SPLIT: Paying for Faith Formation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Timothy3_15
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
To use the same logic, providing Communion has costs as well. Should we have someone take cash and checks in front of the line before one is allowed to receive the Sacrament?
They do - it’s called “the collection.” 😉
We’ve never relied on mandatory classes to teach our children the Faith. We’ve sent them because it is mandatory in order to receive the sacraments. Ask my kids what they’ve learned and they’ll tell you “arts and crafts.”
And yet, when you ask them, they know their faith, as well - but instead of doing memory drills like we did in the old days, they are making things that help them remember the facts that they need to retain.

Don’t completely discount these creative teaching methods - I once had a group of fifty surly teenagers memorize all 12 fruits of the Holy Spirit in a single evening, by making “fruit trees” and naming their fruits after the Fruits of the Holy Spirit. And most of them retained the information long enough to tell it to the Bishop three weeks later when he asked them, as well. 🙂

They all thought the exercise was cheesy as all get out - but hey, they remembered the information, which is all I was interested in. 😛
 
Whether or not it is a sin to be in debt, it has nothing to do with the parish staff - even the priest can only work there for five years at maximum - it is the members of the parish - those who live in the neighborhood - who decide what loans to take out for their parish church, and what building projects they want to do. These things have absolutely nothing to do with the parish staff - they can only work with what they are given by the members of the parish who are on the Finance Council - that is to say, you and your fellow parishioners. It is your decision, as a person who lives in your parish boundaries, what debts your parish takes on, or not.

If you have chosen not to participate in the life of your parish, that is also not the fault of your parish staff members.

He cannot have even been there for “a decade and a half.” He is only allowed to be in the same parish for five years at maximum. He has obviously inherited his predecessor’s predecessor’s debt - if it was ever the priest’s debt to begin with.

I know lots of programs that are run entirely by volunteers - they typically are not very successful, because people’s day jobs get in the way.

For example, how are you supposed to go and visit the schools during school hours to talk to the children about the Sacraments, if you work from 9 to 5 to pay your bills, and can only meet the youth in the evenings? (But they have never seen you before, and their parents don’t know you, so they don’t come, because you never visit the schools … ) 🤷
About the five year maximum rule-I can think of multiple priests right off the top of my head who have been at the same parish for over five years at a time. Either that rule is not universal, or it is easily dispensed with when bishops find it expedient to do so.
 
About the five year maximum rule-I can think of multiple priests right off the top of my head who have been at the same parish for over five years at a time. Either that rule is not universal, or it is easily dispensed with when bishops find it expedient to do so.
And even if he can be there longer, only the Finance Council can decide what debts to take on for the parish, since they are the ones who have to live in the parish for their whole lives.

The priest can make suggestions, but it is up to the Finance Council (lay members of the parish who live within the boundaries) who can make those decisions.
 
OK, this seems to be a thread of actively interested parties…
To use the same logic, providing Communion has costs as well. Should we have someone take cash and checks in front of the line before one is allowed to receive the Sacrament?

There isn’t a sacrament that doesn’t incur some costs. The question is, do we charge per sacrament or rely on God to provide volunteers and tithes from those who are moved to do so?
The last time I checked, they pass the baskets around at every Sunday Mass.

According to the precept of the Church, everyone with the means, not everyone who “is moved to do so” is required to contribute to that collection, whether or not they do it at exactly that time. Is the Church requiring us to “pay for the sacraments” by making it a precept of the Church that the faithful are required to support the Church and its works, and that alms for the poor don’t count towards this?

I’ve never heard of a parish that will not waive the cost of sacramental preparation for those who say they cannot afford it. I have heard of bishops who waive sacramental preparation at the parish level for those children whose parents have demonstrated that their child does not need any additional instruction, but it was because the child didn’t need the preparation, not because the parents aren’t inclined to pay for it.

Parishes don’t have to be carrying around some large debt to come to the conclusion that parents with the obligation to see that their children are educated need to help shoulder some of the financial cost. I would not be surprised, in fact, if attendance is higher when there is a charge, since people value things more highly when there is a co-pay required, whether it is education, medical care, or reduced-cost legal help. If you don’t charge for it, the service is treated as if it is not worth anything. That seems to be human nature, or at least the nature of the humans in our society.
 
He cannot have even been there for “a decade and a half.” He is only allowed to be in the same parish for five years at maximum.
That would be a local rule to your diocese, not for the Church in general. The common term for a pastor here in the Archdiocese of Detroit is a 7 year assignment, and it is renewable as the bishop sees fit.

So yes, depending on the diocese and the circumstances, it is quite possible for a priest to be at a parish for 15 years.
 
And even if he can be there longer, only the Finance Council can decide what debts to take on for the parish, since they are the ones who have to live in the parish for their whole lives.

The priest can make suggestions, but it is up to the Finance Council (lay members of the parish who live within the boundaries) who can make those decisions.
I don’t think that’s a universal rule. I’ve heard of situations (from a trustworthy authority who had a parish position) where pastors didn’t made decisions, not suggetions, concerning parish finances.
 
OK, this seems to be a thread of actively interested parties…

The last time I checked, they pass the baskets around at every Sunday Mass.

According to the precept of the Church, everyone with the means, not everyone who “is moved to do so” is required to contribute to that collection, whether or not they do it at exactly that time. Is the Church requiring us to “pay for the sacraments” by making it a precept of the Church that the faithful are required to support the Church and its works, and that alms for the poor don’t count towards this?

I’ve never heard of a parish that will not waive the cost of sacramental preparation for those who say they cannot afford it. I have heard of bishops who waive sacramental preparation at the parish level for those children whose parents have demonstrated that their child does not need any additional instruction, but it was because the child didn’t need the preparation, not because the parents aren’t inclined to pay for it.

Parishes don’t have to be carrying around some large debt to come to the conclusion that parents with the obligation to see that their children are educated need to help shoulder some of the financial cost. I would not be surprised, in fact, if attendance is higher when there is a charge, since people value things more highly when there is a co-pay required, whether it is education, medical care, or reduced-cost legal help. If you don’t charge for it, the service is treated as if it is not worth anything. That seems to be human nature, or at least the nature of the humans in our society.
Exactly: that’s what the collection basket is for. How do children receiving First Communion get excluded from the rest of us who walk up to receive without a burden of paying directly for the sacrament?

Every single sacrament has costs. Tell me why this one is fine to charge for but the others are not?

As for sounding like I have a bone to pick about this issue, if someone suggested to you that we should charge parishioners for Last Rites, you might get a little heated. Although something tells me some in this group might be writing up plans to implement a new “fee structure” for just such a thing.
 
Well, since this thread is FIVE years old, I am guessing but “faith formation” usually refers to the ongoing Religious Education program - also called CCD, CCE, PSR, etc.

It isn’t, and can’t be free. The diocese requires that programs use only appoved material from approved publishers. Most diocese require that the teachers receive ongoing training. The classes are usually held inside buildings - not in public parks - so there is an expense for lights, heat, A/C, paint, plumbing, etc.

The question can’t be “is it free?” but rather, since there is a cost, who should pay?

There is no one-size-fits-all answer to that question since each parish and each diocese has different financial situations.
From your response it sounds like the TX diocese is becoming a big business (note that I haven’t experienced this in several other US dioceses that we have lived in over the past decade). So the diocese is requiring new books every year. Why oh why are they doing this? The Faith and Morals of our Church hasn’t changed since Christ’s Assumption into heaven. The deposit of faith ended with the death of St. John the apostle around 70 AD. There is no need to put new spins on the Faith. In the 60’s they taught out of one of the best and simple catechisms (one that I use every Sunday with my four kids) called the Baltimore Catechism. They used the same one every year so the parish didn’t have the expense of books. The people from that generation knew their Faith well. I, rather went thru all of the diocese preparation with all of the new books and didn’t learn my faith until I left catholic school and all of the regular catechism programs that they offered me and learned the Faith on my own (with better Texts like the Baltimore Catechism).

It appears that the publisher of these constantly changing books are really benefiting from the policy of CHANGE. What’s the purpose since the faith and morals didn’t change other than that someone is making some big $$$$$ here.

There is no need for supplies because the kids just need paper and a pen which they can get from Walmart for 99cents. The DRE at my parish keeps talking about “supply costs.” But I really doubt they are providing supplies because the teacher is the one who determines what he/she is going to be doing from day to day (at least that was my experience when I taught in this diocese) and brings his/her own supplies.

What is all this new training for? I taught for many years and never went to a single “training” class. Why add the extra expense burden in such a bad economy? Why doesn’t the diocese just have online training to make sure that the teacher is complying with certain guidelines? It would cost very little to do this especially if you get a parishioner to setup the website and maintain it.

As far as the cost to maintain the building, that is what tithing is for. If people aren’t paying enough when they tithe then you just make cuts. Like turn the air conditioner down a couple of degrees. I was freezing at mass today. I would never have the AC so high at home in our RV. The church has a HUGE cooling unit which likely is one of the biggest expenses for the parish. Why not bring in a few fans and turn the AC down 10 degrees? That is what I do in my RV. This would allow the parish to have extra money to pay off more of the huge loan they have on the multi-million dollar building complex that they built. Again, the biggest expense is paying the interest on the loan not the expense to buy brand new unnecessary catechism books every year. When you pay the loan off, you will need very little money from the parish to support the church and you could use the rest for the poor.

The one size fits all is from Christ when he gave one size fits all of his Body and Blood no matter whether you were rich or poor. And He gave it for free. He didn’t charge $75 for it, He didn’t charge $1,000 for it, though He could have sold it for a billion dollars per host. When you force someone to pay for a class to receive 1st communion, you’re forcing that person to pay for their 1st communion. The Universal Church has always condemned this practice regardless of how much the DRE’s want this extra pocket money. It’s just blood money as Judas found with his pieces of silver when he returned it to the high priests who wouldn’t even take it.
  • Tim
 
That would be a local rule to your diocese, not for the Church in general. The common term for a pastor here in the Archdiocese of Detroit is a 7 year assignment, and it is renewable as the bishop sees fit.
No priest would ever think that he is going to be at a parish long enough to be able to build his own personal chapel, though, right? I mean, he would have to live there until he dies, which in most cases isn’t going to happen (unless he dies early, of course … ).
So yes, depending on the diocese and the circumstances, it is quite possible for a priest to be at a parish for 15 years.
He would not know that he was going to be there that long ahead of time, though - and he would already know that he’s not going to be there until he dies, I should think - so I doubt that the parish is being asked to fund this priest’s own personal building project - whatever is being built, will remain with the parish even after he has been transferred somewhere else, and it is already the property of the Finance Council; not the priest’s personal property. (Nor could it be willed to his heirs, even if he dies there - it is parish property; not his personal property.)
 
OK, this seems to be a thread of actively interested parties…

The last time I checked, they pass the baskets around at every Sunday Mass.

According to the precept of the Church, everyone with the means, not everyone who “is moved to do so” is required to contribute to that collection, whether or not they do it at exactly that time. Is the Church requiring us to “pay for the sacraments” by making it a precept of the Church that the faithful are required to support the Church and its works, and that alms for the poor don’t count towards this?

I’ve never heard of a parish that will not waive the cost of sacramental preparation for those who say they cannot afford it. I have heard of bishops who waive sacramental preparation at the parish level for those children whose parents have demonstrated that their child does not need any additional instruction, but it was because the child didn’t need the preparation, not because the parents aren’t inclined to pay for it.

Parishes don’t have to be carrying around some large debt to come to the conclusion that parents with the obligation to see that their children are educated need to help shoulder some of the financial cost. I would not be surprised, in fact, if attendance is higher when there is a charge, since people value things more highly when there is a co-pay required, whether it is education, medical care, or reduced-cost legal help. If you don’t charge for it, the service is treated as if it is not worth anything. That seems to be human nature, or at least the nature of the humans in our society.
Here is a post on another thread that is pretty good from a priest who is a moderator:

gzh
New Member Join Date: November 15, 2009
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 30
Religion: CATHOLIC

Is paying for Sacraments allowed?

A Catholic Church, at which I am teaching CCD, has an overwelming population of Latinos and Filipinos who are in attendence. They are poor. The priests at this Church are charging a sum of $300 per child to attend. I think this is evil. The children have only once a week class, for only one hour. In return, they get a book, and me as a teacher. I am free. Why is this cost so outrageous? Now I have learned that these priests at this Church charge set fees: $200 per Baptism, $1000 per matrimony, and, as one teacher who teaches at the Catholic Church said to me, “They charge for all the Sacraments”…

Isn’t this like the old days pre reformation of ‘selling indulgences’??? Why is this happening? Is this common practice? What has happened to the Catholic Church now?

I am shocked and ashamed of these practices! gh

gzh
View Public Profile
Send a private message to gzh
Send email to gzh
Find all posts by gzh
Add gzh to Your Contacts

#2 May 4, '10, 3:16 pm
Fr. Vincent Serpa
Catholic Answers Apologist Join Date: May 4, 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,425

Re: paying for the Sacraments ???

Dear friend,

I’m shocked at such simony as well. I have never heard of children paying for religious instruction-let alone paying for sacraments.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church (#2121) states: “Simony is defined as the buying or selling of spiritual things.” Jesus said. “You received without pay, give without pay (Mt 10:8). “It is impossible to appropriate to oneself spiritual goods and behave toward them as their owner or master, for they have their source in God. One can receive them only from him, without payment.”

This is information that your bishop needs to know since the sacramental ministry in the diocese is his responsibility.

Fr. Vincent Serpa, O.P.

Additional recent answers by Fr. Vincent Serpa
 
The Universal Church has always condemned this practice regardless of how much the DRE’s want this extra pocket money. It’s just blood money as Judas found with his pieces of silver when he returned it to the high priests who wouldn’t even take it.
  • Tim
The DRE doesn’t receive this money at all - I don’t know why you have it in for the poor DRE - she is only following the instructions given to her by the priest, who is following the guidelines allowed by the Finance Council. (And by the way, it’s usually a woman because very few men would ever take such low wages for such a stressful job - she is not getting rich, or living the high life, as an employee of the parish.)

The Finance Council receives the money, and uses it to buy whatever supplies are needed for the program. The decision of what is required for the program is made at the Bishop’s office, usually by the Bishop himself.

I have never heard of any parish turning anyone away from any kind of classes, for lack of payment. Any parish I’ve been to, you can come to the first day, pick up your schedule and materials, skip the line for payment, and go straight to the meeting room for the “getting to know you” thing, and nobody would ever stop you or mention to you that you had “forgotten” to pay.
 
From your response it sounds like the TX diocese is becoming a big business (note that I haven’t experienced this in several other US dioceses that we have lived in over the past decade).
I don’t know how you got that from my post. No one in the diocese makes money off our CCE program.
So the diocese is requiring new books every year. Why oh why are they doing this?
No, the diocese is revising it’s text book list soon but it’s the first revision in over 15 years. The reason the diocese is putting out a new list is that the text book publishers have made revisions (at the USCCB’s insistence) to do a better job explaining concepts. We buy new workbooks every year and new texts are needed when they are damaged or when class size increases.
The Faith and Morals of our Church hasn’t changed since Christ’s Assumption into heaven.
Actually, the documents the Church uses to teach the faith have changed and expanded over the last 2000 years. Faith formation isn’t about memorizing the Catechism or faith facts. It’s teaching children how to apply the teaching in their daily lives. It’s the lives of our families that have changed so the application changes.
In the 60’s they taught out of one of the best and simple catechisms called the Baltimore Catechism. They used the same one every year so the parish didn’t have the expense of books.
I used the same one and our parish uses it for second grade. The book is now published as a paperback book so it doesn’t last many years. It’s so cheap and so useful, we give each FHC student two copies (one for the parents who may not have been catechised as well)
The people from that generation knew their Faith well.
Yes and no. They know the rules of the faith but this is the same generation that brought us moral relevatism. When it came to applying, there were weaknesses.
I, rather went thru all of the diocese preparation with all of the new books
Our parish uses the Faith and Life series which has Q&A just like the old BC but tied to the CCC. It’s a strong foundation.
It appears that the publisher of these constantly changing books are really benefiting from the policy of CHANGE.
That’s partially true. But we teach religious ed for grades PK - 11. The materials are very different for each age group. And even good books don’t last forever.
There is no need for supplies because the kids just need paper and a pen which they can get from Walmart for 99cents.
That works for older kids. The middle school grades use lots of white board markers and the littles use crayons and construction paper like crazy. 😃
But I really doubt they are providing supplies because the teacher is the one who determines what he/she is going to be doing from day to day and brings his/her own supplies.
When I taught the younger kids, I bought my own supplies too but not all teachers are able to do that. There are supplies for the program as a whole too such as copy paper, printer toner, computer programs. The diocese requires a lot of record keeping and we have a fairy transient population. As for day-to-day, our teacher manuals give a plan for the whole year and that doesn’t change much from year-to-year. It is fairly easy to predict which supplies a teacher will need.
What is all this new training for?
Don’t you want the teachers to be trained? Our catechist training is 18 months of theology and 10 classes in teaching different ages and learning styles. We have continuing education to keep teachers’ skills current and additional training for those teaching special groups such as kids with special education needs, adults, teens preparing for confirmation, girls preparing for quincinera, etc.
Why add the extra expense burden in such a bad economy?
The training isn’t new so it isn’t fair to compare it to the economy.
Why doesn’t the diocese just have online training to make sure that the teacher is complying with certain guidelines?
The diocese is moving to more onlline courses. But online is not as cheap as you think. The software development is expensvie and the parishes would need to upgrade their computers to make it work. Good idea but not an instant fix.
As far as the cost to maintain the building, that is what tithing is for. If people aren’t paying enough when they tithe then you just make cuts. Like turn the air conditioner down a couple of degrees.
Have you been to Texas lately? Today was day 21 over 100 degrees. We have our religious ed classes between Masses so we don’t even have to turn the A/C on M-Sat. But we are a very poor parish (with no mortgage, by the way). There’s only so much you can squeeze the budget. Whether the money comes from registrations or from the weekly collection, it’s still the same people paying.

Many of our CCE kids also come from families that don’t regularly attend Mass. How fair is it to ask senior citizens to put more in the collection to cover families who aren’t even there when the basket comes around?
I was freezing at mass today. Why not bring in a few fans and turn the AC down 10 degrees? That is what I do in my RV.
Not our experience.
This would allow the parish to have extra money . Again, the biggest expense is paying the interest on the loan not the expense to buy brand new unnecessary catechism books every year.
Our loan IS paid off. And we had no choice in the mortgage. Our original building had a fire. We are almost 20 years in the metal building that was supposed to be “temporary”.

I deleted the rest since it was more rant than an actual attempt to have a reasonable discussion on the topic.
 
Whether or not it is a sin to be in debt, it has nothing to do with the parish staff - even the priest can only work there for five years at maximum - it is the members of the parish - those who live in the neighborhood - who decide what loans to take out for their parish church, and what building projects they want to do. These things have absolutely nothing to do with the parish staff - they can only work with what they are given by the members of the parish who are on the Finance Council - that is to say, you and your fellow parishioners. It is your decision, as a person who lives in your parish boundaries, what debts your parish takes on, or not.

If you have chosen not to participate in the life of your parish, that is also not the fault of your parish staff members.

He cannot have even been there for “a decade and a half.” He is only allowed to be in the same parish for five years at maximum. He has obviously inherited his predecessor’s predecessor’s debt - if it was ever the priest’s debt to begin with.

I know lots of programs that are run entirely by volunteers - they typically are not very successful, because people’s day jobs get in the way.

For example, how are you supposed to go and visit the schools during school hours to talk to the children about the Sacraments, if you work from 9 to 5 to pay your bills, and can only meet the youth in the evenings? (But they have never seen you before, and their parents don’t know you, so they don’t come, because you never visit the schools … ) 🤷
FYI, in the US, most of the Dioceses have a 6 year term for Pastors, which can be renewed for another 6 years. And if for some reason the Bishop wants to extend that, he may–it can and does happen. The last parish I belonged to had a Pastor who was there for 17 years until he retired in 1990. The priest who was then appointed pastor in 1990 is still the Pastor. This parish was established in 1953 and has only had 3 Pastors!
 
So the diocese is requiring new books every year. Why oh why are they doing this?
There are different books for each year because the kids learn different things every year. Most have a different focus each year, the sacraments, the 10 commandments, OT history, etc.
There is no need for supplies because the kids just need paper and a pen which they can get from Walmart for 99cents. The DRE at my parish keeps talking about “supply costs.” But I really doubt they are providing supplies because the teacher is the one who determines what he/she is going to be doing from day to day (at least that was my experience when I taught in this diocese) and brings his/her own supplies.
My class uses quite a bit more than just paper and a pen, way more fun that way. All the classes are supplied with paper, pencils, crayons, glue sticks, scissors, basics like that. We also have a supply of things like construction paper, and various other craft supplies available for us to grab. As for other supplies, many bring their own, but our DRE is perfectly happy to get stuff for us if we request it. So yes, there are plenty of “other” supplies.

What is all this new training for? I taught for many years and never went to a single “training” class. Why add the extra expense burden in such a bad economy? Why doesn’t the diocese just have online training to make sure that the teacher is complying with certain guidelines? It would cost very little to do this especially if you get a parishioner to setup the website and maintain it.
So it is much better to send new volunteers into a class and hope they figure it out? Most of our catechists are not teachers so some help on things like classroom management seems like a good idea. And as for an online training, isn’t being part of the community of faith part of being Catholic. Trainings also give us the opportunity to support each other.
 
FYI, in the US, most of the Dioceses have a 6 year term for Pastors, which can be renewed for another 6 years. And if for some reason the Bishop wants to extend that, he may–it can and does happen. The last parish I belonged to had a Pastor who was there for 17 years until he retired in 1990. The priest who was then appointed pastor in 1990 is still the Pastor. This parish was established in 1953 and has only had 3 Pastors!
Point is, Pastor #1’s retirement home is probably a little apartment, with the rent paid for by the Diocese; not something he built at parish expense on parish property back when he was working there in 1953.
 
Exactly: that’s what the collection basket is for. How do children receiving First Communion get excluded from the rest of us who walk up to receive without a burden of paying directly for the sacrament?

Every single sacrament has costs. Tell me why this one is fine to charge for but the others are not?

As for sounding like I have a bone to pick about this issue, if someone suggested to you that we should charge parishioners for Last Rites, you might get a little heated. Although something tells me some in this group might be writing up plans to implement a new “fee structure” for just such a thing.
Honestly, I wouldn’t have a problem with it if religious education for the children were free, especially preparation for First Holy Communion. I suspect, however, that when it is free it is not attended better, but rather is attended more poorly, held in lower esteem, and contends with more of a sense of entitlement. Since it takes time, effort and materials to put on classes, it is arguably fair to charge for the classes. This is the structure people expect from a “real school.” It may be that parishes charge for preparation classes because more kids show up more regularly and are made to do their work more diligently when their parents are charged than when they aren’t. People are like that.

Last Rites, in contrast, comes at a time of life when it is unlikely that its value will be tied to what costs are incurred to provide it. It comes at a time of life when everything seems loss, when preparation comes not from one’s family, but from one’s pastor and from the totality of one’s life. It also comes at a time when it is not a matter of “is this candidate ready?” but rather “ready or not, here death comes!” So it is a horse of a different color, indeed.
 
I have never heard of children paying for religious instruction-let alone paying for sacraments.
I am rather surprised by this. My only guess is it is a regional thing. I did a quick survey of local parishes and all of them charged, somewhere between $30-$60. I would agree that $300 seems excessive, but I also don’t think that is even close to average.
 
I am rather surprised by this. My only guess is it is a regional thing. I did a quick survey of local parishes and all of them charged, somewhere between $30-$60. I would agree that $300 seems excessive, but I also don’t think that is even close to average.
I have lived in three states since my kids reached school age - two in the NE and now Texas. All the parishes charged for religious ed. My current parish is $25 and the highest I ever saw was $100. But that was for a summer concentrated program for students who were “too busy” to go to regular class during the school year.

$300 does sound steep but may or may not be excessive depending on what it covers.
 
Obviously the trend is to charge for religious education and require it for First Communion. (We didn’t pay for it on the West Coast.)

Just because it’s becoming more common doesn’t mean it’s right.

(It’s becoming trendy to teach children that there is not such thing as sin or hell, too.)

Since everyone has suspiciously ignored the response that the Catholic priest gave on the subject, I’ll re-paste it.

Dear friend,

I’m shocked at such simony as well. I have never heard of children paying for religious instruction-let alone paying for sacraments.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church (#2121) states: “Simony is defined as the buying or selling of spiritual things.” Jesus said. “You received without pay, give without pay (Mt 10:8). “It is impossible to appropriate to oneself spiritual goods and behave toward them as their owner or master, for they have their source in God. One can receive them only from him, without payment.”

This is information that your bishop needs to know since the sacramental ministry in the diocese is his responsibility.

Fr. Vincent Serpa, O.P.
 
Obviously the trend is to charge for religious education and require it for First Communion. (We didn’t pay for it on the West Coast.)

Just because it’s becoming more common doesn’t mean it’s right.

(It’s becoming trendy to teach children that there is not such thing as sin or hell, too.)

Since everyone has suspiciously ignored the response that the Catholic priest gave on the subject, I’ll re-paste it.

Dear friend,

I’m shocked at such simony as well. I have never heard of children paying for religious instruction-let alone paying for sacraments.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church (#2121) states: “Simony is defined as the buying or selling of spiritual things.” Jesus said. “You received without pay, give without pay (Mt 10:8). “It is impossible to appropriate to oneself spiritual goods and behave toward them as their owner or master, for they have their source in God. One can receive them only from him, without payment.”

This is information that your bishop needs to know since the sacramental ministry in the diocese is his responsibility.

Fr. Vincent Serpa, O.P.
He is surely referring to the amount ($300) and not the practice of the parents bearing any part of the cost of religious instruction. If you go to the website of the parish in the Archdiocese of Portland which is run by the Western Dominican Province (of which I believe Fr. Serpa is a member), you will find the book order form online, which includes

FIRST COMMUNION YEAR
Jesus Our Life (Revised) $10
New St Joseph 1st Communion $ 4
Catechism
*Special Sacramental Year Fee $ 15

These are reasonable fees reimbursing the parish for the actual costs of the program; the fees are similar for all the years of RE, excepting that the Sacramental year has special meetings, hence the special fee. Homeschooling parents who get permission to bypass the parish RE surely do not have to pay for books or activities their children are not in. Moreoer, I cannot imagine the friars don’t cover the cost for any children whose parents who can’t afford the books. These fees do not constitute simony. It is the exorbitant fees that go far beyond the actual cost to the parish or, if it does reflect actual cost, the exorbitant spending for preparation that goes far beyond the outlay reasonably required to accomplish the task.

PS The kids I helped to prepare for First Holy Communion heard about hell. We didn’t teach them to fear that God would not be merciful, but rather to fear that they would harden themselves in even one respect against holiness and happiness, against becoming what is necessary to be eternally happy with God. That, after all, is what unrepented mortal sin does.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top