Some insurgent Republicans see weaker fundraising

  • Thread starter Thread starter oldcelt
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, then because of Obamacare, the elderly have lost $500 billion
This is actually a good thing, because the elderly are takers, not makers. So they have nothing to complain about because they don’t deserve subsidized health insurance. What right do they have to demand that working people sacrifice for them? They have no right to that and it is about time that they face up to that reality.
 
Obamacare subsidies and administration will be paid 100% by borrowing. I recently read that if artificially low interest rates we have now returned to a normal rate, the interest on the debt alone will be $500 billion per year. And yet, this administration is entirely resistant to considering modification of their desire to borrow.
OTOH, drive interest rates up and there’s less incentive to borrow and more incentive to reduce the debt. At least theoretically.
 
So now the game calling includes using the term insurgents. Nice. :rolleyes:
Apparently, that’s all the left can do is name calling. I think it says more about them than the Republicans. And in my mind it reaffirms that the choice I made in 2004 to leave the Democrat party was the right move. When the mainstream media becomes nothing more than a propaganda arm of the government there is no more system of checks and balances and no way for America to be free.
 
Are you running for office? 🙂
No. I’m just your average blue-collar Catholic who used to be a registered Democrat but am now a registered Republican. When I switched parties it was because I realized that while the Catholic Church was saying that abortion is intrinsically evil, the Democrat party was calling it intrinsically good. The same for euthanasia, cloning, and fetal stem cells. And now add so-called “same-sex marriage” to it all. It’s like a snow ball that keeps getting bigger and keeps gathering more speed. When the Church says that something is intrinsically evil it is the same as it coming directly from Jesus himself. And we know who is the main one opposed to Jesus. If we are not with Jesus we are against him.
 
No. I’m just your average blue-collar Catholic who used to be a registered Democrat but am now a registered Republican.
I have no idea how that works. After Nixon I was determined to learn all about the Libertarian Party and voted accordingly but I can’t say I switched parties or was a registered anything.
 
I have no idea how that works. After Nixon I was determined to learn all about the Libertarian Party and voted accordingly but I can’t say I switched parties or was a registered anything.
Being registered means that you are registered to vote in the primaries. And this registration is considered a basic membership in that party.
 
If that continues it virtually assures a bloody GOP primary in 2016 (He is not well liked by a great many in his own party). That will leave them divided…result…pretty obvious.

Just conjecture on my part.
John he is well-liked in Texas. I don’t think anybody expect shim to have any problems getting reelected or facing any serious primary challenge in spite of the withering attacks that will be directed at him by the Austin American-Statesman and the Houston Chronicle.

For instance last week the Houston Chronicle had an editorial titled “Why we miss Kay Bailey Hutchinson”.Of course they hated her when she was in office but now arer singing her praises as compared to Cruz. As with most of the mainstream media the Chronicle only pulls for Republicans when they’re out of office or vote like Democrats.
 
Mark Levin is calling for a boycott for the businesses associated with the chamber of commerce. Sounds like civil war to me. But, it’s one of the only wars I might be in favor of.
So, I take it that you regard the Constitution as irrelevant. Nothing the “progressives” ever do in its name disturbs you. You are comfortable with the $17T debt, and nearly $100T in unfunded liabilities. Oooo…Kkkkk… It’s blissful, I’m sure. :confused: Rob
 
If it’s so well known that everyone knows about it, it shouldn’t be a problem. Defend your entire argument that you previously posted. Thank you.
Ah. So you can’t defend your assertion that the alleged “shutdown” did or will cause interest rates to rise. I thought not.

I have defended my argument with sources to the extent I wished to do so at this juncture. You have done nothing to defend yours. Judgment for Ridgerunner.
 
This is actually a good thing, because the elderly are takers, not makers. So they have nothing to complain about because they don’t deserve subsidized health insurance. What right do they have to demand that working people sacrifice for them? They have no right to that and it is about time that they face up to that reality.
I realize you and I agree to a point, but disagree as well.

I support Medicare as a welfare program that’s socially responsible in concept, but feel it should be means tested.

I join you in saying there is no justification to require working people to pay the medical bills of those who can afford to pay them.
 
I realize you and I agree to a point, but disagree as well.

I support Medicare as a welfare program that’s socially responsible in concept, but feel it should be means tested.

I join you in saying there is no justification to require working people to pay the medical bills of those who can afford to pay them.
Agreed.
 
Unfortunately I think the Republican Party is really going to suffer because of its role in the government shutdown. I think, perhaps, that Tea Party Republicans will especially suffer due to it. I really think Republicans will likely lose the 2014 elections and maybe even the 2016 elections.

I hope that the Republicans do not lose the upcoming elections. I do not agree with everything that the Republican Party stands for but I do agree more with them than I do with the Democrats by far. We need conservatives to be in charge and let’s face it, the Democrats are leftists while the Republicans are generally more conservative.
The TEA PARTY cannot be so blind and arrogant as to think they can rough up the establishment of the GOP, Dems and Independents and not suffer consequences.

Case in point: When I get e-mails from the TEA PARTY trying to run a Ted Cruz for Senate in Massachusetts soliciting me for money in order to “win”, I see that more or less as an insult to my intelligence.

That’s like #occupy getting Nancy Pelosi to run for Senate in Oklahoma and sending out e-mails to New York and Vermont saying she can win.

It’s absurd.

And let me tell you what went down in Nodak and WI last election was absolutely unacceptable, and I hope the voters there realize there’s not much that Walker and the gang can do if the feds ruin the dollar.

The TEA PARTY is not going to out-feel the left. They need to be smart about it, and in a lot of cases, they aren’t.

You can’t possibly run people like Linda McMahon in a blue state or have someone like Sharron Angle go against the Senate Majority Leader, who is well liked in Nevada and had a nice war chest.

But the TEA PARTY brings diversity and energy to a GOP that has gotten so “square and boring” as El Rushbo would say, that they can’t see past their own suits and panic whenever the establishment media criticizes them.

However, that being said, the GOP will keep the House and likely win the Senate in 2014.
A lot of the democrat seats up are in red states where Romney won by double digits even with high democrat turn-out.

The media will, of course, mostly “squirrel and spin” this, but it’s not looking good for Harry Reid keeping his spot.

As far as 2016 goes, look at like this:

It took the democrats winning the following to drag Obama across the finish line:

3:1 Latinos

3:1 Asians

Single women by 33 points.

93% of Blacks (BTW, 20% of Black men 18-29 went to Romney)

If you ask me, there’s a **lot more pressure on the democrats **because they need such **high percentages of these groups. **

And if they want to run Hilary, I suppose that’s fine.** Her numbers have quietly fallen** to the point where whispers about Warren and Klobuchar should enter the primary, and I doubt minority voters will give her the same free passes.

I’ve also noticed that some of the polls undersample republicans by as much as 10-11 points.

What should concern the left is that their Vice President has at one time or another, trailed Rubio, Christie, Ryan and Paul.

A vice president should be practically a shoe-in, especially if magical demographics are on his or her side.

And if anyone tells you the left is without division, ask how union coal miners feel about the “war on coal” or ObamaCare. Ask the 35 environmental organizations why they are suing Obama appointee Lisa Jackson of the EPA for not enforcing existing regulations on the energy industry.
 
This is actually a good thing, because the elderly are takers, not makers. So they have nothing to complain about because they don’t deserve subsidized health insurance. What right do they have to demand that working people sacrifice for them? They have no right to that and it is about time that they face up to that reality.
The elderly are the richest group of people in this country.
 
So now the game calling includes using the term insurgents. Nice. :rolleyes:
I thought that term applied to the terrorists in Iraq who were killing American soldiers so the mainstream American media can be politically correct.
 
The elderly are the richest group of people in this country.
But many are not.

In any event, many have “wealth” only because their homes are paid off now. And for those who go into long term care, oftentimes their homes are lost to their heirs because the state will file a lien for care on their homes. That’s one of the phenomena that supports the burgeoning market for “reverse mortgages”. Those who take them are, in effect, liquidating their homes.

Having brought up those exceptions, I agree with your point.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top