Some bishops want a do-over

  • Thread starter Thread starter McCall1981
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

McCall1981

Guest
cruxnow.com/church/2014/10/14/some-bishops-want-a-do-over/

Some bishops want a do-over

By John L. Allen Jr. and Inés San Martín
Crux Staff October 14, 2014

ROME — Surprising words of appreciation for homosexuals, couples living together outside marriage and others that appeared yesterday in a working document from a summit of Catholic bishops in Rome have triggered a media tumult on the outside, and sharp debate on the inside.

While the Vatican tried to play down the significance of the document, insisting that it’s merely provisional, some bishops inside the Oct. 5-19 Synod of Bishops on the family seem to be taking it very seriously indeed.

During yesterday’s discussion, one bishop asked why the word “sin” seemed to be nowhere in the text, for instance, while another warned that it could encourage “conforming to the mentality of today’s world.”

The Vatican today released a summary of the discussion that followed release of the document, though without identifying speakers by name.

The midterm report, presented by Hungarian Cardinal Peter Erdo, was intended as a summary of the synod’s conversation to date, and has no standing as a statement of church teaching. It likely will be significantly modified before a final version is adopted by the bishops on Friday.

One cardinal taking part in the synod told reporters today that some media coverage distorted a proper understanding of the document, falsely suggesting that it contained firm conclusions of the whole body.

“We’re now working from a position that’s virtually irredeemable,” said Cardinal Wilfrid Fox Napier of South Africa.

“The message has gone out that this is what synod is saying, that this is what the Catholic Church is saying,” he said. “Whatever we say hereafter will seem like we’re doing damage control.”

(Read the rest there)
 
I have a feeling this is following the same arc as Paul VI’s papacy. People are expecting the Church the change, but there will be a Humanae Vitae-like statement that will leave them sorely disappointed.

It also reminds me of Vatican II’s expounding on EENS and religious liberty. There is no “right to be wrong”, but there is a “right to not be killed or ostracized for being wrong”.

It’s comforting to know that this was just banter. The Truth always wins out in the end.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top