Speaking against the Holy Spirit

  • Thread starter Thread starter At_His_Feet_1
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
A

At_His_Feet_1

Guest
If God the Father, the Son, and Holy Spirit are 3 persons but one in the same, then why is it blasphomy to speak against the Holy Spirit only?

“And whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him: but whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come.”
 
I typically see the Holy Spirit as the person of God who interacts with us. When God forgives, I see it being issued by God the Father and carried out, or offered, by the Holy Spirit. And as Catholics, we know that God the Father offers forgiveness to all, but we must accept it. Forgiveness is a gift from God, and even in the Bible we see that gifts are handed out by the Holy Spirit.

And as Catholic teaching says, this reference to blaspheming against the Holy Spirit means that we cannot be forgiven if we deny the forgiveness offered and hold onto our sin, all while knowing it is sin. This is why it is called the only unforgivable sin, because while forgiveness is being offered, it is rejected. You can’t have what you don’t receive. If someone offered you a gift, and you reject it, you don’t receive that gift. The same goes for forgiveness.

And it is because the Holy Spirit is sent to offer the gift, that it is said to be against the Holy Spirit.

A little round about way, but I hope this helps.
 
There is a term in Catholic theology called “appropriation”. While each of God’s acts in human history involves all three Persons, generally speaking, acts of power are “appropriated” (attributed) to the Father, acts of wisdom to the Son, acts of love to the Holy Spirit. The indwelling of God and his sanctifying action in our souls are appropriated to the Holy Spirit, so you can see how impenitence could be called a sin against the Holy Spirit.
 
From the Haydock Commentary:
Ver. 32. Whosoever, &c. It was their duty to have a knowledge of the Holy Ghost, and they obstinately refused to admit what was clear and manifest. Though they were ignorant of the divinity of Jesus Christ, and might take him to be merely the son of a poor artizan, they could not be ignorant that the expelling of demons, and miraculous healing of all diseases, were the works of the Holy Ghost. If, therefore, they refused to do penance for the insult offered to the Spirit of God, in the person of Christ, they could not hope to escape condign punishment. (St. Chrysostom, hom. xlii). — Against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him; i.e. they who for want of sufficient instruction, were invincibly ignorant that Christ was God, might more easily be brought to the true knowledge and faith of Christ, and so receive forgiveness of their sins: but if he shall speak against the Holy Ghost, i.e. against the Spirit of God in Christ, and shall oppose the known truth, by attributing to the devil that doctrine, and those miracles, which evidently were from the Spirit and the hand of God, that sin shall never be forgiven him. But how is this consistent with the Catholic doctrine and belief, that there is no sin any man commits of which he may not obtain pardon in this life? To this I answer, that in what manner soever we expound this place, it is an undoubted point of Christian faith, that there is no sin which our merciful God is not ready to pardon; no sin, for the remission of which, God hath not left a power in his Church, as it is clearly proved by those words, Whose sins you shall forgive, they are forgiven them, &c. St. Chrysostom therefore expounds these words, shall not be forgiven them, to imply no more, than shall scarcely, or seldom be forgiven; that is, it is very hard for such sinners to return to God, by a true and sincere repentance and conversion; so that this sentence is like to that (Matthew xix. 26.) where Christ seems to call it an impossible thing for a rich man to be saved. In the same place St. Chrysostom tells us, that some of those who had blasphemed against the Holy Ghost, repented, and had their sins forgiven them. St. Augustine, by this blasphemy against the Spirit, understands the sin of final impenitence, by which an obstinate sinner refuseth to be converted, and therefore lives and dies hardened in his sins. (Witham) — Nor in the world to come. From these words St. Augustine (De Civ. lib. xxi. chap. 13.) and St. Gregory (Dial. iv, chap. 39.) gather, that some sins may be remitted in the world to come; and consequently that there is a purgatory, or a middle place. (Challoner) — St. Augustine says these words would not be true, if some sins were not forgiven in the world to come; and St. Gregory says, we are to believe from these words in the existence of the fire of purgatory, to expiate our smaller offences, before the day of judgment. St. Isidore and Ven. Bede say the same. St. Bernard, speaking of heretics, says, they do not believe in purgatory: let them then inquire of our Saviour, what he meant by these words. — It is well known that Ven. Bede, on his death-bed, bestowed several small tokens to the monks who were present, that they might remember to pray for his soul in the holy sacrifice of the mass. (Haydock)
Ver. 33. Either make the tree good, &c. This is connected with what had been said of their attributing his works to Beelzebub. He condemns them for blaspheming him on all occasions, when at the same time they were not able to find fault with his life and doctrine. Christ therefore tells them, that the tree is known by its fruit; and that if they cannot blame his actions, and his doctrine, they ought to allow him to be good, to be like the good tree; and that if they continue to blame him, they ought consequently to condemn his doctrine, yet this they were not able to do. (Witham)
Ver. 29. See St. Matthew xii. 32. — Of an everlasting sin; i.e. of eternal punishment. (Witham) — What is here called everlasting offence, is (as St. Matthew expresseth it) that which shall neither be remitted in this life, nor in the life to come; which words would not be true, says St. Augustine, if some sins were not forgiven in the world to come. Now, as no mortal sin can be forgiven after death, there must necessarily be smaller transgressions, which we call venial; though many of our separated brethren will needs have all sins to be mortal; which is very far from a comfortable tenet.
 
Is it not an offence to God and therefore also the holy ghost when people who are saying the our father prayer use the words “lead us not into temptation”??

This is suggesting that it is God who tempts us to sin rather than satan.

God never leads us to temptation but rather he helps us when we look to him in a moment of temptation.

Without the help of God when we are being tempted we ultimately fall into sin as we are weak and more inclined to evil.

Therefore when saying the our father we should petition God to “let us not fall into temptation” which is the more accurate English translation.

This is very important as to accuse God of causing us to sin is heresy and is hurtful to God.

Think about it…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top