J
Jeanne_S
Guest
Because God can neither decieve nor be deceived.He certainly might have said that. But how do you know it’s true?
Because God can neither decieve nor be deceived.He certainly might have said that. But how do you know it’s true?
As are your assertions…just assertions…so how do you prove your assertions?I don’t know that I have any indelible mark - I see no evidence of such. Again, it’s just an assertion.
Do you see the trees and the water that He created? Or just simple accidents of nature.I don’t know that I have any indelible mark - I see no evidence of such. Again, it’s just an assertion.
Let me ask you this, since you are a former Catholic. What makes you believe that God didn’t reveal Truth. Like from a Catholic perspective (or former Catholic to be exact)You can’t prove a negative. The burden of proof rests with those making the positive assertion - that God did reveal the Truth through Catholicism.
What assertion am I making? I said I don’t know,As are your assertions…just assertions…so how do you prove your assertions?
Do you even believe that Christ came to this earth my friend?He certainly might have said that. But how do you know it’s true?
Geesh, for how much you “don’t know” i’d say your in a simple state of Confusion and that your so called reasoning is sprouting from this giant confusion. Reason and Logic have to have a base. Not a confused base, but a solid, firm foundation.What assertion am I making? I said I don’t know,
I believe that an eternal, omnipresent God set in motion the processes that resulted in nature as we know it.Do you see the trees and the water that He created? Or just simple accidents of nature.
Do you believe in the Trinity?I believe that an eternal, omnipresent God set in motion the processes that resulted in nature as we know it.
No, I do not.Do you even believe that Christ came to this earth my friend?
No, I think it’s a concept created by man - and I really don’t think it’s that important. God is beyond numbers.Do you believe in the Trinity?
Well now we’re getting somewhere!No, I do not.
Virtually all scholars of antiquity agree that Jesus existed and regard events such as his baptism and his crucifixion as historical.
Guess you just answered my question re the Trinity…No, I do not.
What do you mean by “base of reason”?Geesh, for how much you “don’t know” i’d say your in a simple state of Confusion and that your so called reasoning is sprouting from this giant confusion. Reason and Logic have to have a base. Not a confused base, but a solid, firm foundation.
Your reason for any of this cannot be used due to the fact that you do not have even a bases of reason.
Because I don’t find the evidence that Christ was/is God to be convincing.Well now we’re getting somewhere!
WE have found it!
Thanks for your honesty my friend. But may i ask why?
Just wondering,when did you come to this conclusion? Ar you a young adult,or older?How long has it been that you rejected the gift of your Catholic faith?No, I think it’s a concept created by man - and I really don’t think it’s that important. God is beyond numbers.
This is your assertion…"I see no evidence of "…why do you believe this assertion of yours?What assertion am I making? I said I don’t know,
Well, in a religiously philosophical stand point, it means what your general belief or morality is. And i’m sorry for accusing you of being confused because i did find your base of reason.What do you mean by “base of reason”?
Well…if there is anything wrong with Catholicsm…then the gates of hell has prevailed…and now you are not sure if what you got from us is in error or not…I certainly don’t hope that Catholicism is wrong. My salvation depends on it being substantially correct.