I
Image_of_God
Guest
What is meant when it is said that the Roman Liturgy is supposed to have a somber, solemn character?
Thanks for anything.
Thanks for anything.
Who said that? and have you confused sobriety with solemnity? Sobriety means they’re not drunk. It’s the least we can ask, no?What is meant when it is said that the Roman Liturgy is supposed to have a somber, solemn character?
Thanks for anything.![]()
I believe it is sobriety and solemnity. Has not sobriety have more than one meaning?Who said that? and have you confused sobriety with solemnity? Sobriety means they’re not drunk. It’s the least we can ask, no?
What do you think it means?What is meant when it is said that the Roman Liturgy is supposed to have a somber, solemn character?
Thanks for anything.![]()
Wouldn’t clapping be okay even though its solemn?What do you think it means?
Solemn-- reverent, holy, serious
The Mass is solemn because we enter in to the Pascal Mystery.
No. Clapping is not part of the rubrics.Wouldn’t clapping be okay even though its solemn?
During the songs and hymns.No. Clapping is not part of the rubrics.
Where would you clap in the Mass?
If you’re talking historically- it is because the Roman liturgy was inherited the legal character of the ancient Romans, Everything was siple, straightforward and dingified. It was low of the cultus of saints, short and to the point in word and ceremonial, etc. If you draw the comparison to one of the liturgies of the East you’ll see the difference. They tend to be wordier, have more ceremonial, frequently mention the Mother of God and the saints, etc. When the Roman liturgy was fused with the Gallician ones- it did take on some of their characteristics including wordier prayers and more ceremonial. But it still remained a bit on the “sober” scaleWhat is meant when it is said that the Roman Liturgy is supposed to have a somber, solemn character?
Thanks for anything.![]()
I guess that answers everything.If you’re talking historically- it is because the Roman liturgy was inherited the legal character of the ancient Romans, Everything was siple, straightforward and dingified. It was low of the cultus of saints, short and to the point in word and ceremonial, etc. If you draw the comparison to one of the liturgies of the East you’ll see the difference. They tend to be wordier, have more ceremonial, frequently mention the Mother of God and the saints, etc. When the Roman liturgy was fused with the Gallician ones- it did take on some of their characteristics including wordier prayers and more ceremonial. But it still remained a bit on the “sober” scale