I rarely disagree with you but whatās the point of an RCIA sponsor who canāt attend the sessions and be available for the person going through it?
Well, letās examine what, exactly RCIA is. RCIA is NOT āsessionsā. Catechesis group sessions are established as a convenient way to impart doctrinal topics to a group of people inquiring into the faith.
But never confuse catechetical sessions with RCIA. RCIA are rites that accompany a personās journey, which is a process.
The *process *of conversion certainly takes dialog with other Catholics, formation in living as a Catholic. The **community as a whole **assists with this via the sacramental and liturgical life of the community and evangelization and corporal/spiritual works of mercy it does.
A sponsor can walk a faith journey with their candidate or catechumen without ever going to āsessionsā.
If this family has one or two Catholics they call friends-- such as the husbandās work friend-- they can walk together through discussion, through sharing meals, through attending liturgy, through any number of things that donāt include āsessionsā.
If the sponsor can **also **attend the catechetical sessions with the catechumen or candidate, great.
But if they canāt that is NOT, NOT, NOT an impediment to them being a sponsor. Canon law outlines the requirements of a sponsor. āAttending RCIA meetingsā is not among them.
And, thereās no such thing as an āRCIA sponsorā really. The sponsor sponsors the candidate for baptism and/or confirmation. The sponsor has a role in the Rites, but in cases where a sponsor cannot be present at the rites (such as someone who lives out of town) a proxy can serve.
In the OPās case, she doesnāt know many/any Catholics. In more general cases, sometimes people do have Catholics in their lives-- an aunt, uncle, grandparent, friend, who may be local or may live somewhere else. They most certainly can (and IMHO should) be the sponsor even if they cannot attend meetings or rites. It would certainly be ideal if they could attend rites and Vigil. But in worst case scenario, a person can be a sponsor and have a proxy at the actual baptism/confirmation.
This happens ever day with infant baptisms and even with our teen confirmands-- a sponsor is selected who cannot attend the actual ceremony and life just goes on and a proxy stands in and there is no problem. But for some reason with RCIA catechumens and candidates, people get bent out of joint at the idea. I donāt know how the whole āassign a sponsorā who has to attend catechetical sessions got started, but it should not be the norm. The catechumen or candidate should select their sponsor from among Catholics they know. If they have trouble, then the community steps in and helps by offering people who have volunteered to be sponsors for candidates and catechumens who need them.
Iām well aware that when it comes to Baptism & Confirmation the choice of godparent/sponsor is up to the person receiving the sacrament, but RCIA sponsors are often appointed as needed from a team of volunteers. In the end these same volunteers may be chosen as godparent/sponsor, and often are, but not always.
Letās fine another term for these people. āRCIA sponsorā has no meaning, canonically.
As for requiring 7, thatās a bit much. I donāt doubt that the kids could have one for all of them but I do think the adults each need their own sponsor. I wouldnāt want to be the sponsor for a husband and wife at the same time. That would likely inhibit some of the conversations that should be happening.
If they find a couple of people they are comfortable with, great. If not, one certainly can be the sponsor of all.
She doesnāt have to have a sponsor right out of the gate. Meeting people in the parish during the inquiry process will help with choices. But, ultimately, a sponsor stands witness to the baptism and/or confirmation, must meet canonical requirements, and need not be all of these others things people try to make sponsors be.