S
slMike
Guest
**Solid evidence reveals large March for Life turnout vs. NY Times’ “hundreds” and Post’s “thousands” **
*Steve Jalsevac *
WASHINGTON, D.C., January 23, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) – Contrary to the New York Times, there were vastly more than “hundreds” at the Washington March for Life 2016 and more than the vague "thousands" indicated by the Washington Post. Given this year’s historic winter weather threat, organizers were delighted that at least 40 or more thousands of pro-life supporters still stayed to march the full length of the march route before rushing home.
Mainstream media, however, took advantage of the adverse circumstances to manufacture the lowest numbers yet of their usual far-too-low estimates of participants in the annual march this year…
Thank God for alternative media. Great pics at source.
*Steve Jalsevac *
WASHINGTON, D.C., January 23, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) – Contrary to the New York Times, there were vastly more than “hundreds” at the Washington March for Life 2016 and more than the vague "thousands" indicated by the Washington Post. Given this year’s historic winter weather threat, organizers were delighted that at least 40 or more thousands of pro-life supporters still stayed to march the full length of the march route before rushing home.
Mainstream media, however, took advantage of the adverse circumstances to manufacture the lowest numbers yet of their usual far-too-low estimates of participants in the annual march this year…
Thank God for alternative media. Great pics at source.