I don’t know about you, but my wife and I tend to discuss important decisions. Having an abortion would be one of those important decisions. If either of us made a decision without consulting the other in this matter then I would class that as being a dereliction of our relationship.Freddy:
Would the moral wrong in that act be more akin to stealing a lock of hair, or more like killing a child? Recall - the mum was delighted to be pregnant.
Agreed. But what “act” was the killing of the 1-week old offspring Most like Fred? I offered a couple of options.
Most people do not class a blastocyst as such. If you prefer to, then that is your choice. And yes, abortions are legal.Freddy:
Sorry, Fred, there is a need. We’ve been trying to extract from you a rational argument that permits killing the child. Your latest attempt was to label the child as “nothing more than the cells, the tissue … of human origin”. Of course, all human tissue is of human origin. The important point that you did not make is what human being generates the human tissue in question.
And the last point that you left out, why?
An argumentum ad populum fallacy. Please provide a rational argument.
I did the cooking tonight. My wife said she didn’t want garlic in the bolognaise. Hey, what does she know! My bolognaise is excellent. So I put some in without her knowing. She thought it was delicious. Of course it was.Freddy:
Would that be because you think it’s murder, but won’t admit it, because it would imply that a woman who doesn’t want her baby is also committing murder?
If not feel free to state what law you think is appropriate.
If it’s immoral purely because he is imposing something on her against her will slipping a vegetarian meat is equally immoral. Is that what you believe?
So was murdering the Jews in Nazi Germany. The question is not of legality but morality, i.e., “May we?”.
Good question! Let me think about whether abortions are immoral or not and get back to you.Freddy:
The question is not of legality but a morality, i.e., “May we?”.
Sorry, Fred but you still only had a “feeling”. A reasoned argument from you is still lacking. Get back to us when you get one.
As per earlier post: I asked
Do you honestly think that because I am pro choice then I think that having an abortion is just a walk in the park? Then it’s akin to deciding what to have for dinner? Seriously?Freddy:
As per earlier post: I asked
“ Would the moral wrong in that act be more akin to stealing a lock of hair, or more like killing a child? Recall - the mum was delighted to be pregnant.“
(The act being the father slipping the mother a pill to kill their offspring).
Is your favorite sport Dodgeball?
For a chemical abortion what’s the difference?
Between what?Freddy:
For a chemical abortion what’s the difference?
Having an abortion and taking a vitiman pill.
