S
SemperReformada
Guest
It doesn’t really bother me either.For me, the number of denominations doesn’t actually matter!
It doesn’t really bother me either.For me, the number of denominations doesn’t actually matter!
Even on the Catholic side of things, a non-christian will say there are thousands of christian groups (including the Catholic church). How can christianity be true if there are loads of denominations?It doesn’t really bother me either.
FROM THE WORLD CHRISTIAN ENCYOPCLIA SPILLING WRONG AND SORRY ABOUT THE CAPPSThe user doesn’t claim to have one.
Give us proof there are 33,000 denomoninations.
There are NO denominations of the Catholic Church. And I don’t have to be smart to know that. Either the church is Catholic or it is not. Catholic Churches regardless of where they are on this planet are required to believe in the same doctrine and practice the same belief. It’s amazing how the one billion Catholics would be praying and particiating and hearing the same Biblical passages during the mass at anytime of the day and week anytime of the year all round. That’s because the Catholic Church is one. The mass or rather the Communion is an expression of this oneness with God and with each other.Someone smarter than me can correct me if I’m wrong…but I would confidently claim there are NO denominations of the Catholic Church. None whatsoever.
God Bless
That’s because the acorn doesn’t resemble the oak tree, SIA. But the oak tree contains nothing that did not first originate in some less visible way from the acorn.
That’s why The Church calls Rome its geographical home although it wasn’t yet explicitly in Rome at the time Scripture was written.
That’s why The Bible makes no reference to the word “Trinity”, yet you fully accept that word as describing a biblical truth which is a critical belief you must maintain for your Christianity
That’s why you have a Bible in your home, when hardly anyone in the first 1000 years of Christianity did.
Christianity evolves and adapts as necessary to the changes and needs of an evolving society and world, but never loses it’s foundational composition.
Furthermore, there is NO difference between Catholic and catholic.BALONEY… None. This is such a frustrating argument, to say "Hey, I’m little “c” not big “C”. Rubbish.Why the distinction then? You’re **not either **if you’re not united to the Church. Catholic and catholic mean exactly the same thing. The only thing that confuses you to think they’re different is the fact that Christ’s True (catholic) Church adopted the adjective catholic, to pronounce Her title to the world, Catholic. They mean the same thing. Part of the reason was to distinguish Herself from obvious heresy. I think I:blush: see the real heresy here
And I apologize to tell you, but you are not catholic. The Anglican church is not “on the whole”. They do not believe what every pre-reformation Christian has always believed at all times in every place. Neither do Eastern Orthodox Christians. Are you going to tell then that they are not catholic either?
You want to be catholic? Unite yourself with the C(c)atholic Church.
God Bless
Brian,If it were as easy as that…
It isn’t.
There are lots of churches with apostolic succession and in the two books he may have wrote, he does not give me any insight. If it were such a slam dunk, there would not be all these churches with apostolic succession.
I just read Eusebius tonight and that church looks as Oriental Orthodox or Eastern Orthodox as it does Catholic. Doctrinally who does it look more like? That is stickler for me.![]()
SIA,
First…a request: If you are going to quote my posts, and then respond by typing within the quote, distinguish your comments from mine more clearly, perhaps using a different colored font, and separating yours from mine. Thank you.
Secondly, to respond to your comments:
You asked, why the distinction between “little c” and “big C”? And I answered that within that same post. The Church, which is truly catholic, further identified itself to the world as catholic by using this adjective in it’s formal name, “The Catholic Church”. No other denomination is either, because Catholic embodies the exact same description and definition as catholic, when regarding Christianity.
Your problem is that you buy into the false rhetoric that has brewed and spread over the past 500 years, which tries to make the distinction between the litte “c” and big “C”, when in reality there isn’t a distinction, and never has been one.You never answered my previous question regarding this so I am just going to ignore anything that you have to say regarding this.
Eastern Orthodox DO maintain the same, fundamental unified beliefs as The Catholic Church, specifically those which align with the Deposit of Faith, and are essential for salvation. This is why The Catholic Church proclaims Orthdox Churches to be “in communion” with Her. And in that regard, they are indeed catholic. That’s funny. They will not make that same statement about you.
Anglican?..no sir. This is your opinion only.
God Bless
Tell that to the Eastern Orthodox church.No denomination other than Catholic can trace their roots in an unbroken succession all the way back to Peter and the apostles. A succession that has been manifested by the laying on of hands. Every other Christian denomination can ultimately trace their roots back to some individual and time when they separated from the Church built on Peter and the faith which that Church teaches.
that believing in the assumption of Mary as an example is necessary for my salvation. .Bill your reasoning is so out of line on this. Bible alone doesn’t lead to contradictory beliefs. Improper interpretation of scripture is what leads to contradictory beliefs. Scripture alone simply means that on matters of faith, nothing including tradition cannot contradict nor override what scripture states. In other words you can’t tell me that believing in the assumption of Mary as an example is necessary for my salvation. Traditionally you may believe that event took place but scripture does not introduce that as a necessity for salvation. Otherwise what constitutes salvation would always be a moving target.
The Assumption of Mary is a revealed truth. It is to be held as true. To deny or even doubt it would then be heresy. Also, (and maybe more simply and positively put) to get to Heaven, you must have faith – even Protestants would agree with this. But, what is faith?that believing in the assumption of Mary as an example is necessary for my salvation. .
I DONT THINK ANY CATHLOIC BELIEVE THAT THEY MUST BELIEVE IN THE ASSUMPTION TO GET TO HEAVEN