B
Beryllos
Guest
Ho hum.
Here’s my question… Are you actually reading what people are posting? Nobody here is advocating chain smoking. Some of us enjoy an occasional pipe and cigar. BIG DEAL.You don’t have to read this post you choose to.
Look, I’m glad that you gave up cigarettes. But your personal problem isn’t everyone else’s problem. You can’t project your addiction on others. The Church says moderation. If you have an issue with moderation, yes, you should quit smoking.Because I didn’t like being a smoker – that’s why I decided to become a non-smoker
Wh… what?The World Health Organization gives this fact: “[Tobacco is the] Leading cause of death, illness and impoverishment.”
I’ve rarely seen a sillier example of correlation mistaken for causation. This quote on no level offers evidence that tobacco is the “leading cause” of impoverishment in these low- and middle-income countries. The most the article demonstrates is that people who are already poor, are more likely to smoke for enjoyment (which is consistent with other evidence that people who are already poor, are more likely to choose unhealthier comfort foods. People living in poverty seek small pleasures where they can get them. It’s not the small pleasures that ‘lead’ them into poverty, by and large; the small pleasures are chosen because they’re already in poverty and they figure they might as well enjoy this one small thing). If a person is already so impoverished that the household spending on tobacco displaces other basic needs like food and shelter, then that person is already so impoverished – for non-tobacco-related reasons – that simply ceasing to smoke tobacco will not lift them out of poverty.Over 80% of the 1.3 billion tobacco users worldwide live in low- and middle-income countries, where the burden of tobacco-related illness and death is heaviest. Tobacco use contributes to poverty by diverting household spending from basic needs such as food and shelter to tobacco.
Lol!!! I agree with Father. I had a cigarette a week ago or so. Might have a cigar tomorrow, we’ll see!After just a few cigarettes? No.Addiction to nicotine can happen quickly.
Some things, it seems, do not change on this forum.Having the occasional pipe or cigar does not make one an addict. There are varying degrees of these things. Some people, due to genetics, body chemistry, environment, and many other factors, might smoke one cigarette and be instantly hooked. But some not. I could smoke a pipe every night for a week, and then put it down for months on end. I know myself and I know my limits.
If you can’t smoke without being addicted, then you shouldn’t. If others can’t smoke without being addicted, then they shouldn’t either. But we must not go to the extreme of insisting that every instance exposes one to the risk of addiction and physical dependency, and for that reason should be always and everywhere avoided.
And with that, I will decline to further participate in this thread, given that my reasoning doesn’t seem to be seriously considered.
He’s not, unfortunately. It is an attempt at the “perverted faculty” argument, when best argued, as I mentioned above… But we have to understand what the faculty of breathing actually is in order to analyze the argument. Two counter examples… anesthesia, and straws. Neither is illicit, we assume… so… we go from there. The “harm argument” can only go so far without being contrary to the clear principle of the body existing for the body-soul composite (the whole person)…You’re probably the first person here to link smoking with masturbation and sexual sins.