I
IanGE
Guest
Sorry, senior moment! I meant “confession”.Actually, Communion was initiated at the Last Supper, centuries before Constantine. It was practiced and enjoyed by the early Christians from Pentecost on.
Sorry, senior moment! I meant “confession”.Actually, Communion was initiated at the Last Supper, centuries before Constantine. It was practiced and enjoyed by the early Christians from Pentecost on.
Catch 22: Jesus’ church is the body of all Christians, lay or clerical. Luther said, “if the clergy will not work with the Holy Spirit, then the Holy Spirit will work with the laity.” This was while he was a Catholic priest: the Charismatic renewal has demonstrably proved his words. Sadly, the hierarchy are STILL suspicious of the Holy Spirit. Why?Yes, this is very Catholic.
But Jesus the Head without a Body is merely a floating head with no way to communicate. The Church is the voice of Jesus. He speaks through His Body.
**SHEESH! Jesus rose from the dead: the Risen Christ is available to all who put their trust in HIM! And the signs of the believer WILL accompany those, too - a very positive confirmation. Paul says “I wish ALL of you could prophesy. Eagerly seek the higher gifts and do not forbid speaking in tongues.” At Charismatic prayer groups we regularly receive a prophecy, which is Lord communicating with His Children through a person who has given his mind, body, heart, head, voice, his/her ALL to Jesus.
The first time I prophesied it was as if my backside was on fire: I had to stand up on my hind legs and deliver a message to the group. My whole body shook, my heart thumped; blessedly my eldest brother (both blood and Charismatic) put his hand on my arm: “no wonder you feel like that, God has just spoken through you.” “SPOKEN THROUGH ME!” I trembled even more, but he added, "if God can speak through Balaam’s *, why not you?" Then the understanding Charismatic priest leading the music ministry started “Do not be afraid, for I have redeemed you. I have called you by your name: you are Mine!” at which I wept.
This, too, is very Catholic.
Amen!
And the Holy Spirit speaks through the Body of Christ: the Catholic Church.
Confession also existed centuries before Constantine, Ian. It, too, was instituted by Christ.Sorry, senior moment! I meant “confession”.
Amen!SHEESH! Jesus rose from the dead: the Risen Christ is available to all who put their trust in HIM! And the signs of the believer WILL accompany those, too - a very positive confirmation. Paul says “I wish ALL of you could prophesy. Eagerly seek the higher gifts and do not forbid speaking in tongues.”
At Charismatic prayer groups we regularly receive a prophecy, which is Lord communicating with His Children through a person who has given his mind, body, heart, head, voice, his/her ALL to Jesus.
Interesting. A non-sequitur, but interesting nonetheless.The first time I prophesied it was as if my backside was on fire: I had to stand up on my hind legs and deliver a message to the group. My whole body shook, my heart thumped; blessedly my eldest brother (both blood and Charismatic) put his hand on my arm: “no wonder you feel like that, God has just spoken through you.” “SPOKEN THROUGH ME!” I trembled even more, but he added, “if God can speak through Balaam’s ***, why not you?” Then the understanding Charismatic priest leading the music ministry started “Do not be afraid, for I have redeemed you. I have called you by your name: you are Mine!” at which I wept.
Very Catholic!Catch 22: Jesus’ church is the body of all Christians, lay or clerical. Luther said, “if the clergy will not work with the Holy Spirit, then the Holy Spirit will work with the laity.” This was while he was a Catholic priest:
Can you offer a quote from the hierarchy that demonstrates this suspicion of the Holy Spirit?the Charismatic renewal has demonstrably proved his words. Sadly, the hierarchy are STILL suspicious of the Holy Spirit. Why?
Very sad, indeed. :sad_yes:Some decades ago an English MP, Enoch Powell, was asked on a religious TV program, “do you believe in the Bible?”. He replied, “I am a member of the communion of the Church of England. If the Church of England tell me I must believe in the Bible, then I will do so.”
Q.2: “Do you believe in Jesus?”
A2. “I am a member of the communion… If they tell me to believe in Jesus, then I will.”
How terribly, terribly, terribly SAD!
Um…probably more than 3?How many Catholics would duck the issue the same way?
Beautiful!I call myself a Christian because I follow Jesus, the Christ, the Messiah, who reached down and picked up a sin-filled alcoholic from his self-soiled earth, stood him erect and gave him back his dignity, self-confidence, freedom, love, joy, peace, patience etc etc
Religion, Ian, can’t write anyone off. That is an anthropomorphism that is impossible, even theoretically.I speak of myself, when others, including religion, had written me off.
Yes. And, if you’re honest, you ought to acknowledge that without the Church you would not know what Jesus proclaimed.If I call myself a Catholic it would indicate that I follow the Catholic church and whatever it obliges me to do.
Fabulous!My Lord ASKED me to remain in the Catholic church and, along with other Charism-gifted Christians, testify to Him and the Holy Spirit.
Yes. And you know this because the Catholic Church proclaimed this for you.I’m also only too well aware that I cannot convert that’s the Holy Spirit’s job and even He will not trample over the most stubborn free-will
Yes. Another thing that you know because the Catholic Church proclaimed this for you.My job, I guess, is to sow, God makes it grow.
Yes. That’s what most folks do. I hear that from my fellow parishioners all the time who are lectors. And I know the priests and deacons do that as well.Whenever I read in Church I ask the Holy Spirit to take over my mouth and also to open the ears of the congregation.
Beautiful!I still tremble when I read Isaiah 6:9 &10:
“Go and tell this people: be ever hearing but never understanding,
be ever seeing but never perceiving.
Make the hearts of this people calloused, make their ears dull and close their eyes.
Otherwise they might see with their eyes, hear with their ears,
understand with their hearts, and turn and be healed”
Having the Holy Spirit take over when one lectors is not the distinct purview of Charismastics, Ian.I wish I could tell non-Charismatics that the Holy Spirit takes over my lips and larynx and opens the ears of the faithful. Charismatics come up and say, “my word, Ian, that was a Spirit-filled reading. Praise God!”
Brother Cal.Hello, my friends.
I’ll get back to responding to your remarks later. In the meantime, I came across 1 Corinthians during my daily Bible reading the other day and realized that it fits in with a point I was making here. I’ll quote the verses first, then make my point.
First Corinthians 13:1-3 (NAB):
If I speak with human tongues and angelic as well, but do not have love, I am a noisy gong, a clanging symbol. If I have the gift of prophecy and, with full knowledge, comprehend all mysteries, if I have faith great enough to move mountains, but have not love, I am nothing. If I give everything I have to feed the poor and hand over my body to be burned, but have not love, I gain nothing.
As you probably know, the love referred to here is the love of God (agape); not romantic, family, or friendship love; but the love found only in God through faith in Christ.
One could add to the verses above, “If I partake of the Eucharist 7 times a day, 7 days a week for 7 straight years, but have not love, it does me no good.”
That’s why I have been asking, “Does the Eucharist help your everyday walk with Christ?” JMCrea answered, in effect, “It does help me, at least in a subtle manner, in my daily walk with Christ.”
The Protestant Eucharist also helps me in a subtle way—perhaps more subtly than with you all—with my walk with Christ, even though I see the bread only as a representation of Christ’s body.
God bless . . . :coffeeread:
Sorry, senior moment! I meant “confession”.
Note though that the Sacraments in the early Church would have been celebrated in a different way, and done differently. Even marriage as we know it today didn’t come until much later in the Church, several centuries later. Although Christians do get married back then and this marriage was recognized by the Church, there was no elaborate Rite around it. In fact, evidence is people didn’t even get married in church. People get married as would be the custom of their time, and if they were Christians then they would have a Christian marriage. Simple as that.Confession also existed centuries before Constantine, Ian. It, too, was instituted by Christ.
Yes, perhaps. But the theology was the same.Note though that the Sacraments in the early Church would have been celebrated in a different way, and done differently.
No, the theology is the same.As for confession, again they do not have the “rules” we have today. They sought the counsel of their elders (the presbyters). They had the authority to forgive sins. The whole theology behind it is different than what we have today (in terms of details).
I fear for those the 800 years of BAD popes laid hands on. The dreaded Borgias; the two popes in Avignon and Rome etc. Some 2000 years of Holy Spirit inactivity: perhaps the Chrismatic RENEWAL is because Jesus and the Holy Spirit had to start all over again, this time not just the laying-on of hands, but Jesus reading the HEARTS of people mouthing words. Whatever, who or what is stopping the faithful from accepting the gifts of the Spirit (and the more painful FRUIT of the Spirit, which requires pruning. I said “Lord, it HURTS” He replied, “Ian, it’s called PRUNING!”
I am a septuagenarian, ex-computer designer/lecturer but simply don’t know the correct way to replyAmen!
BTW, Ian. Please do not nest your comments inside mine. There is a correct way to quote so that your quotes do not appear inside mine, necessitating your bolding it.
Interesting. A non-sequitur, but interesting nonetheless.
Very Catholic!
Can you offer a quote from the hierarchy that demonstrates this suspicion of the Holy Spirit?
No, it is not. I mean, it is not completely different, but it is sufficiently different than what we have today. For example, Confession isn’t a strict “if you do this then you must absolutely go to Confession prior to Communion” thing.Yes, perhaps. But the theology was the same.
No, the theology is the same.
A read of Eusebius’ History of the CHRISTIAN church, written about AD338-ish, reveals that there was NO formula for the forgiveness of sins. Christians believed sins (repented by the sinner - and that doesn’t just mean “sorry” but a whole change of lifestyle) were forgiven at baptism, at which the repentant one accepted Jesus AND His supreme sacrifice for the riddance of sin. People who sinned AFTER baptism were declared blasphemers that rejected Jesus. It wasn’t until two or three centuries later that someone spotted Jesus’ words (John 20:23): “whose sins you shall forgive they are forgiven, whose sins you shall not forgive they are not forgiven.” Note that Jesus said these words AFTER he breathed on the disciples and said “receive ye the Holy Spirit.” At first the church claimed this right to forgive for Bishops only. Only later still was “confession” conferred on all priests.As for confession, again they do not have the “rules” we have today. They sought the counsel of their elders (the presbyters). They had the authority to forgive sins. The whole theology behind it is different than what we have today (in terms of details).
Sorry, I still don’t know how to quote and reply separately!And you have the Church–the Catholic Church–to thank for this. For you would not know Jesus without the Church.
It was she who gave you the Bible. So you know that Jesus said certain things, and Paul said certain things and Peter said certain things…
Religion, Ian, can’t write anyone off. That is an anthropomorphism that is impossible, even theoretically.
Yes. And, if you’re honest, you ought to acknowledge that without the Church you would not know what Jesus proclaimed.
Yes. And you know this because the Catholic Church proclaimed this for you.
Yes. Another thing that you know because the Catholic Church proclaimed this for you.
And it was the Catholic Church who told you that these words from Isaiah are the Word of God, right?
Having the Holy Spirit take over when one lectors is not the distinct purview of Charismastics, Ian.
One would think that the Holy Spirit is not that narrow minded.
But the THEOLOGY is the same. Even Paul speaks of examining oneself before receiving the Eucharist. The Didache advises to confess one’s sins, as well. Assuredly, the more minute aspects of the theology were being developed (which sins were grave and required confession), but confession as an institution has been since the beginning.No, it is not. I mean, it is not completely different, but it is sufficiently different than what we have today. For example, Confession isn’t a strict “if you do this then you must absolutely go to Confession prior to Communion” thing.
“Confess your sins in church, and do not go up to your prayer with an evil conscience. This is the way of life. . . . On the Lord’s Day gather together, break bread, and give thanks, after confessing your transgressions so that your sacrifice may be pure” (Didache 4:14, 14:1 [A.D. 70]).A read of Eusebius’ History of the CHRISTIAN church, written about AD338-ish, reveals that there was NO formula for the forgiveness of sins. Christians believed sins (repented by the sinner - and that doesn’t just mean “sorry” but a whole change of lifestyle) were forgiven at baptism, at which the repentant one accepted Jesus AND His supreme sacrifice for the riddance of sin. People who sinned AFTER baptism were declared blasphemers that rejected Jesus. It wasn’t until two or three centuries later that someone spotted Jesus’ words (John 20:23): “whose sins you shall forgive they are forgiven, whose sins you shall not forgive they are not forgiven.” Note that Jesus said these words AFTER he breathed on the disciples and said “receive ye the Holy Spirit.” At first the church claimed this right to forgive for Bishops only. Only later still was “confession” conferred on all priests.
Every day at Mass, Catholics say "in the words that Jesus taught us, “Our Father, forgive us our trespasses AS we forgive those who trespass against us.” Jesus qualifies this with a terrifying warning in Matthew 6:14/15: “For if you forgive men when they sin against you, your Heavenly Father will also forgive you. But if you do not forgive men their sins, your Father will not forgive YOUR sins.” He speaks here to ME, to YOU, US. Passing the buck to a priest is not enough!
We are dead lucky Jesus simplified the sin thing. In the OT a sinner had to take a sacrifice to the temple; a turtle dove for a small sin, a perfect white bull for a biggie. The sinner laid hands on the sacrifice to transfer his sins to the animal. The priests then ATE the meat and took on board the sins of the people all year. One day of the year, Yom Kippur, all priests would lay hands on a perfect sacrifice, thereby transferring the tribal sins for the year onto the prize bull. This was then sacrificed and burnt on the altar table behind the holy of holies veil by the High Priest. God himself breathed in the smoke and fumes, thereby taking earthly sins from earth, completing the sin/forgiveness ritual.
There is also the lamb sent out into the wilderness bearing tribal sins, but I don’t know too much about that.
So the answer would be that you have no evidence but merely bearing false witness?I am a septuagenarian, ex-computer designer/lecturer but simply don’t know the correct way to reply
It is the ABSENCE of support for the Jesus/scriptural way to the Father and the Holy Spirit, ie "UNLESS you are Born Again you will not see/enter the Kingdom of God. This forum also radiates not just suspicion but rejection of God’s gifts and fruit to ALL in the ecclesia.
Just how did the Church keep you ignorant? Did you not attent Mass in those 45 years? If you were at Mass, did you not listen to the Liturgy of the Word? If you did, than how can you be ignorant of the Bible. Don’t blame the Church look into the mirror. What does your wife’s ignorant view have to do with it?For the first 45 years of my life the Church held me in thrall to Catechism, dogma and doctrine and kept me ignorant of the Bible, except children’s gospel stories, Mosaic miracles and Jonah in the whale. My Spanish Catholic wife believed it was sinful to read the Bible, until she was Born Again.
Check out these threads which explain it:I am a septuagenarian, ex-computer designer/lecturer but simply don’t know the correct way to reply![]()
Anyone who is Catholic is Born Again, Ian, when he is baptized.It is the ABSENCE of support for the Jesus/scriptural way to the Father and the Holy Spirit, ie "UNLESS you are Born Again you will not see/enter the Kingdom of God.
That’s a judgement call that’s above your pay grade I’m afraid. You don’t have the capacity to know who’s rejecting God’s gifts and who’s not.This forum also radiates not just suspicion but rejection of God’s gifts and fruit to ALL in the ecclesia.
The theology is the same. The application may be different.No, it is not. I mean, it is not completely different, but it is sufficiently different than what we have today. For example, Confession isn’t a strict “if you do this then you must absolutely go to Confession prior to Communion” thing.