So Much For Trump's Latest Proposal

  • Thread starter Thread starter ChuckB
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Much of the existing barrier along the southern border hardly qualifies as a fence or wall. In fact, many stretches consist of nothing more than a “vehicle barrier” that fails to slow down foot traffic.4 The remainder of the fence is a mixture of easily climbed, poorly installed corrugated panels and other ad hoc materials. Only short stretches is a heavy-duty barrier installed in a concrete footing or double-layered fencing separated by a patrol road.
 
This is not Trump’s wall. Exactly why we need an updated wall.
Unless Mexico bans ladder and shovel technology, I do not see where an updated wall will help. But it was my understanding the wall was going to be built where there are no walls, not replace existing walls.
 
But it was my understanding the wall was going to be built where there are no walls, not replace existing walls.
What led you to believe this? Can you cite a source?
 
Last edited:
Walls have a useful purpose.


Walls absolutely do work. They work for multiple different reasons, but not for the reasons people often think. Interestingly, there is not a single mile of wall where I served, though nearly every Border Patrol agent wanted one in certain areas. However, right on the border itself is a community college that was having a major problem with illegal aliens and drug traffickers coming over the river and then cutting through their campus. They almost completely stopped it by erecting an eight foot high fence around the campus.

Currently, we are catching about 30% percent of all aliens illegally entering the country. Even if a wall were to result in a modest improvement to just 40 percent, that is an additional 1 million more people who will stopped over a 10 year period.

Here is what people misunderstand about walls. They are not 100 percent perfect barriers where if you simply put them up no one can get through them. Instead, they work because: 1.) They add just a couple extra minutes to an illegal alien’s entry into the country. Although this does not sound like much, this means that Border Patrol has a couple more minutes to arrive in time to stop the person. The problem we often have is that Border Patrol responds to motion detectors, but because of the vast distances they cannot get there in time, so the aliens are gone by the time they get there. 2.) If, rather than scale a wall, aliens go around it, this decreases the total amount of border which must be patrolled, thus allowing Border Patrol to more effectively deploy its limited man-power in what are essentially “choke points” between walls.

Additionally, a border barrier can severely affect the powerful Mexican drug cartels in ways most people aren’t aware of, forcing them to spend time and resources on entering the country rather than abusing people. A wall drives up the operating costs of the cartels, decreasing their power. They must purchase more equipment to get around or through it, and pay more for personnel. For example, a foot guide who now demands $1,500 to take a group of 15 people might now demand $3,000. Even a modest increase in the chances of getting caught forces the cartels to pay significantly more to get people to work for them (essentially, hazard pay). By driving up their costs, fewer people will be able to afford to hire cartels to illegally enter the United States, thus making human trafficking itself less profitable.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, you may prefer the “popular vote” to be the method, but it has been determined that it would not be the best method. Elections can be disappointing to those who did not vote for the winner. Most people decide to accept the result with respect. Only a flagrant exposure of wrong doing that is proven by law can change the result. A personal opinion of what a majority is doesn’t count.
 
It’s DOA.

Ann Coulter is going to forbid it.
It’s DOA because House and Senate Democrats won’t even consider any proposal that includes funding for a border wall, not because of Coulter, et. al.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top