Ummmmm… A lot of the religious Catholics I know are far from feminine… Same with religious black men. Honestly, it’s my secular friends that seem to do the most gender bending activities.
@ bold: true statement. But I never stated nor implied all Catholic male laity or priests are effeminate. What I basically said is that I’ve seen more than a few effeminate males in Mass. One of the priests that did my great aunts funeral Mass was very effeminate. And the tall, handsome, young black male that appears to take all the photos at my mothers predominately black Catholic church for Sunday Mass is very obviously effeminate. None of this makes either bad people. For all I know is they’re
great people. And something ought be said positive (in my opinion) for a religion that tolerates effeminate males, especially during its sacred hours of worship.
I also will say that something positive could be said for the Catholic Church not just throwing the most despised people in Western society - pedophiles of any sexual orientation - simply to the wolves.
But this comes with an image price. Same thing with a celibate priesthood. But I think I ought say I have doubts that the first half of the 20th Century had as many effeminate Catholic priests as their have been in the last several decades I’ve seen.
And in Black-America - which I know very well - not many black men go to Sunday Protestant services. No where near compared to the numbers of women. In fact in some of these small store-front churches I swear I see about 99% of the people coming out of them being women and 99% of the males are their little boys they make come along.
Add to that that the Nation of Islam has for a long time charged that Islam is more masculine than Christianity. In fact, I think most Black-American males that convert either to the neo-Islam of the NOI or to orthodox Islam tend to agree that Islam is more masculine because it does not teach “womanish” things like let a person slap you around, take your things, or even enslave you. What it says is that not only should you have a woman but you can have two or three if you can afford them, and if someone comes to take your coat from you (rob you), don’t give it to them, punch their teeth down their throat. Like a U.S. Army Ranger or made Italian in the La Cosa Nostra (mafia).
I do have question because I don’t know the answer: when Muslim men go to mosque to kneel and worship are they side beside Muslim women during the same worship services or is it an all male bonding affair?
I partly ask because I see photos all the time of young Muslim men in the East standing in packs with one another - even outside mosques. And I might be wrong but within those La Cosa Nostra or Army Ranger like teamed up groups of men all the decisions seem to be discussed and decided. If kick butt and burn down stores is the decision that’s what goes down. Not a woman’s advice is sought - from the impressions I get (but those impressions may be wrong).
My thoughts exactly…Mohomand had a 14 year old girl convince him that he was a chosen profit when he had a “dream” that Gabriel the angel came to him a told him God chose him to set right “wrongs”. Historically, (according to the Bible) God went directly to his prophets, he did not send angels.
I don’t think a man with many lovers, and kills people who deny his blinded religion, is manly. Its sounds like the dumb jock on a football team. He may seem appealing at first but no one wants to be married to a Venereal diseased infected dumb jock.
Lots of women prefer a promiscuous male regarded as a “stud” - especially one that might have wealth from robbing caravans (banks, or heisting trucks like Sicilian/Italian mobsters) - to a man that would reflect characteristics of Jesus: Age 30 or over and unemployed, has sex with no woman, no girlfriend, walks around preaching morals with no job, lives off others (monetarily), and lives with his mother.
If Jesus were here on earth living like that today almost all Republican males would call him a loser and few to no women in the Democratic Party would find him attractive. In fact they would regard him as a loser too.
Add to that Jesus hung around the rejected - and many that would be called losers or worthless too.
Mohammad looked like Reagen, Obama, and the New Yorker John Gotti.
I do think the Catholic priesthood should start thinking about prohibiting (not getting rid of current priests like this) future men from the priesthood that are outwardly effeminate in mannerisms.
And it would do well to be less shamed by the historical Crusaders, the IRA, or football player, or street fighters than by gay oriented priests that seek to seduce and fondle little boys.
Other than that I think it ought retain some if not most it’s radical views on “masculinity.” Namely, to turn the other cheek or avoid fights even if it might mean giving up your coat. But like the Asian martial Artist say… there comes a point. And at some point it’s time to stand ground and fight. No more turning the cheek. No more giving up coats.