Sola Scriptura is Absolutely biblical

  • Thread starter Thread starter BibleOnly
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
IMy redeemed spirit is instantaneously and immediately made perfect, at that point, because of the finished work of Christ on the Cross.

.
Christ’s work on the Cross means nothing unless a person ACCEPTS it with all one’s heart and soul … and body… St. Luke 10:17 says to give up everything to follow Christ… Have you done that?

The Bible is clear that we must be holy in order to enter Heaven…(“Be perfect as your father in Heaven is perfect”)…

Heaven… where no impure thing will enter (Rev 21:27)
 
The Bible does not teach. People teach. Jesus left us the Magisterium for this very reason. He did not leave us a book.

Matt. 5:25,18:34; Luke 12:58-59
Indication of a temporary state in which there is a purification from sin. Purgatory leaves us perfect and ready for a relationship with God for eternity.

Matt. 5:48
We cannot be perfect on our own. Only God’s everlasting burning love can bring us to perfection

Matt. 12:32
Forgiveness before heaven, but after death.

2 Tim. 1:16-18
Onesiphorus is dead already, but Paul seeks mercy for him. There is no need for mercy in heaven, and none given in hell.

Heb. 12:14
We still sin as believers, but we must be perfectly holy to be before God.

1 Peter 3:19; 4:6
Righteous souls being purified for the beatific vision.

Rev. 21:27
Nothing unclean enters heaven. Propensity to sin is uncleanliness

Gen. 50:10
Prayer for the dead.

2 Macc. 12:43-45
Prayer for the dead.

Heb. 12:29
An example of God’s consuming fire

1 Peter 1:6-7
Referance to fire to test the fruits of our faith.

Zech. 13:8-9
Purification by fire for those that are saved.

Mal. 3:2-3
Purification of the righteous dead.
But the Bible’s own testimony is that the words of God, divinely inspired, instruct us in righteousness making us fit for every good work.
 
Q3 If I die now my redeemed spirit is separated from my body and goes to be with the Lord. All my earthly toils, struggles and labours are then over. My redeemed spirit is instantaneously and immediately made perfect, at that point, because of the finished work of Christ on the Cross.
Very good. The Catholic Church put a name to what you described - Purgatory. What you said is 100% Catholic!
 
But the Bible’s own testimony
The Bible can’t testify. That is an action(verb). People testify.
is that the words of God, divinely inspired, instruct us in righteousness making us fit for every good work.
So you believe the Bible is the inspired, inerrant word of God because the Bible says so? If I tell you this post I’m writing right now is the inspired, inerrant word of God would you believe it? It says that it is so therefore it must be, right?
 
Lampo;4301691]
Originally Posted by Craig Kennedy
But the Bible’s own testimony
Lampo
The Bible can’t testify. That is an action(verb). People testify.
If this is true then how do you understand or take the Bible when it says that you must believe in Christ to be saved?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig Kennedy
is that the words of God, divinely inspired, instruct us in righteousness making us fit for every good work.

Lampo
So you believe the Bible is the inspired, inerrant word of God because the Bible says so? If I tell you this post I’m writing right now is the inspired, inerrant word of God would you believe it?
If you claimed to speak in the name of the Lord then we would need to investigate this claim before we could believe that what you write is inspired-inerrant. Would you be willing to claim this?
It says that it is so therefore it must be, right?
🤷
 
If this is true then how do you understand or take the Bible when it says that you must believe in Christ to be saved?
The Bible is a book. It cannot “speak”. You read words, and you discern meanings. It is not a mystical process. That is unless you have a “talking Bible” such as on tape or CD, but then it is the narrator “speaking to you”. But its still not a “mystical process”.
If you claimed to speak in the name of the Lord then we would need to investigate this claim before we could believe that what you write is inspired-inerrant. Would you be willing to claim this?
This would be something many of you seem to freely claim to do. Oh, not in so many words, but in many words…especially when you attempt to tell us Catholics what the Bible “says”. Sometimes I wonder if you hear “voices”…😉
Yeah… 🤷
 
Where did Jesus or His apostles ever teach such a thing? Chapter and verse please.
Try looking, no better still, stop “worshiping” your bible and try reading Augustine’s writings… you’ll find the answers there.

If you don’t understand the subject, ask a realistic question and one of us will actually give you an answer.
 
RobHom;4301802]The Bible is a book. It cannot “speak”. You read words, and you discern meanings. It is not a mystical process. That is unless you have a “talking Bible” such as on tape or CD, but then it is the narrator “speaking to you”. But its still not a “mystical process”.
This would be something many of you seem to freely claim to do. Oh, not in so many words, but in many words…especially when you attempt to tell us Catholics what the Bible “says”. Sometimes I wonder if you hear “voices”…😉
What these kinds of responses is that you and others have problems with discerning figures of speech.
Do you think that Christ stil speaks through the Scriptures to the church today?
 
RobHom;4301815]Try looking, no better still, stop “worshiping” your bible and try reading Augustine’s writings… you’ll find the answers there
.
If a person is going to use some source i would think that they could articulate it and support it.
If you don’t understand the subject, ask a realistic question and one of us will actually give you an answer.
 
If this is true then how do you understand or take the Bible when it says that you must believe in Christ to be saved?
Me understanding what the Bible says is not the same as the Bible testifying.
If you claimed to speak in the name of the Lord then we would need to investigate this claim before we could believe that what you write is inspired-inerrant. Would you be willing to claim this?
No, I said that in order to get a point across. I guess I failed. The Koran says it is the inspired word of God. Have you investigated this claim? If so, what was your conclusion? On who’s/what authority did you base this conclusion? If it is your own authority, could you be wrong in your conclusion? Why or why not?
 
Lampo;4301910]
Originally Posted by justasking4
If you claimed to speak in the name of the Lord then we would need to investigate this claim before we could believe that what you write is inspired-inerrant. Would you be willing to claim this?
Lampo
No, I said that in order to get a point across. I guess I failed. The Koran says it is the inspired word of God. Have you investigated this claim? If so, what was your conclusion? On who’s/what authority did you base this conclusion? If it is your own authority, could you be wrong in your conclusion? Why or why not?
Good questions. i have read up on these kinds of things and there are a number of ways to approach this. One is we could test the Koran for its accuracy on geography. This is a simple test. Secondly and most importantly we could compare it with a source that you and i would agree is inspired-inerrant i.e. the Scriptures. If the Koran contradicts the Scriptures it would be false on that account. I know Musilims won’t accept this outright. They believe the Bible has been corrupted but when you ask them for the eivdence for this claim they have none.
Thirdly, we could do a comparison with Jesus and Muhammad and see the major differences.
This does not mean they would accept all of this that easily. I have listened to a number of debates between Musiliums and Christians and i don’t think the case for the Koran is that strong.
 
What these kinds of responses is that you and others have problems with discerning figures of speech.
I have absolutely no problem understanding or discerning figures of speech, nor do I have any problem understanding the bulk of English colloquialisms.

Why is that you have so much trouble understanding the responses that are given to you? Don’t lay blame at my feet when you wear the shoes…that apparently fit well.
Do you think that Christ stil speaks through the Scriptures to the church today?
What do you think?
 
.
If a person is going to use some source i would think that they could articulate it and support it.
Google it… its obvious that your fingers are not broken, besides, you want the answer, I told you where to find it…go look.🙂
 
Good questions. i have read up on these kinds of things and there are a number of ways to approach this. One is we could test the Koran for its accuracy on geography. This is a simple test. Secondly and most importantly we could compare it with a source that you and i would agree is inspired-inerrant i.e. the Scriptures. If the Koran contradicts the Scriptures it would be false on that account. I know Musilims won’t accept this outright. They believe the Bible has been corrupted but when you ask them for the eivdence for this claim they have none.
Thirdly, we could do a comparison with Jesus and Muhammad and see the major differences.
This does not mean they would accept all of this that easily. I have listened to a number of debates between Musiliums and Christians and i don’t think the case for the Koran is that strong.
Have you done this?
 
Try looking, no better still, stop “worshiping” your bible and try reading Augustine’s writings… you’ll find the answers there.

If you don’t understand the subject, ask a realistic question and one of us will actually give you an answer.
Wasn’t it Augustine who was so adamant about limbo which is no longer a church doctrine?
This is from usatoday.com/news/religion/2007-04-20-popelimbo_N.htm
“If there’s no limbo and we’re not going to revert to St. Augustine’s teaching that unbaptized infants go to hell, we’re left with only one option, namely, that everyone is born in the state of grace,” said the Rev. Richard McBrien, professor of theology at the University of Notre Dame.
“Baptism does not exist to wipe away the “stain” of original sin, but to initiate one into the Church,” he said in an e-mailed response.

Here is a professor of theology saying we are born into grace and not original sin. How do you explain this? For generations people had anxiety and guilt about not having infants baptized. They lived in fear of their child becoming ill and possibly dying in the state of original sin and now it’s no big deal. This is proof that there is great value in relying on scripture.
 
Wasn’t it Augustine who was so adamant about limbo which is no longer a church doctrine?
This is from usatoday.com/news/religion/2007-04-20-popelimbo_N.htm
“If there’s no limbo and we’re not going to revert to St. Augustine’s teaching that unbaptized infants go to hell, we’re left with only one option, namely, that everyone is born in the state of grace,” said the Rev. Richard McBrien, professor of theology at the University of Notre Dame.
“Baptism does not exist to wipe away the “stain” of original sin, but to initiate one into the Church,” he said in an e-mailed response.
In other words the Reverend McBrien said nothing literally definitive as it is not his place to make public statements as to Church dogma.

I think it best to leave it to the Holy See to resolve it, however I think this sums it up quite well:

*1265 Baptism not only purifies from all sins, but also makes the neophyte “a new creature,” an adopted son of God, who has become a "partaker of the divine nature,"69 member of Christ and co-heir with him,70 and a temple of the Holy Spirit.71 *
Here is a professor of theology saying we are born into grace and not original sin. How do you explain this? For generations people had anxiety and guilt about not having infants baptized. They lived in fear of their child becoming ill and possibly dying in the state of original sin and now it’s no big deal. This is proof that there is great value in relying on scripture.
One must be very careful when reading “secular” articles that “quote” people… I think that often times much of what is said mysteriously vanishes into thin air, and only what the writer wants to appear does. The article makes it seem that the Professor of Theology is going against Church teachings, and somehow I doubt that a Theology Professor at Notre Dame has much inclination to lie about Church teachings…there is more to the issue than one “soundbite” or a “quip”.🙂
 
Craig Kennedy;4298553:
What scripture does affirm is this:

At death, a person’s final spiritual state is settled. For those numbered among the sheep (the godly) their spirits are at peace with Christ in an “intermediate” state. This intermediate state is not purgatory but, simply, the soul in its naked state awaiting the resurrection of the body. They then go to heaven in its fullness.

=onenow, This is your opinion Craig, and that is fine. However the topic is : Sola Scriptura is Absolutely biblical: And as you can see many individuals do not agree, so what happens to sola when this occurs ?

Here is the actual biblical opinion the way I see it below.

3:12-15:
“Now if any one builds on the foundation with gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, straw— each man’s work will become manifest; for the Day will disclose it, because it will be revealed with fire, and the fire will test what sort of work each one has done. If the work which any man has built on the foundation survives, he will receive a reward. If any man’s work is burned up, he will suffer loss, though he himself will be saved, but only as through fire*.”

You see craig we can’t both be right and; as a matter of fact,there is a wide range of opinions on many topics in scripture, in the end our opinions are not relevant. Jesus left us with a hierarchy. This is what devout catholics believe. May the Holy Spirt lead us both as we discern truth.

Peace,onenow1:coffee:

We shall steer safely through every storm, as long as our heart is right, our intention fervent, our courage steadfast, and our trust fixed in God. St. Francis De Sales
I appreciate the spirit in which you write onenow1.

Yes, the topic is sola scriptura is absolutely biblical - and I am taking the affirmative position! It is absolutely biblical because the scriptures claim themselves to reveal God’s unerring will and mind. Furthermore, these scriptures stand over the opinions, traditions and reasoning powers of humans.

I do not disregard tradition or reason. Many good traditions and human theories do not conflict with the scriptures; some may accord or resonate with them; still others are judged by the scriptures and found wanting.

The idea of Purgatory, in my view, is a classic example of my explanation. Sola scriptura means that the scriptures alone stand supreme in determining dogma; therefore, it is my considered belief that the scriptures do not afford a place to the notion of Purgatory.

I agree with you that our opinions are not relevant. Our minds and hearts have to bow to the declarations and propositions of scripture.

Therefore, sola scriptura is absolutely biblical and its practical import is that it is the divine plumbline in deciding what is the truth on an issue.
 
If most people go to purgatory before heaven why didn’t Jesus and the apostles tell everyone about this when they were explaining the plan of salvation?
Jesus and the apostles did not tell anyone about Purgatory because it was not a part of the apostolic message or plan of salvation.

The apostolic preaching was a direct command to REPENT AND FLEE FROM THE WRATH TO COME! There is a heaven to gain and a hell to shun. It is that simple.

The New Testament rings and reverberates with the urgency to call upon the name of the Lord before it is too late.

The ethos and spirituality of the New Testament know nothing about Purgatory and afford it no place in the divine scheme of things. Yes, sola scriptura is absolutely biblical!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top