1
123me
Guest
[SIGN][/SIGN]Doesn’t the temple point to heaven, the place Christ will be worshipped as King? Just a thought ie it reflects the majesty of the kingdom to come
Not to boast, but I do live a very simple lifestyle and I receive the most happiness from doing so, even if at times it can be uncomfortable.Where and how do you live? An individual should lead by example for the Church to take note. Many people in the world can’t afford internet or a computer, why do you feel privileged to own one of your own?
In fact, let’s get rid of all our communal libraries, parks, and public spaces and use the money to take care of today’s poor - and leave nothing on wasted splendor for our children and their children.
You miss the point. I have enough just to barely get by, I have no surplus to spend on luxury. Even if I did have a surplus to spend needlessly to live in a mansion just for me, that would be sinful because that surplus could have alleviated human suffering.Humble house? What’s that - many poor have no houses - sell that too.
I’m sure there are even more simpler ways to live and give more to poorer folks.Not to boast, but I do live a very simple lifestyle and I receive the most happiness from doing so, even if at times it can be uncomfortable.
Many poor have no internet.Also, my internet doesnt cost me millions.
Jesus walked, why don’t we all. Besides, before cars, the Pope was carried in something called a Sedia - this was eco-friendly, inexpensive and easy for all to see. Except people called it extravagant and too pomp.The pope also advised to drive modest cars for example, something that Jesus would drive.
Most of the world’s poor live like this:That seems to negate the notion that one can splurge and waste money needlessly (which can be used to help poor.people) as long as one also gives to the poor.
If I gave up my “wealth” to be poor, I wouldn’t be able to help the poor!I’m sure there are even more simpler ways to live and give more to poorer folks.
Many poor have no internet.
Jesus walked, why don’t we all. Besides, before cars, the Pope was carried in something called a Sedia - this was eco-friendly, inexpensive and easy for all to see. Except people called it extravagant and too pomp.Most of the world’s poor live like this:
flickr.com/photos/ericparker/13369245745/in/photostream/
Would you be willing to give up your wealth of over 1000000X what they make per year and live like this?
Aaah you do understand… when it comes to yourself. Now apply that to everyone else to a degree.If I gave up my “wealth” to be poor, I wouldn’t be able to help the poor!
Needless according to you. I’m sure they could have spent more and cut back as needed to get the items that are necessary.The Church spent millions needlessly on a cathesral. Millions! Not building millions on it wouldn’t have driven the Church into the groubd with poverty AND they’d be able to alleviate han suffering even more with all those millions. See the difference?
Your original post said “Material kingdom.” You did not say “Materialistic kingdom.” Which do you wish to discuss - material kingdom or materialistic kingdom? It is not realistic to think that Christ’s legitimate authority on earth does not need things of the earth with which to operate.Thats not the same as materialistic kingdom. Christ said if His kingdom were of this world, his servants would prevent His arrest. He affirmed His kingdom was not of this world.
Not just when it comes to me. Again, I repeat, the Church shouldn’t not have a building, just not a multimillion dollar building with a coffee shop and ATM on premises. Cant you see the difference?Aaah you do understand… when it comes to yourself. Now apply that to everyone else to a degree.
According to.me? So youre saying the church needed a multimillion dollar cathedral or else it could not function? An ordinary but nice building wouldn’t suffice?Needless according to you. I’m sure they could have spent more and cut back as needed to get the items that are necessary.
Multimillion dollar cathedrals, for starters.Where would you like the church to cut back first - safety equipment? Licensed architects? Fair wages for construction workers? Insurance for everyone? Permits? Lighting? Books?
I don’t think Jesus would drive, he would walk, ride a donkey, or take a boat… Oh waitNot to boast, but I do live a very simple lifestyle and I receive the most happiness from doing so, even if at times it can be uncomfortable.
Also, my internet doesnt cost me millions.
The pope also advised to drive modest cars for example, something that Jesus would drive. That seems to negate the notion that one can splurge and waste money needlessly (which can be used to help poor.people) as long as one also gives to the poor.
What if the coffee shop is collecting money for the poor, as opposed to having the congregation spend it at starbucks?Not just when it comes to me. Again, I repeat, the Church shouldn’t not have a building, just not a multimillion dollar building with a coffee shop and ATM on premises. Cant you see the difference?
Not every diocese can afford a multimillion dollar cathedral, those that can usually have millions of members. Why shouldn’t they pool their money for something that lasts longer than the next tornado or is in endless need of repairs?According to.me? So youre saying the church needed a multimillion dollar cathedral or else it could not function? An ordinary but nice building wouldn’t suffice?
I guess we should start hiring illegal laborers and chinese architects paid less than a living wage to reduce the cost of construction in the 1st world. I’ve worked in the building/construction/architecture field - the upcharge on top of labor and goods is inflated 60%-120%. Tell the builders, plumbers, architects, etc to stop asking for so much money.Multimillion dollar cathedrals, for starters.
Does the cathedral really need a coffee shop and ATM on premises? Does that really lend to the idea of either necessity or modesty in any way?If you want to build and maintain any type of building that can be used for hundreds (if not thousands) of people at a time, you simply cannot do so for under a million dollars. Spending “millions of dollars” is not extravagant. That’s the reality of modern real estate.
Does the cathedral really need a coffee shop and ATM on premises? Does that really lend to the idea of either necessity or modesty in any way?
If Jesus lived amongst us in the 21st century He’d drive a modest car no doubt. I don’t see Him driving a Lamborgini to strike awe and splendor into the hearts of HIs potential followers so that we take Him more seriously.I don’t think Jesus would drive, he would walk, ride a donkey, or take a boat… Oh wait![]()
That’s not the issue. The issue is the money that was used without necessity could have been used to help the poor while still having a modest building that got the job done. Again, Pope Francis and his car example made it quite clear that the notion of living in luxury only as long as you help the poor is false.You are assuming that nice places of worship are a waste of money and don’t help the poor.
This isn’t necessity. Placing high value on material artwork, even if historical, is contrary to the direct teachings of Christ that urged the rich man to give everything he had to the poor.I am considered “poor” and I would be very upset if my local Church sold off all their artwork (what little they have) or if my local Cathedral and Basilica sold off their artwork. Where could I then go to see and learn about the history of my Church and indeed just history (my secular highschool took a field trip to these local Churches to learn about architecture and art.(They are neo-romanesque and neo-gothic Churches).
Where is such a mandate given?It also appears that you have a very skewed idea of what our worship is supposed to look like. Such things like precious metals and an appropriate crucifix are mandated by our books and traditions.
It detracts from the concepts of moedesty and humility, especially when the Church itself fervently preaches these things. So by your logic, it’s ok when it comes to the Church but not for anyone else?What’s wrong with an ATM on premises - you prefer people waste gas, harming the environment and raising their carbon footprint by driving to the nearest bank to get $20 to donate to the poor at the church?
To my knowledge, nobody was asked to pool their money for a multimillion dollar cathedral.Not every diocese can afford a multimillion dollar cathedral, those that can usually have millions of members. Why shouldn’t they pool their money for something that lasts longer than the next tornado or is in endless need of repairs?
How is it that any other organization and its buildings can hold hundreds of people for their services without spending millions and millions of dollars? Sure money is going to be needed, but 18-20 million? Do the floors really have to be made of marble or could any standard floor have done? Seriously?I guess we should start hiring illegal laborers and chinese architects paid less than a living wage to reduce the cost of construction in the 1st world. I’ve worked in the building/construction/architecture field - the upcharge on top of labor and goods is inflated 60%-120%. Tell the builders, plumbers, architects, etc to stop asking for so much money.
Most restaurants, stores, grocers and public sidewalks have ATMs - it doesn’t evoke the concept of opulence to me, only convenience.It detracts from the concepts of moedesty and humility, especially when the Church itself fervently preaches these things. So by your logic, it’s ok when it comes to the Church but not for anyone else?
So the money appeared out of nowhere, or is your local bishop a secret billionaire investment banker?To my knowledge, nobody was asked to pool their money for a multimillion dollar cathedral.
You are comparing the Catholic Church to some flybynite outfit which uses a strip mall, and shag carpeting; until the people leave and go to the next flybynite?How is it that any other organization and its buildings can hold hundreds of people for their services without spending millions and millions of dollars? Sure money is going to be needed, but 18-20 million? Do the floors really have to be made of marble or could any standard floor have done? Seriously?
Revelation 21 “he carried me away to a great, high mountain and showed me the holy city Jerusalem coming down out of heaven from God. 11 It has the glory of God and a radiance like a very rare jewel, like jasper, clear as crystal. 12 It has a great, high wall with twelve gates, and at the gates twelve angels, and on the gates are inscribed the names of the twelve tribes of the Israelites; 13 on the east three gates, on the north three gates, on the south three gates, and on the west three gates. 14 And the wall of the city has twelve foundations, and on them are the twelve names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.15 The angel[g] who talked to me had a measuring rod of gold to measure the city and its gates and walls. 16 The city lies foursquare, its length the same as its width; and he measured the city with his rod, fifteen hundred miles;[h] its length and width and height are equal. 17 He also measured its wall, one hundred forty-four cubits* by human measurement, which the angel was using. 18 The wall is built of jasper, while the city is pure gold, clear as glass. 19 The foundations of the wall of the city are adorned with every jewel; the first was jasper, the second sapphire, the third agate, the fourth emerald, 20 the fifth onyx, the sixth carnelian, the seventh chrysolite, the eighth beryl, the ninth topaz, the tenth chrysoprase, the eleventh jacinth, the twelfth amethyst. 21 And the twelve gates are twelve pearls, each of the gates is a single pearl, and the street of the city is pure gold, transparent as glass.”*Why do we see such multimillion dollar cathedrals and wealth in the Church? …