Southern Baptists are everywhere

  • Thread starter Thread starter ericka1701
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ericka I’m so glad you’re able to feel more confident now.I think we never really stop learning(unless we choose to).

To answer other questions, I do not believe on OSAS, but if you go to the Baptist Faith and Message you will see it is a very seriously and strongly taught belief in the Baptist church. The whold OSAS issue is one thing that got me looking in other directions.
Some churches may not teach it, although I’ve been to Baptist churches in a lot of states and they all did, it is what they believe. Being Baptist, they can all preach what they feel God is leading them to preach in the way they want to preach it. Therefore, some don’t focus on the same things as others.
As for the whole redication issue, it’s not they are afraid (most of them) they weren’t really saved to begin with, it’s a matter of them realizing they haven’t been living like God would desire, or they may be moving into the next step I guess you could say and they are seeking a deeper relationship.
As for the Baptist who are trying to evangelize Catholics it’s because I think they likely don’t understand the Catholic Church and what the church really believes and teaches, especially if they continue to push once they find out you’re a Catholic.If they say ok great,then likely they’ve run into Catholics who are able to convey that yes they are doing just find spiritually. Thats why it’s so important for Catholics to know their stuff. If my friend who I orginially asked questions of hadn’t known the answers or the right answers who knows how much longer it would have taken for me to get on the path I’m on now.
Obviously I have no clue to whats in the heart of Baptist everywhere. I am speaking of my experiences and the experiences I have been told of personally. Although I am in RCIA I am always going to have an appreciation for the church that first lead me to a relationship with Christ. I know that all Southern Baptist are not as open minded as they should be, they have their issues for sure, they, in general love the Lord.
That was very informative Gr8full! Given your Baptist background, can I ask you for some advice? I have always been a Catholic and recently, as within the past year, I have become very devout and have grown so much deeper into my faith. However, my wife is a Baptist and we now have a four month old who came into this world 8 months after we married. I desperately want my family to be united under the Catholic Faith and my wife wants us to raise him up in both churches. I don’t agree with this. However, everytime we talk about our faiths, she gets very dismissive. She thinks it’s disguisting that we go to confession and has some major disagreements with the Catholic Church and My Faith. I’m not forcing or even pushing her into conversion, but have offered to explain why we believe what we do. Even when I show her quotes from the Bible backing up our beliefs, she says “nope Im never gonna believe that”. So how do I get her to see as you and others have eventually sought and came to the Truth?
 
Where I live, there are about 10 Southern Baptists to every Catholic. I have been able to explain very well to some about devotion, but not worship, to Saints and the Blessed Virgin. There is one issue that I have had trouble explaining, and that is why do Catholics go to confession. I have pointed out the bible verses about the binding and loosening of sins, and how Jesus gave that power to his disciples at the time, and how that power was passed through all priests at all time. I also tell them that I don’t confess my sins to the priest himself, but to God through the priest. However, I just don’t seem to get through to them about the need to go to confession, and I can’t convince them that I am not committing blasphemy (it seems that everything Catholics do, though, is blasphemy to them). If I can’t defend my faith to them, how am I going to defend my faith to the devil?
i spent the last 7 years in the deep south, i completely understand.

you have given them the correct answer they refuse to believe

time to make them argue on your terms.

ask them why they dont accept this scripture. why is G-ds word good until it comes to this?

why dont they believe in intercession, when G-d specifically commanded Job to pray on behalf of his friends who spoke ill of G-d

ask them why they arent catholic in light of matthew 16:18

ask them why they only give communion once in a while? do they only remember Jesus once in a while?

turn the tables on them, if you need help you can message me, i have a little experience with them.
 
They are attempting to draw you into an evangelical salvation script. Problem is - it’s wrong. You just need to preempt it by agreeing in common ground then turn it on them with proper teaching. Also understand the physchology of most fundamentalists. They mean well & honestly believe all that they say. But they are really fear driven and hung up on the whole protestant “saved” canard - its a false salvation based on the sin of presumption. Make them see the clear logic that NO ONE is saved UNTIL GOD judges them saved - anything else presumes to judge self or others in place of God! That is clearly a violation of God’s sovereignty.

Here I like the counter-script that Fr. John Martignoni uses & the key verse.

1 John 1:9, “If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just, and will forgive our sins and cleanse us from all unrighteousness.”

James
I often get the argument from my protestant friends that yes, Jesus did indeed give the Apostles the ability to bind and loose. But that there is nothing in Scripture to show that this power was passed on. Yes, Judas was replaced but it is not noted that the replacement was given this power in the same way that the original deciples were. How do I answer this?
 
Broski,
I don’t want to highjack the thread from Ericka but I think my advice for you applies to any Catholic in any type of relationship with a Baptist or other Protestant.
Be patient, wait on them to ask you questions and pray. I think I was open to the Church first and foremost because of the Holy Spirit, but I may have been more put off if I had not had a patient friend who did not give me too much info at once and answered only the questions I had at the time.
There is so much information involved with the church that it can be overwhelming. I think if you only answer the questions asked there is less chance of someone becoming overwhelmed.
I so agree with Mystic Warrior. I think it is a matter of the heart. If someone isn’t open to being lead to the church then the Holy Spirit isn’t going to force it on them. God doesn’t “make” us do anything. He wants us to come to him willingly,IMO.
As long as your wife is not causing a problem then I say pray for her. Support her in her spiritual growth, and as I said before, pray for God to give you the right words when you need them.
 
The New Testament is full of stories of sinners, verbally & publicly confessing their sins to Jesus. Ask them if Confession is not needed then why didn’t the Good Thief just pray silently on the cross for forgiveness? What about Mary Magdalene? Why didn’t she just pray silently for Jesus forgivenss? What about the tax collector who promises to make restitution? In all these cases, the repentant verbally acknowledges their wrongdoings in front of Jesus. (and in fact in front of entire crowds usually.)

How do Southern Baptists believe sins are forgiven and where do we have models/examples of their way in the Bible?
 
Broski,
I don’t want to highjack the thread from Ericka but I think my advice for you applies to any Catholic in any type of relationship with a Baptist or other Protestant.
Be patient, wait on them to ask you questions and pray. I think I was open to the Church first and foremost because of the Holy Spirit, but I may have been more put off if I had not had a patient friend who did not give me too much info at once and answered only the questions I had at the time.
There is so much information involved with the church that it can be overwhelming. I think if you only answer the questions asked there is less chance of someone becoming overwhelmed.
I so agree with Mystic Warrior. I think it is a matter of the heart. If someone isn’t open to being lead to the church then the Holy Spirit isn’t going to force it on them. God doesn’t “make” us do anything. He wants us to come to him willingly,IMO.
As long as your wife is not causing a problem then I say pray for her. Support her in her spiritual growth, and as I said before, pray for God to give you the right words when you need them.
Thanks Gr8full! I’m sorry Erika, I didn’t mean to highjack your thread. By the way Gr8full, she will ask a question and is very dismissive of my answer and actually won’t let me show her scripturally. So I guess the only way is to keep praying and trust in the Holy Spirit. Thanks Be to God!
 
Where I live, there are about 10 Southern Baptists to every Catholic. I have been able to explain very well to some about devotion, but not worship, to Saints and the Blessed Virgin. There is one issue that I have had trouble explaining, and that is why do Catholics go to confession. I have pointed out the bible verses about the binding and loosening of sins, and how Jesus gave that power to his disciples at the time, and how that power was passed through all priests at all time. I also tell them that I don’t confess my sins to the priest himself, but to God through the priest. However, I just don’t seem to get through to them about the need to go to confession, and I can’t convince them that I am not committing blasphemy (it seems that everything Catholics do, though, is blasphemy to them). If I can’t defend my faith to them, how am I going to defend my faith to the devil?
I used to be a Southern Baptist, and I served in the ministry. Don’t be so hard on yourself because you can’t make them see things the way they should. It is not you that will change their minds and hearts, it is only God who can do that. Southern Baptists have a misguided belief that we Catholics practice a bunch of empty ceremonies and it is very hard to get them to listen to us with an open mind about it. My approach is using the Early Church Fathers as a way to show them that the earliest Christians were not Southern Baptists, but Catholics, and that the Catholic Church teaches the same things now as it did 2000 years ago, which can be proven with documentation from the Church Fathers.

Of course most Southern Baptists that I have debated this with either have nothing to respond with or simply refuse to acknowledge the importance of that arguement and only want me and them to use the Bible alone. 95% of them have never even heard of the Church Fathers or have any idea who they are.

It is very hard to find people who are seekers of truth first that will acknowledge when you are correct, most people are not open minded enough to look at things from another angle. One of my favorite quotes comes from St. Augustine which I try to live by what he said here…

Advance with me when you share my certainty. Seek with me when you have the same doubts. Accept my interpretation when it is you who is in error. And win me over to yours if it is I who am wrong.
 
I used to be a Southern Baptist, and I served in the ministry. Don’t be so hard on yourself because you can’t make them see things the way they should. It is not you that will change their minds and hearts, it is only God who can do that. Southern Baptists have a misguided belief that we Catholics practice a bunch of empty ceremonies and it is very hard to get them to listen to us with an open mind about it. My approach is using the Early Church Fathers as a way to show them that the earliest Christians were not Southern Baptists, but Catholics, and that the Catholic Church teaches the same things now as it did 2000 years ago, which can be proven with documentation from the Church Fathers.

Of course most Southern Baptists that I have debated this with either have nothing to respond with or simply refuse to acknowledge the importance of that arguement and only want me and them to use the Bible alone. 95% of them have never even heard of the Church Fathers or have any idea who they are.

It is very hard to find people who are seekers of truth first that will acknowledge when you are correct, most people are not open minded enough to look at things from another angle. One of my favorite quotes comes from St. Augustine which I try to live by what he said here…

Advance with me when you share my certainty. Seek with me when you have the same doubts. Accept my interpretation when it is you who is in error. And win me over to yours if it is I who am wrong.
That was great!
 
I often get the argument from my protestant friends that yes, Jesus did indeed give the Apostles the ability to bind and loose. But that there is nothing in Scripture to show that this power was passed on. Yes, Judas was replaced but it is not noted that the replacement was given this power in the same way that the original deciples were. How do I answer this?
I have seen this too and it is extremely annoying since its clearly an attempt to scratch and claw at any lame excuse one can find to not have to accept the clear common sense teaching that authority is passed along by a succession of apostolic blessings just like ALL the famous OT figures did in blessing their first born and giving them inheritances or installing new High Priests and Kings etc. It is so ingrained in the traditions of the Jews that it is clear that succession is an integral part of The Church. Even Christ on the Cross was looking forward to pass on responsibility to John to take care of Mary and for Mary to take John as her son. Succession and carrying on The Way was clearly handed down (ref. Matthias, Polycarp, Timothy etc.).

I like Scripture Catholics arguments on Apostolic Succession:
Scripture Catholic: Authority is Transferred by the Sacrament of Ordination:
More here: scripturecatholic.com/apostolic_succession.html

Acts 1:15-26 - the first thing Peter does after Jesus ascends into heaven is implement apostolic succession. Matthias is ordained with full apostolic authority. Only the Catholic Church can demonstrate an unbroken apostolic lineage to the apostles in union with Peter through the sacrament of ordination and thereby claim to teach with Christ’s own authority.

Acts 1:20 - a successor of Judas is chosen. The authority of his office (his “bishopric”) is respected notwithstanding his egregious sin. The necessity to have apostolic succession in order for the Church to survive was understood by all. God never said, “I’ll give you leaders with authority for about 400 years, but after the Bible is compiled, you are all on your own.”

Acts 1:22 - literally, “one must be ordained” to be a witness with us of His resurrection. Apostolic ordination is required in order to teach with Christ’s authority.

Acts 6:6 - apostolic authority is transferred through the laying on of hands (ordination). This authority has transferred beyond the original twelve apostles as the Church has grown.

Acts 9:17-19 - even Paul, who was directly chosen by Christ, only becomes a minister after the laying on of hands by a bishop. This is a powerful proof-text for the necessity of sacramental ordination in order to be a legitimate successor of the apostles.

Acts 13:3 - apostolic authority is transferred through the laying on of hands (ordination). This authority must come from a Catholic bishop.

Acts 14:23 - the apostles and newly-ordained men appointed elders to have authority throughout the Church.

Acts 15:22-27 - preachers of the Word must be sent by the bishops in union with the Church. We must trace this authority to the apostles.

2 Cor. 1:21-22 - Paul writes that God has commissioned certain men and sealed them with the Holy Spirit as a guarantee.

Col 1:25 - Paul calls his position a divine “office.” An office has successors. It does not terminate at death. Or it’s not an office. See also Heb. 7:23 – an office continues with another successor after the previous office-holder’s death.

1 Tim. 3:1 - Paul uses the word “episcopoi” (bishop) which requires an office. Everyone understood that Paul’s use of episcopoi and office meant it would carry on after his death by those who would succeed him.

1 Tim. 4:14 - again, apostolic authority is transferred through the laying on of hands (ordination).

1 Tim. 5:22 - Paul urges Timothy to be careful in laying on the hands (ordaining others). The gift of authority is a reality and cannot be used indiscriminately.

2 Tim. 1:6 - Paul again reminds Timothy the unique gift of God that he received through the laying on of hands.

2 Tim. 4:1-6 - at end of Paul’s life, Paul charges Timothy with the office of his ministry . We must trace true apostolic lineage back to a Catholic bishop.

2 Tim. 2:2 - this verse shows God’s intention is to transfer authority to successors (here, Paul to Timothy to 3rd to 4th generation). It goes beyond the death of the apostles.

Titus 1:5; Luke 10:1 - the elders of the Church are appointed and hold authority. God has His children participate in Christ’s work.

1 John 4:6 - whoever knows God listens to us (the bishops and the successors to the apostles). This is the way we discern truth and error (not just by reading the Bible and interpreting it for ourselves).

Exodus 18:25-26 - Moses appoints various heads over the people of God. We see a hierarchy, a transfer of authority and succession.

Exodus 40:15 - the physical anointing shows that God intended a perpetual priesthood with an identifiable unbroken succession.

Numbers 3:3 - the sons of Aaron were formally “anointed” priests in “ordination” to minister in the priests’ “office.”

Numbers 16:40 - shows God’s intention of unbroken succession within His kingdom on earth. Unless a priest was ordained by Aaron and his descendants, he had no authority.

Numbers 27:18-20 - shows God’s intention that, through the “laying on of hands,” one is commissioned and has authority.

Deut. 34:9 - Moses laid hands upon Joshua, and because of this, Joshua was obeyed as successor, full of the spirit of wisdom.

Sirach 45:15 - Moses ordains Aaron and anoints him with oil. There is a transfer of authority through formal ordination.
James
 
I don’t mind the thread being “hijacked” at all… in fact, it has given me many answers to questions I didn’t even know I had. I also now have more questions, but I’m starting to get the picture that I will never know everything there is to know… And that’s a really hard pill for me to take, because I do have a bit of pride of the knowledge that I do have… and at the same time a drive to learn everything possible (V’ger anyone?)… And I also overanalyze everything.

May God quiet down my mind, if it’s His will. Especially since it’s 0100 and I need to sleep.

God Bless!

Ericka
 
I often get the argument from my protestant friends that yes, Jesus did indeed give the Apostles the ability to bind and loose. But that there is nothing in Scripture to show that this power was passed on. Yes, Judas was replaced but it is not noted that the replacement was given this power in the same way that the original deciples were. How do I answer this?
I would ask why the person thinks it would need to be stated.

I work in a middle school, and as it happens, teachers will sometimes leave for one reason or another in the middle of the school year. A new teacher will be hired to replace her. When the new teacher enters the classroom, the students don’t demand to know if she has the same authority that the old teacher had. They don’t say, “Mrs. Smith had the authority to give us exams and grade our papers, but you don’t.” They know that she does, by virtue of her having taken over the position.
The principal of the school does not have to go into the classroom and tell the students that the new teacher has the same authority as the one she replaced, because the authority is not specific to the person, it is held in the position. Whoever is in the position has the authority for how ever long he holds the position.
 
Many of the things we believe come not necessarily just from the Bible, but from the Magisterium and Tradition also. If they don’t accept the Magisterium, it’s a bit more difficult to convince them of some of our beliefs.
It may be helpful to teach them first a bit of history. I would bet that almost none of them know that they got the Bible from the Catholic Church, (and then removed some of it). They would also probably be shocked to learn that all Christian faiths are offshoots of the Catholic Church, or offshoots of other offshoots.
Here’s a link from the apologetics section of a Church in Picayune, Ms. (definitely Baptist country) which has a really good document on the Bible. Be sure to click on the next page tab on the bottom to see the whole document:
scborromeo.org/index2.htm
As I said, I married a Southern Baptist. Her grandmother died convinced I was going straight to Hell. My niece asked my daughter if Catholics were Christians. (For some reason, they never ask these questions of the apologist in the family…) In my case, my wife saw the wisdom of baptizing our children (as infants). Later, when we took a trip with a priest friend of mine, she got to spend some time with him. She finally saw he didn’t have horns growing out of his head and shortly thereafter, enrolled in RCIA!
 
I don’t mind the thread being “hijacked” at all… in fact, it has given me many answers to questions I didn’t even know I had. I also now have more questions, but I’m starting to get the picture that I will never know everything there is to know… And that’s a really hard pill for me to take, because I do have a bit of pride of the knowledge that I do have… and at the same time a drive to learn everything possible (V’ger anyone?)… And I also overanalyze everything.

May God quiet down my mind, if it’s His will. Especially since it’s 0100 and I need to sleep.

God Bless!

Ericka
I hope you got some sleep:) Of course we will not know everything there is to know because that is reserved to God, but it is ok to be pleased that you have learned so much, and continue to learn as much as you can. And don’t worry about trying to defend your faith to the devil–he already knows the truth.
 
Where I live, there are about 10 Southern Baptists to every Catholic. I have been able to explain very well to some about devotion, but not worship, to Saints and the Blessed Virgin. There is one issue that I have had trouble explaining, and that is why do Catholics go to confession. I have pointed out the bible verses about the binding and loosening of sins, and how Jesus gave that power to his disciples at the time, and how that power was passed through all priests at all time. I also tell them that I don’t confess my sins to the priest himself, but to God through the priest. However, I just don’t seem to get through to them about the need to go to confession, and I can’t convince them that I am not committing blasphemy (it seems that everything Catholics do, though, is blasphemy to them). If I can’t defend my faith to them, how am I going to defend my faith to the devil?
Confession and Forgiveness of Sin via the Priesthood Proved from Scripture

Some people object to the Sacrament of Reconciliation (commonly called “Confession”) on the basis that they only need to confess their sins directly to God rather than to a priest. Is this perspective correct? Let’s see what the Bible has to say.

Leviticus 5:5-6
5 " 'When anyone is guilty in any of these ways, he must confess in what way he has sinned 6 and, as a penalty for the sin he has committed, he must bring to the LORD a female lamb or goat from the flock as a sin offering; and the priest shall make atonement for him for his sin.

Notice that the Word of God says, “the priest shall make atonement.” Clearly in the Old Testament, the priesthood existed to offer sacrifices and make atonement for the sins committed by the people. Does this idea continue in the New Testament?

Hebrews 10:1
1 The law is only a shadow of the good things that are coming—not the realities themselves.

Here the author of Hebrews instructs us that the Old Testament prefigures and foreshadows New Testament truths; the Old is revealed more fully in the New. This seems to suggest that the role of the priest (ie, making atonement) as described in Leviticus should reveal something to us about the New Testament priesthood. So, what does the New Testament teach us about confession of sin?

1 John 1:9
9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness.

We should confess our sins, and God will forgive us, but do we confess our sins to God alone? No!

James 5:13-16
13 Is any one of you in trouble? He should pray. Is anyone happy? Let him sing songs of praise. 14 Is any one of you sick? He should call the elders of the church to pray over him and anoint him with oil in the name of the Lord. 15 And the prayer offered in faith will make the sick person well; the Lord will raise him up. If he has sinned, he will be forgiven. 16 Therefore confess your sins to each other and pray for each other so that you may be healed.

Here the word of God tells us to call the elders (the Greek word is presbuteroi, or “presbyter”, from which the English word “priest” is derived). So, in this context, James is telling us to send for the priests who will pray over someone who is sick, and if he has sinned, he will be forgiven. Recalling the passage from Leviticus above, we see there is a strong parallel between the priests of the Old Testament who made atonement for sin and the presbyters or priests of the New Testament to whom we confess sins for forgiveness. But this sounds like blasphemy! Can men really forgive sins? This same question is asked in the New Testament.

(cont.)
 
Mark 2:5-7
5 When Jesus saw their faith, he said to the paralytic, “Son, your sins are forgiven.” 6Now some teachers of the law were sitting there, thinking to themselves, 7"Why does this fellow talk like that? He’s blaspheming! Who can forgive sins but God alone?"

Who can forgive sins but God alone? This question is often asked by those who seek to deny the sacrament of confession. However, note that this question is asked by the scribes who did not accept Jesus. Those who quote this passage find themselves on the side of those who rejected the Messiah. There’s more to the story, however; let’s consider the same incident from the book of Matthew.

Matthew 9:1-7
1 Jesus stepped into a boat, crossed over and came to his own town. 2Some men brought to him a paralytic, lying on a mat. When Jesus saw their faith, he said to the paralytic, “Take heart, son; your sins are forgiven.” 3 At this, some of the teachers of the law said to themselves, “This fellow is blaspheming!” 4 Knowing their thoughts, Jesus said, “Why do you entertain evil thoughts in your hearts? 5Which is easier: to say, ‘Your sins are forgiven,’ or to say, ‘Get up and walk’? 6But so that you may know that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins…” Then he said to the paralytic, “Get up, take your mat and go home.” 7And the man got up and went home. 8When the crowd saw this, they were filled with awe; and they praised God, who had given such authority to men.

The Bible teaches that God had given the authority to forgive sins “to men”. Note that this is not “to a man” but “to men” – plural. So, it is not only Jesus who has authority to forgive sins – “men” have this authority, also. This sounds like a “hard teaching”…is there confirmation of this in the Bible?

John 20:21-23
21 Again Jesus said,"Peace be with you! As the Father has sent me, I am sending you."22 And with that he breathed on them and said, “Receive the Holy Spirit. 23 If you forgive anyone his sins, they are forgiven; if you do not forgive them, they are not forgiven.”

How did God send Jesus into the world? With the authority to forgive sins as we saw in Matthew 9:6. How does Jesus send the Apostles? In the same way that the Father had sent Him…with the authority to forgive sins as we have just seen in John 20:23. How could the Apostles obey the commandment of Jesus to forgive sins unless they heard these sins confessed?

Finally, we find that the Apostle Paul himself forgave the sins of others acting in persona Christi or “in the person of Christ” – just as the Catholic Church teaches concerning the sacrament of reconciliation.

2 Corinthians 2:10
10To whom ye forgive any thing, I forgive also: for if I forgave any thing, to whom I forgave it, for your sakes forgave I it in the person of Christ; (KJV)

And to whom you have pardoned any thing, I also. For, what I have pardoned, if I have pardoned any thing, for your sakes have I done it in the person of Christ. (Douay Rheims)

Can we go directly to God for the forgiveness of our sins? Of course, but the scriptures just presented suggest that the normative means of forgiveness is by confession to a priest, and while it is true that only God can forgive sins, the Bible teaches that He has chosen to do so through the ordained priesthood and the Sacrament of Reconciliation that He Himself instituted.
 
Answer their questions but also ask them questions about the Real Presence, leadership of pope or all kinds of miracles that happenned in the CC. God bless!
 
Where I live, there are about 10 Southern Baptists to every Catholic. I have been able to explain very well to some about devotion, but not worship, to Saints and the Blessed Virgin. There is one issue that I have had trouble explaining, and that is why do Catholics go to confession. I have pointed out the bible verses about the binding and loosening of sins, and how Jesus gave that power to his disciples at the time, and how that power was passed through all priests at all time. I also tell them that I don’t confess my sins to the priest himself, but to God through the priest. However, I just don’t seem to get through to them about the need to go to confession, and I can’t convince them that I am not committing blasphemy (it seems that everything Catholics do, though, is blasphemy to them). If I can’t defend my faith to them, how am I going to defend my faith to the devil?
Just stare them straight in the eye, calming explain our Beliefs and then politely leave.😉

The Catholic Answers Home has really good information on all these subjects. They help me a lot.
 
I often get the argument from my protestant friends that yes, Jesus did indeed give the Apostles the ability to bind and loose. But that there is nothing in Scripture to show that this power was passed on. Yes, Judas was replaced but it is not noted that the replacement was given this power in the same way that the original deciples were. How do I answer this?
It also isn’t noted that they were not. If your inability to prove it means it isn’t true, then surely their inability to prove that it didn’t happen makes that untrue as well? Our traditions go back to the time of Christ - theirs, if they’re lucky, go back to the time of Luther and Calvin, among others. I’d say the burden of proof is on them.
 
Catholics seek the Confessional because it is the one place Southern Baptists aren’t to be found. 😉

Southern Baptists actually publicly confess all the time. They do so at altar calls. (“If you’re struggling with obedience to God today, come on down here…”)

They also do so in small groups and on retreats, which is very scary to see as an outsider because it really smacks of public humiliation.

Keep in mind that they tend to demand “your testimony”, which only really is judged sound by them if there’s a good, juicy “bottom” to it like you see on “Intervention”. This is a product of their erroneous believe that one must be able to point to a single shocking event of one’s conversion, as though everyone needed to be struck blind by Christ like St Paul rather than simply dropping their net like St Peter.

I find them to be very hypocritical on this topic, condemning the Catholic practice of confessing to a priest acting in persona christi while demanding that one bare one’s soul to people with no authority and quite often malicious intent toward gossip and shunning one’s neighbor.

The converts from this community no doubt can offer many examples.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top