for being blunt: you speak like an atheist.
 
By that one small change of location God could have stopped war for ever and made all of us devoted Catholics.
“If they will not listen Moses and the Prophets, they will not listen even if one should rise from the dead.”

You are not Catholic. QED.
 
He’s not a vending machine.
If you don’t mind inocente, I think this is an important point, which I think I will add in conjunction with my earlier response. God, as you said, is not a vending machine. Therefore, I don’t know why you seem to insist that while He is not at our whims, He should (would?) have stopped the war with a miracle if it had actually happened. Does God owe it to us to stop us from destroying ourselves? If so, then I would say He is more of a vending machine. If He doesn’t owe it to us, along with the fact that there have been many wars throughout history He hasn’t stopped, why would WWI be an exception. This is in conjunction with my earlier response, here:
Yes. It supposedly took place on 13 October 1917, in what was then a sleepy backwater in Portugal.
Meanwhile thousands were dying not far away on the battlefields of the First World War (the first battle of Passchendaele was the day before).
God could have stopped the slaughter by creating the miracle over the battlefield where all the soldiers would have seen it. Instead we’re supposed to believe He callously chose a spot were His pretty little light show had no chance of interrupting the slaughter.
We’re asked to believe God was more interested in making Fátima a tourist spot than helping those in the trenches, which is demeaning both to their memory and to God.
I am very much reminded of the verse that says something along the lines of, “You think not like God, but like men.” I find this very akin to the problem of suffering. You list yourself as Baptist, so obviously that isn’t a convincing enough argument to sway you to atheism. Plus, Mary was trying to communicate a message instead of simply performing a miracle. How will a soldier get all the other soldiers and his commanders to stop fighting to watch a miracle. Probably wouldn’t happen. They’d think he had shell-shock and send him away. Furthermore, the story would have more difficulty getting out since many of the soldiers would end up dying before they could tell the story to someone who hadn’t already heard about it. I don’t think this is a plausible scenario.
 
I thought my meaning quite clear. I don’t see anything more I could do except to reiterate.

The purpose of the apparitions at Fatima was explicitly stated by the One who appeared, to those who saw her appear. The purpose was stated thusly: “God wishes to establish in the world, devotion to My Immaculate Heart.”

Mission accomplished! But you wish to find fault with God for not stopping a war. There have been countless wars since the Fall of Man, and many, many rapes, pillagings, mass murders, thefts, etc., etc., etc. Many sins committed all over the world, by many, many sinners. Why do you not find fault with God for not stopping all of those?

What about your own sins? Do you find fault with yourself for committing them, or do you complain to God for not sending you an Apparition?

Forgiver me for being blunt: you speak like an atheist.
I’ve never met a non-Catholic who believes in it, and I know Catholics who don’t either, so there’s no point trying to lay guilt trips on me.

You can’t use the supposed miracle to validate itself, that’s circular. It’s like claiming an ointment will positively fix all known ills just because the label on the jar says it will.

This is a philosophy forum and I’m making an obvious philosophical argument. God rarely if ever puts on an inexplicable light show whether or not there’s a war going on. Unfortunately wars are far more common than inexplicable light shows. Yet it is being claimed that God, who knows the number of hairs on our heads, who cares for us so much He sent His only Son, chose to locate a light show in a back-water where we can’t even be certain what took place rather than where it could have stopped the slaughter of what was then the biggest war ever, and perhaps ended war for ever. All it needed was to write in the sky, or on the surface of the Moon, War Is Over If You Want It and then everyone would know for certain, so why did He choose not to?

I thought you might give some kind of free-will answer, you know the kind of thing, “God can’t make a 100% believable miracle because then we couldn’t choose not to believe it”. 😃
 
If you don’t mind inocente, I think this is an important point, which I think I will add in conjunction with my earlier response. God, as you said, is not a vending machine. Therefore, I don’t know why you seem to insist that while He is not at our whims, He should (would?) have stopped the war with a miracle if it had actually happened. Does God owe it to us to stop us from destroying ourselves? If so, then I would say He is more of a vending machine. If He doesn’t owe it to us, along with the fact that there have been many wars throughout history He hasn’t stopped, why would WWI be an exception. This is in conjunction with my earlier response, here:
That’s not my argument, please see post #54.
 
It’s all about faith. You can believe or not. You can think up many reasons why others didn’t see it. You can ask why it was Not seen at a more popular area.

For me, I believe it was a message from God for that area of the world. Simple.

He can do anything he likes. I don’t need proof. Others do.
 
I’ve never met a non-Catholic who believes in it, and I know Catholics who don’t either, so there’s no point trying to lay guilt trips on me.

You can’t use the supposed miracle to validate itself, that’s circular. It’s like claiming an ointment will positively fix all known ills just because the label on the jar says it will.

This is a philosophy forum and I’m making an obvious philosophical argument. God rarely if ever puts on an inexplicable light show whether or not there’s a war going on. Unfortunately wars are far more common than inexplicable light shows. Yet it is being claimed that God, who knows the number of hairs on our heads, who cares for us so much He sent His only Son, chose to locate a light show in a back-water where we can’t even be certain what took place rather than where it could have stopped the slaughter of what was then the biggest war ever, and perhaps ended war for ever. All it needed was to write in the sky, or on the surface of the Moon, War Is Over If You Want It and then everyone would know for certain, so why did He choose not to?

I thought you might give some kind of free-will answer, you know the kind of thing, “God can’t make a 100% believable miracle because then we couldn’t choose not to believe it”. 😃
You keep referring to it as a light show, with the seeming implication that it was a miracle for miracles’ sake. While I definitely find it to be a decent tool for conversion, as I stated in my original post on the first page, there was a message to be given out which I don’t think would have been nearly as effective for the reasons I stated earlier.
 
Yet it is being claimed that God, who knows the number of hairs on our heads, who cares for us so much He sent His only Son, chose to locate a light show in a back-water where we can’t even be certain what took place rather than where it could have stopped the slaughter of what was then the biggest war ever, and perhaps ended war for ever. 😃
Why do you think it would end the war? I am sure that people would say it was just the effects of war… Shell shocked troops, or shells exploding in the air. If God so chose to have this miracle appear on the battlefield I am quite sure you would be here today making the argument that God should have done “his light show” at some other place at some other time, not in the confusion of War.

Why do you think that this would end War forever?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top