C
christofirst
Guest
Seen it I have. Good it was.
Concur. Disney probably could give or take people seeing the films it sponsors, provided they herd en masse to its parks in California and Florida.I’m not a fan of Disney, but id rather boycott and petition ABC for televising the O Neal’s. I haven’t watched many Disney monies the last few years because of their PC correctness in their movies and also their “redoing” fairy tales" so it conforms to feminist ideas. If you boycott anything it should be Disneyland, where it will hurt. This park has a Pride Day, and has had this for a few years, yet it was built as a “family” park. However, Star Wars will be a huge movie both here and abroad. And I do plan to see it although I may wait until the DVD comes out. I still love the original 3 movies, not do much the prequels.
The names of everybody I heard they changed? Still there is Yoda?Seen it I have. Good it was.
No Yoda in this one, but a Mrs. Magoo type of similar character with age and wisdom.The names of everybody I heard they changed? Still there is Yoda?
Actually he was, for just an instant, in the… Ummm… Flashback. Obi Wan too.No Yoda in this one, but a Mrs. Magoo type of similar character with age and wisdom.
Well I’ve never been a Star Wars fan and yet I watched it.never have been a star wars fan so don’t plan on seeing it.
And both have the characters watching the planet be destroyed from another planet a few light years away even though they technically shouldn’t be able to see it for a few years because light doesn’t travel that fast.While I’m not as harsh as you on Abrams’ Star Trek movies – I enjoyed them – I have to agree with a lot of Trek fans that, at least to some extent, he really doesn’t “get” Trek. By his own words he is a lifelong Star Wars fan so TFA was a dream project for him.
In fact, I don’t think it’s an exaggeration to say that his Trek movies have some Star Wars in them. (Complete with planet-destroying superweapon in the first one.)