Something Bad That Jesus Did?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ben_Masada
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ben, I have to shake my head at some of your posts. It seems like you came here just to stir up trouble. You are acting like you want to destroy Christianity. Just like Paul did. But God showed him what he was doing wrong, so, instead of remaining Saul, his name was change to Paul.

There are many ways to destroy a church. Focus on the believers, and have at it. That’s the work of Satan. Who’s side are you on?
 
Do you think James, the chairman in Jerusalem was happy to have lost most of his synagogues in Asia Minor to Paul? Besides, he had a good to membory to remember what Paul had done 14 years before when he caused that havoc in Jerusalem as to endanger even the Nazarene’s reputation among the local Jews. It was for having saved Paul’s life that day from the Jews who wanted to kill him that the Lawyer Tertullus in Court befor Felix, connected Paul as a ringleader of the Sect of the Nazarenes. (Acts 24:5) The faster James could get him out of Jerusalem the best. So, he drew some kind of recommendations for the former Nazarenes disciples and got Paul out of their sight.That’s some pretty good conjecture. It’s purely conjecture, but rather good.
They were never lifted, at least, not by Jerusalem.
Paul lifted them himself, as he abolished them on the basis that they were commandments of man.

Ben: 🙂
I’ll have to look. I’m almost positive they were lifted elsewhere, because if I remember correctly, Paul seemed rather agitated that they were lifted. I’ll what if I can find it later on today.
 
Ben, I have to shake my head at some of your posts. It seems like you came here just to stir up trouble. You are acting like you want to destroy Christianity. Just like Paul did. But God showed him what he was doing wrong, so, instead of remaining Saul, his name was change to Paul.

There are many ways to destroy a church. Focus on the believers, and have at it. That’s the work of Satan. Who’s side are you on?
Christy, I don’t think Ben is here wishing to do the work of Satan, so that last question is rather inflammatory.

With Ben here, this gives us a chance to read the New Testament much deeper in the hopes of disproving Ben’s wild accusations. They are rather original and very in-depth points he brings up, causing me to reach deeper into Scripture to (attempt to) point out his flaws.

You know what the Church teaches… “God lets bad things happen so that a greater good can come out of it”! (No offense, Ben!)
 
May God Put in us His Understanding

To NotWorthy. Maybe if you get back to the threads 187 and 189 you can remember. I am sorry, I was not giving judgment on you all. I was just trying to remember you Who’s The Boss, which is not me.

To Ben Masada. Look what you wrote and think with me. (The time was not then, neither then, nor then. The People had to bleed first with a catastrophic Holocaust in order to be reduced to a remnant, according to Isaiah 37:31,32. )

Isaiah never said what you are saying. But I am not about to prove it now. You are a guy intelligent, so use your intelligence for achieve the wiseness.

You made a mistake. The same mistake that our fellow Hebrew did, our fellow Jew did, our fellow Catholics are doing.

Undermind, you are saying that, the Holocaust were necessary and God played a roll on it. In your undermind you are saying that, Adolph Hitler and the Nazi Party were tools at the Hands of God. It seems like, on your undermind you are forgiven the bad guys because of the Holocaust.

Look, it is not a bad thing. I would compare you to the centurion who Jesus said never had seen such faith, nor even in the midst of Jews. You are been more Christian than our fellow Catholics because, to us, forgive Hitler should be easier because were not our close relatives that were killed.

But the problem is that, When you say that the bad guys were tools in the Hands of God, for do the bad things, you are also underminding it, God is just like them.

If you hate Hitler because what he did, you also hate God because, in your conception, God was behind him. So, if you love Hitler, have the possibility of you also love God, even not knowing Him as you think you do.

Anyways, you need to love Hitler because he is the worse enemy that the Jews ever had until now. What he did is terrible. But I can’t judg him because, to me, who does what he did must have some kind of dementia and the people that followed him was blinded. What I never can do is love what he did. It I hated and always will hate.

But you are in debt with God because you believe that God was behind the Holocaust. If so, the Nazy Party would be justifiable. And its members are just wait for some excuse like that for to claim their place in Heaven. But it is not true.

Even we forgiving their sins, which is exceptionally good to us, is necessary to remove the consequences of their sins before they can be cleansed. Now they are in our hands and in The Hands of God. We need to forgive them for our own good. And they need God for To Remove the consequences of their sins that are impossible to us to help them do.

I am sorry if I can’t be more clear, if necessary, but History is driven by mankind, not God. Whatsoever He had To Do, He already Did in the Beginning. He gave us freedom for to manage ourselves History. And He Will Be at The End fo To Cleanse Up ours mistakes and wrongdoings that we are unable of remove the consequences. But we to start it now.

May God Help us to remove all accusations against Him in our underminds.
 
May God Put in us His Understanding

To NotWorthy. Maybe if you get back to the threads 187 and 189 you can remember. I am sorry, I was not giving judgment on you all. I was just trying to remember you Who’s The Boss, which is not me.
It’s just that in my quote on #185:
When did Jesus call her a dog. Was he just using an analogy?
It seems that in truth our good Lord was testing her Faith (all the while knowing the results… He is God, of course!) and letting her display this faith to His Disciples.
 
To the only Scriptures that Jesus used know and handle.

Ben: 🙂
How then can you learn that Jesus was even an historical person if not by the New Testament? Is there some other source that
you learned that He was ever even born? It is an honor and a
privelege to ask questions to one of God’s chosen race, thank
you for this.

But I honestly want to share my true feeling that saying Jesus
did something bad is the same as saying that God did something bad. I have a true concern and even anxiety that this is
“blasphemy of the Holy Spirit” the only unforgivable sin. I know
that God is willing to forgive us for our lack of understanding,
but I do not lack understanding on this point. In order to save
my own self from complicity in this, I am honor bound to state
with clarity that Jesus is not capable of doing anything bad.

May you learn all the truth and share it with us all…

:blessyou:
 
How then can you learn that Jesus was even an historical person if not by the New Testament? Is there some other source that
you learned that He was ever even born? It is an honor and a
privelege to ask questions to one of God’s chosen race, thank
you for this.
Yes, you are right; I have even been criticised by other Jews who know of my interest in claiming Jesus as one of our own. The Talmud mentions Jesus, albeit in a very negative manner. And Origen mentions Jesus a lot, around 220 CE. To me, it doesn’t matter how bad Jesus is talked about, it only tells me that historically, he was real. He was an Orthodox observant Jew, and this for itself makes anything not Jewish about him untrue.
But I honestly want to share my true feeling that saying Jesus did something bad is the same as saying that God did something bad.
That for example, can’t be true. It’s not Jewish for a Jew to be God. Therefore, it’s not true.
I know that God is willing to forgive us for our lack of understanding, but I do not lack understanding on this point. In order to save my own self from complicity in this, I am honor bound to state with clarity that Jesus is not capable of doing anything bad.

Tell me, do you think Jesus was a charismatic man? I bet you do. And so do I. Very charismatic. When he finished his Sermon of the Mount, the crowds of Jews whom he was delivering that sermon to, were spellbound at his teachings.(Mat. 7:28) This means he was indeed a charismatic man.
All right. Now, I have a question to you: Why didn’t he use his charisma instead of the whip to lash at the money changers, who were making a living by facilitating the change of money to foreigners? Mind you that he caused financial damage to those people who did not react because they thought he had lost his mind. Couldn’t he impress them with his charisma to make them vacate the area?
What happened to the Golden Rule of not doing unto others what we would not like they did unto us? Do you still hold that he was incapable of doing anything bad? Never mind how he felt, but he could have used some self-control and persuade the money changers in some other way.
:blessyou:
 
Ben, I have to shake my head at some of your posts. It seems like you came here just to stir up trouble. You are acting like you want to destroy Christianity. Just like Paul did. But God showed him what he was doing wrong, so, instead of remaining Saul, his name was change to Paul.

There are many ways to destroy a church. Focus on the believers, and have at it. That’s the work of Satan. Who’s side are you on?
No Christy Beth, I am here to claim Jesus as one of our own. Jesus was an Othodox observant Jew, and never had anything to do with the Church of Paul. Therefore, anything not Jewish about Jesus was not true.

Ben: 🙂
 
It is following the golden rule if you want someone to do anything
in their power to keep you from offending God.

Whatever Jesus has done, He has done for a reason. I often
wonder what happened the next day. Did those people who
were shooed out of the temple say to themselves, “Wow, I
guess I won’t go back there any more. Jesus was right, I have
no right to turn the temple into a den of thieves”.? I bet they
didn’t think that way at all. They probably went right back to
doing the same thing, and Jesus never threw another fit. So
what was it all for? Asking is one thing, saying Jesus did
something bad is another. …blessings on you…
 
That for example can’t be true. It’s not Jewish for a Jew to be God. Therefore, it’s not true.
What is more important, and what seems to escape you is that it’s not human for a man to be God either. 😉

Do you think this is beyond the power of God?

Nevermind whether YOU THINK God is acting like a bad Jew.

You have God all straight-jacketed within your narrow understanding of Judaism. The Second Temple Jews were guilty of the same. 😉
 
What is more important, and what seems to escape you is that it’s not human for a man to be God either. 😉

Do you think this is beyond the power of God?

Nevermind whether YOU THINK God is acting like a bad Jew.

You have God all straight-jacketed within your narrow understanding of Judaism. The Second Temple Jews were guilty of the same. 😉
Well said. 👍
 
To Ben Masada,

I came across something that reminded me of your “theory” that “The Way” and “The Christian Church” were two different sects.

I got this from AgapeBibleStudy.com
Code:
In the Bible there are many different names given to the One True God.  The most frequently used names or titles for God are YHWH, usually rendered as Yahweh (ca. 6,800 times); Elohim (ca. 2,600 times); Adonai (ca. 439 times); and El (ca. 238 times).  Most of the other names are combinations of these names like Yahweh Elohim, El Shaddai, and El Eloah.  The most commonly used names for God in Hebrew and Protestant Bibles are Ha-Shem, meaning “the name,” which is used in the modern Jewish Masoretic Text (a text that dates to not earlier than c. 1000 AD) translations of the Jewish Tanach (Old Testament), and Jehovah (used in both Protestant and Jewish translations).  Both are names for God that are not found in the Hebrew text of Sacred Scripture and only date back to copies or translations of Scripture from the Middle Ages.
So, Ben. According to your logic, the Church of the Nazarenes (of the Apostles), or “The Way”, is different from the Christian Church (of Paul). Then by your own logic the Hebrews were polytheistic. Is this the case?
  • YHWH (or Yahweh)
  • Elohim
  • Adonai
  • El Shaddai
  • El Eloah
 
To Ben Masada,

I came across something that reminded me of your “theory” that “The Way” and “The Christian Church” were two different sects.

I got this from AgapeBibleStudy.com

So, Ben. According to your logic, the Church of the Nazarenes (of the Apostles), or “The Way”, is different from the Christian Church (of Paul). Then by your own logic the Hebrews were polytheistic. Is this the case?
  • YHWH (or Yahweh)
  • Elohim
  • Adonai
  • El Shaddai
No, NotWorthy, of course not! You know much better that we are the first ancient People to be born already Monotheistic. It was a Hebrew custom to use a variety of names to attribute to God according to how they would perceive the Divine emanations.

YHWH for example, as the One Who cannot be defined. That’s the Tentagramatum. HaShem, the Name used to prevent any attempt to define the Tentagramatum. Elohim when they became consious that HaShem was not a local God. Adonai, our Lord. And El Shaddai, the One Who satisfies. Thus, all names of how the Jew perceives the only One and incorporeal God.

Ben: 🙂
 
No, NotWorthy, of course not! You know much better that we are the first ancient People to be born already Monotheistic. It was a Hebrew custom to use a variety of names to attribute to God according to how they would perceive the Divine emanations.

YHWH for example, as the One Who cannot be defined. That’s the Tentagramatum. HaShem, the Name used to prevent any attempt to define the Tentagramatum. Elohim when they became consious that HaShem was not a local God. Adonai, our Lord. And El Shaddai, the One Who satisfies. Thus, all names of how the Jew perceives the only One and incorporeal God.

Ben: 🙂
Yes, of course I know that. The Hebrews were the first to receive the knowledge of our One God.

My goal in asking the ridiculous, is to point out that even though the early Church was called:
a) The Way
b) Christian
c) Catholic
doesn’t mean that it was more than one Church.
Thus, all names of how the early Christians perceived the only Church and Her followers.

God bless you, brother, and again, I’m not intending to offend.
 
No, NotWorthy, of course not! You know much better that we are the first ancient People to be born already Monotheistic.
I’m sorry Ben, that I must seem always to be nit-picking with you, but I always prefer more precision in language, as it indicates more precision in thinking.

The Jews were never “born already Monotheistic” as you say, but rather they had Faith in God’s Revelation to his chosen prophets and people in this one aspect of his nature. That he is ONE, and without any others, was never arrived at by man alone without this Revelation. The Jews, and all of God’s people must always thank Him for His Revelations, when they are made known to us, and given our full Faith. 😉
 
Posted by Ben Masada,

No, NotWorthy, of course not! You know much better that we are the first ancient People to be born already Monotheistic. It was a Hebrew custom to use a variety of names to attribute to God according to how they would perceive the Divine emanations.

May God Send us some of His Wisdom

Ben, your are right on many of your statements but some have spots of prejudice. On your defense of your point of view you see the Counsel of Nicea as a manace to the integrity of the writings from the first Christians. I am not so sure about it because we don’t have a manuscript of the Scriptures earlier than the Counsel, so we only can speculate about it. I don’t like to work with supposition unless it is vital. Until we have a concrete piece of evidence for to prove that, the Scripture were changed at that time, we must stay on what we have. Have contradictions? Yes. It does. Then show the contradictions based on facts.

It is wise to do like this because you know, at the time of Josiah the Torah were rewritten. And you can not say that they just translated what was written before. After that, the Priest edited the Torah, problably in Babylon. He got it right? May we never know because we have not a prior writing at hands.

But have something that we now know that you should account on it. You know the Psalms, the Proverbs etc. Until some time ago they were attributed to the Biblical wisdom. But have some place in Egypt, called by the name of Amarna, where some of those piece of wisdom were founded written in stones.

I don’t know if you know but Amarna were the chosen capital for Akenothan’s religion. He is the father of king Tut. And he were the first to create a cult worshipping one god, which were represented by the Sundisc. How you deny though that, Hebrew faith came from the Gentile beliefs?

Hebrews evolved from Gentiles. Jews came from Hebrews. The Jewish faith generated the new Jews and Christians. Christians evolved to Christians of the Middle Ages. In the starting of the Modern Ages, Christians divided into two branches, later three, four and so on. The Catholics of today are different of the Catholics that were before. The same to Jews. And it will be true in the next generation.

What it mean? Simple. Before Moses, David, or Solomon were born, the Gentile already got something from God. Why should though anyone attribute what were written before to others? God did not learn from men. Men learn from God

If you take 2 Chronicles 24: 27, you will read there, “Now concerning his sons, and the greatness of the burdens laid upon him, and the repairing of the house of God, behold, they are written in the story of the book of the kings. And Amaziah his son reigned in his stead.” Not only these statement but some others about the kings. It clear mention to you that, the source of the history in the Bible were the Annals of the Kings and the books that come from it are just a human interpretation. Just an attempt of theologize what was human writings. It is a mere Manual of Conduct, not the Word of God.

It is why I can say to you. God’s Teachings are everywhere to anyone to hear It. The problem is that, once It is in the mind of mankind, mankind uses as himself ego say to use. You are right. We need to filter what is in the NT. But the same must be true for the OT too.

About my saying that Isaiah never told nothing about the Israel that is in the Map today. The Truth is that, Despite of God Knows everything that will be, He Does Not Reveal It to anyone. Why not?

God is not only Omniscient. He is Omnipotent. It mean that, What He Say Will Be, nothing can prevent It To Be True. God Is Always Truth. If He Say that, Tomorrow one of us will die, it is a sentence not a mere wishful thinking. If He said and it be not happen, then He would fail on Be Truthful. God does not say something and change His Mind later. He is Omniscient. He does not say anything moved by emotions. He Does Say Based On His Knowledge.

Based on what I state above, If God had said that, a New Israel will be born, as you interpret in the Bible, then, Not matter what anyone have done for it to be true it would be a Sentece from God. It mean that, Hitler and the Nazy Party, all of the others peoples, ours parents before us, we and our descendants have not even a partial will. Everything we do, would come from the Will of God. So, if we are bad, would be God’s Will. If we are good, would be also God’s Will, not ours.

God does not conduct our History. He Know what we will do but He does not reveal it to anyone. It is why Jesus did not know when somethings would be happen. He had a mere idea, based on his knowledge of the past. We also have the same knowlege.

You learn the contrary by just copying what was the Babylonians, the Egyptians, the Persians beliefs. They was always thinking in the future and not observing the Will of God. You my friends still, in part, been Gentiles.

Now, the Gentiles are saying that, the world will radically change in 1212. Where they learn it? Through the Mayans, Michael de Notre Dame and many other Prophets of Doom. Prophecy is not a divination of future. Prophecy is to prepare the people for to do The Will of God.

From now on, do Prophecy. Try not to do magic.

May God Give us Great Prophecy.
 
40.png
Valmabar:
God does not conduct our History. He Know what we will do but He does not reveal it to anyone. It is why Jesus did not know when somethings would be happen. He had a mere idea, based on his knowledge of the past. We also have the same knowlege.
I like most of your post Valmabar, but what is above, I must disagree with somewhat.

God does not conduct our History, as you say, but he DOES interact WITHIN our history. Because God leaves us Revelations in the Bible (which he very definitely does do,) that does not mean that mankind does not have a free will do to whatever he wills.

It ONLY means that God FORSEES, as only GOD can do, what men will do with his free will at some later time. It does not force men to do HIS will. INDEED, the very men who are responsible for fulfilling prophecies, are sometimes working (in their own minds) against God.

This is a very difficult concept to grasp sometimes. Even Catholics sometimes say Judas was fulfilling a prophecy by betraying the Christ Jesus. They think that somehow removes his guilt, but it doesn’t. It makes no difference. Judas was not thinking of the Prophecy when he betrayed Jesus, he was thinking his own wicked thoughts. It is only IN HINDSIGHT that the evangelists notice that Judas fulfilled a prophecy. See?

Jesus did show many times that he foresaw the future, not based on what happened in the past. Look at Matthew 17: 24-27 🙂
 
I like most of your post Valmabar, but what is above, I must disagree with somewhat.

God does not conduct our History, as you say, but he DOES interact WITHIN our history. Because God leaves us Revelations in the Bible (which he very definitely does do,) that does not mean that mankind does not have a free will do to whatever he wills.

It ONLY means that God FORSEES, as only GOD can do, what men will do with his free will at some later time. It does not force men to do HIS will. INDEED, the very men who are responsible for fulfilling prophecies, are sometimes working (in their own minds) against God.

This is a very difficult concept to grasp sometimes. Even Catholics sometimes say Judas was fulfilling a prophecy by betraying the Christ Jesus. They think that somehow removes his guilt, but it doesn’t. It makes no difference. Judas was not thinking of the Prophecy when he betrayed Jesus, he was thinking his own wicked thoughts. It is only IN HINDSIGHT that the evangelists notice that Judas fulfilled a prophecy. See?

Jesus did show many times that he foresaw the future, not based on what happened in the past. Look at Matthew 17: 24-27 🙂
May God Put His Bless on us.

I think we are very like each other brother Ambrose. Our desagreements does not separate us. Is like two people with different opinions but having great respect for each other.

I agree on that, God leaves Revelations in the Bible. It is why I use the Bible for achieve much of what I know. My disagreement is in the perception that, You can consult the Bible for foretell or interpret the future that came long ago after the writing of the Bible.

The men that wrote the Bible and some of the others Sacred Books or even the Apocrypha were sensitive people. They wrote about the world that they live on. In my culture we have a say, History repeat itself. Sometimes, the description of a fact witnessed by a sensitive soul seems to match what is happen later but is History that repeat itself.

The Prophecy is the attempt of to avoid to repeat bad things. Why mankind repeat itself? Because mankind is made from the same elements, does not matter what Age he lives. And I am not talking about the atomic elements. I am talking about envy, love, lusts, etcetera. What contributes for the repeatition is the lack of Knowledge.

If mankind already knew the consequences of the polution in the seventeen hundreds, maybe, today we were not talking about its effects. But you never know because the hungry for money in some is insatiable. But when the ones that call themselves of good guys and excuse themselves of act against the unjustices, then, the time for History repeat itself is open up.

I agree on that, God Does Interact Withim our History. I think we desagree just in the Way He Does. Our Fellow Jews and Christians defend the idea that, He intervene on our History. Even whispering on the ears of our Prophets for to make our Scriptures.

We desagree on the detail. Since the Material World were born God Left in it His Light. Which don’t need to be a visible or measurable one. The Light of God Is in the air (even on the figure of language that I used here). It is for all of us to hear. But mostly all of us don’t know how to be quiet enough for to capture It so well. Some of the sensitive are more capable of to do it. Usually we call them Prophets, even the ones that make bad use of his prophecies.

Since God Put His Light on our way He Does not Intervene anymore. Why not? His Light is known to us as Providence. Everything we need Is Already Provided by God. He Knew, even before any manifestation of what we call by the name of Beginning, what each one of us would need in every moment of our History.

So, He Provided The Whisper, The apparitions, The Communications etcetera. But He Did It Only For Good. The problem is that, we, until know, was not yet conscients of those things.

Why not? God Prepared us for be in evolution. We had to pass though the Age of Brutish to the Age of Love.

Why? Because God Don’t Want to be worshiped by robots. He Want To Be Worshiped by who does it by himself will. (Even I desagree with our theory of freewill. We have enough will for do that but not enough for to be called by free. And the reason for that, look at our History, if Herod, Nero or Hitler had freewill, what History we would have now?)

Why God Is not Effetively Present in our material world? Is simple. He Is Omnipresent, Omnipotent, Omniscient, Omniconscient and you can nominate a Infinite number of Powers. So, in His Effetive Presence we are unable of do anything without He Know. If we even think to do anything inconsequential at first but will have any bad consequence in the future, His Presence Imped us to do that. Not because would be a sin but Our Father’s Providence.

It is why I doubt the myth that says, had any revolt in Heaven. It is not rational or intelligent.

So, God Know what we will do. Even the bad things. Why He Does not Intervene? It is against His Will but is part of our evolution. He Already Knew the bad things that we would do but He Provided condictions for also not to do it.

But, If God Knew, Made us, and Intervene not, He would be accused of be partner on our sins. Not so quiet well interpretation. He Really Does Allow us to sin but not inspire us to do anything wrong.

To Be Continued
 
Sequence.

But He could not allow our sins. It is true. But we had to be His robots, not His Children. He Allows only because He Is The Only One with The Power of Supreme Healing. It mean that, He Will Remove all consequences of our sins at The End. All suffering will be removed, and all damage will be restored in an Way That Will be not any mark or bad remembrance.

What impede us of to understand it 100% is because some of us does not understand how time works and how works a Universe without time. What seems to us a entire life is just a God’s Blink of Eyes. But when God Speak To us in a matter of time, He Does not Speaks In His Way of Time. He Speaks In our ways because He Does not Speak In Ways that we could not understand.

I think I translated a good part of The Third and Last Testament just in that small space.

I hardly see what you saw in Matthew 17: 24-27. The problem is that, Jesus uses many parables, figures of language and comparisons. We can interpret in different manner. You use your eye of faith, I use eye of knowledge. I can’t believe as you do because I know passages where we find contradictions. If had not contradictions I would not doubt these one.

May God Send us what we are in lack for to be perfect.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top