Socialized healthcare

  • Thread starter Thread starter COPLAND_3
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
maybe we dont feel so horrible about defecits if they are spent on medical care as oppesed to on a war. republican conservatives, upon taking over presidncty ans bothe hoses of congress. budget defecit (((( natuional debt 5,5 trilion. bush glides gently thoward the end of an admisistration which just set the recore for the one most judged incapable since theve been taking the polls (he ha a lower approval rating right now than NIXON had. to do thst you have to have it as a set goal and really work at if for 8 years. it is possible he may slide to less than 10 percnent,) anyway bushs defecti He says about 500 billion, actually more than that but well et it pass, national debtover 9 for as long as we did. lllion dollars. boy its a good thing we had a conservative tight pursed congree and presidencyfor as long as we did. does anyone know what color alert we are on for security prrpose. is there anyone whio can even name the colors there were for the 4 states of alert. budget dfecit at the end of clintons term. actually we paid of part of the nation debt. defecit plus about 155 million.love conservatives.
 
you havent answered the question.
Write your question in a word processing program, run the spelling and grammar checker, and perhaps it will be intelligible enough to understand.
you immediately gop back to our lousey educational system as if this wer them imspired word of God. truth is we hve for 70 percent of our chiolde=ren a great eductinal system.
There are two things I get from this – the first is it’s okay to throw away 30% of our children.

The other is that you hold that those who do graduate actually get a good eduction. That is, of course, not true. In all tests, American school children come in close to dead last among industrialized nations.

The idea that a system that totally fails 30% of the children can somehow give the remaining 70% a first-class education is simply ludicrous
if u-you wish ill elaborate but to get back to the question. what about the condition i outlined in my email… of we havent figured out how to get and pay for enough janitord to clean th schools what are we even talking about affording doctorates.
First of all, you haven’t demonstrated that we don’t have enough people to clean the schools.

Secondly, there is plenty of money in schools – but it is mismanaged and syphoned off:
dcedublog.blogspot.com/2008/04/real-cost-per-student-twice-as-high-as.html
Tuesday, April 08, 2008
Real cost per student twice as high as reported?
Is the cost per student in DC really twice as high as previously reported? The Cato Institute seems to think so. After crunching the numbers it comes out with a per student grand total of [drum roll please]… $24,600.
If you have 25 children in a classroom, that classroom is getting $615,000. For that kind of money, you can afford to keep the electricity on, pay PHD and a janitor – and you ought to have a quarter of a million or more left over!!

Where’s the money going? It’s not going to the classroom!
i guarantee you pay them what a doctor earns and they will have doctorate. teached, economically, qatre subject to the same lwas as any other person. please ask Dr Tellerif he wourl consider wouking in a university teaching advance physices if he had to perform janitorial services every once in awhil. you want him for a teacher, or anybody else doctorate or no pay them what they are worth, or even better pay then for what youm want them to be worth and then insist that they live up it that standars. th above wipes oout part of your ideas about the schools having enough, or even too much mioney.
Right. Given that in DC, they already pay enough for your doctor. And they still have a lousy school system.
thats the rough equivilent of insisting that the world isd growing enough foodand we should stop expanding agriculture when 1000s are dying of starvation.
Another fallacy. We could double food production and there would still be starvation – because corrupt, brutal governments and tribal leaders use starvation as a weapon.
 
I agree, the repubs spent too much money, and convservatives are not pleased about it. They were not good stewards of taxpayer money, spending was amuck, if you didn’t spend a dime on the war. The defecit can be blamed on both parties. But when you place against the total economy of the U.S. it is manageable. The size of govt has grown every year since Bush took office. Not a a good thing.

Now add social medicine and see what it does to the numbers. It is tbe primary reason both states are broke.

An excerpt from a brilliant column by Thomas Sowell about recent politics.

"*he says about domestic policy is straight out of the 1960s and virtually everything he says about foreign policy is straight out of the 1930s.

Protecting criminals, attacking business, increasing government spending, promoting a sense of envy and grievance, raising taxes on people who are productive and subsidizing those who are not – all this is a re-run of the 1960s.

We paid a terrible price for such 1960s notions in the years that followed, in the form of soaring crime rates, double-digit inflation and double-digit unemployment. During the 1960s, ghettoes across the countries were ravaged by riots from which many have not fully recovered to this day.

The violence and destruction were concentrated not where there was the greatest poverty or injustice but where there were the most liberal politicians, promoting grievances and hamstringing the police.*"
 
i think i finally get it. youve been toying with me all this time. son of a gun. i think your stsatement about strarving people finalyy woke me up to this fact, because it went just a taad too far towards complete immorality. that started me thinking and the rat kind of fell (name removed by moderator)lace. i really have to compliment you, up until now i relally believed i wwould be smart enough to catch a kidder, but you got me. well, nice to n=know that afterv all o that tine of thinking one thing about you, that it wasnt true and that you really are sane. . try it again some time on an unrelated subject and see if i can catch it quicker. thanks again. it wa fun.
 
Alfred E. Neuman sez-
think i finally get it. youve been toying with me all this time. son of a gun. i think your stsatement about strarving people finalyy woke me up to this fact, because it went just a taad too far towards complete immorality. that started me thinking and the rat kind of fell (name removed by moderator)lace. i really have to compliment you, up until now i relally believed i wwould be smart enough to catch a kidder, but you got me. well, nice to n=know that afterv all o that tine of thinking one thing about you, that it wasnt true and that you really are sane. . try it again some time on an unrelated subject and see if i can catch it quicker. thanks again. it wa fun.
???
 
I think he’s making a link between Napoleon’s expedition to Egypt and the shadowy Committee for Foreign Affairs.😛
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top