H
Hesychios
Guest
The early church mandated that* NO KNEELING* be done on Sundays during liturgy. This was mandated in Ecumenical Councils which the Roman Church signed onto, and was binding in the west as well as the east.… apart from latin bias I think that a firm argument can be made that there is an objectively superior nature to kneeling as a form of reverence regardless of the tradition of one rite to the next.
In the east a profound bow at the waist requires us to bend the knees in order to touch the floor with the back of our hands, and this we do (those of us who are able). Resting the weight on one or both knees we do not.
I don’t have a problem with kneeling personally, in the east we may kneel six days a week, and usually on the hard floor. But the fact is the letter the priest wrote was historically correct, and the Latin church’s later introduction of kneeling comes from the recently converted Goths, who had previously been Arian Christians (or in some cases still pagans) and this is a cultural borrowing from them. Until that time Roman Catholics had no problem standing to pray or receive communion on Sundays.
Why is everyone so mad? Probably because they are used to kneeling on solemn occasions just like their ancestors. The idea that kneeling is a superior form of reverence is culturally informed, which is why the Roman church had such a hard time controling it in the sixth and seventh centuries.
This is just one of the many small departures from the Faith and practice of the early church that one will find in Roman Catholicism if one cares to look.
Church history can be interesting.