T
twinc
Guest
What is wrong about the following words “I adore you with every breath that I breathe” and Acts.17:28 - twinc
maybe if you can give me some more lines for this song.What is wrong about the following words “I adore you with every breath that I breathe” and Acts.17:28 - twinc
I forget the song but I remember these words more as a saying than as a song and then it struck me that these words are wrong with reference to Acts.17:28 - twincHere’s the verse you mentioned:
Douay-Rheims Bible
For in him we live, and move, and are; as some also of your own poets said: For we are also his offspring.
And this is the website where I found it:
bible.cc/acts/17-28.htm
There are a lot of other translations too, but they’re all pretty much the same.
I don’t understand what the connection is between the song lyric and the verse. Perhaps reading the lyric in the context of the rest of the song would help. What’s the name of the song?
Does anybody really “adore” God with every breath they breathe??? I’d like to meet that person or be a fly on the wall.What is wrong about the following words “I adore you with every breath that I breathe” and Acts.17:28 - twinc
Well, Jesus became man to show us that it can indeed be done. Mary also, obviously, adored God with every breath. It can be done, we may just think that it can’t.Does anybody really “adore” God with every breath they breathe??? I’d like to meet that person or be a fly on the wall.
I think that would be a great achievement amidst the pressures and other stresses of our lives. If we did that, why would we need Church and sermons? Sounds like a lone-ranger Christian could have written those words.
so just about everything has been searched out and said except the most obvious to those who know and it is most imperative that all know here and elsewhere to tell others and give the glory where it belongs to a fantastic and intelligent designer even though many would rather stay blind and deny this - twincAre you double-posting on another site maybe? Covering all your bases? Not that there’s anything wrong with that, I suppose