SSPX letter indicates refusal of Vatican reconciliation effort

  • Thread starter Thread starter Boulder257
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
It just an internal communication between leaders, as summarized by a news agency. Even then it only says that certain elements of one draft of the preamble were unacceptable.

I think excluding Bishop Williamson is wise, and an obvious consequence for his behavior following the lifting of his excommunication. Also, I don’t know much about the SSPX superior, Bishop Fellay, but I was quite impressed by an interview he gave online, which put the whole organization in a better light for me.
 
This is not surprising. Every unification effort by the Church results in breakage in the reuniting group. Not all traditional Anglicans entered the ordinariate. When Eastern Churches went into union with Rome, not all did so and many remained Orthodox. It’s not surprising that there will be those in the SSPX who would not accept what the Church offers and their group will be split.
 
Time to move on… They are now just another protestant church. It pains me to have to say that:(
 
ConstantineTG said:
This is not surprising. Every unification effort by the Church results in breakage in the reuniting group. Not all traditional Anglicans entered the ordinariate. When Eastern Churches went into union with Rome, not all did so and many remained Orthodox. It’s not surprising that there will be those in the SSPX who would not accept what the Church offers and their group will be split.
Click to expand...
ITA.

Fellay probably realized that even if he came over a majority of the SPPX would not. Effectively diluting whatever a small group of SPPX could have done for the Church.

AC is a perfect example. It has sort of fizzled. Predictions of hundreds of thousands of converts have turned into a very disappointing 5000 or less. When push came to shove many of those professing to want to join the Ordinate backed out. Look at what happened to the Anglican church in Hollywood.
 
Melchior said:
Unless a miracle happens, I think it’s safe to say that His Grace Williamson won’t be coming back anytime soon.
Click to expand...
I am thinking that if SSPX returns Williamson will go schizmatic or even join the odd SSPV.
 
ringil said:
I am thinking that if SSPX returns Williamson will go schizmatic or even join the odd SSPV.
Click to expand...
Even if the all those within the SSPX reunite that does not mean any other bishop (or religious groups that are affiliated with them) besides Fellay will reunite. The other bishops have to enter into discussions with the Vatican on their own.
 
Friar_David_O.Carm said:
Even if the all those within the SSPX reunite that does not mean any other bishop (or religious groups that are affiliated with them) besides Fellay will reunite. The other bishops have to enter into discussions with the Vatican on their own.
Click to expand...
I didn’t know that. I thought Fellay is the superior of the SSPX, though I know superior isn’t the right word.

I knew they could reject his agreements but I thought that the “normative” course would be that if Fellay agrees- they agree.

I guess I was wrong.
 
ringil said:
I didn’t know that. I thought Fellay is the superior of the SSPX, though I know superior isn’t the right word.

I knew they could reject his agreements but I thought that the “normative” course would be that if Fellay agrees- they agree.

I guess I was wrong.
Click to expand...
Normally a religious institute has a superior but that superior is not a bishop. The SSPX some how worked out that they have bishops. Bishop Fellay is the head, the others are just members. . .

. . . but bishops can not be members of a religious institute because of the obedience issue.

I believe that a letter was leaked that said that the SSPX talks only included the non-bishop members and bishop Fellay as the superior, the other bishops would have to enter into their own talks with the Vatican if they want to reunite.
 
Friar_David_O.Carm said:
Normally a religious institute has a superior but that superior is not a bishop. The SSPX some how worked out that they have bishops. Bishop Fellay is the head, the others are just members. . .

. . . but bishops can not be members of a religious institute because of the obedience issue.

I believe that a letter was leaked that said that the SSPX talks only included the non-bishop members and bishop Fellay as the superior, the other bishops would have to enter into their own talks with the Vatican if they want to reunite.
Click to expand...
That’s different and adds a lot of complexities to this process.

If Fellay agrees I would hope that the others just agree as well.

I suspect Williamson will just do his own thing. Probably better that way in my book.
 
GRATEFULONEjim said:
Time to move on… They are now just another protestant church. It pains me to have to say that:(
Click to expand...
Br. JR mentioned something similar starting at about this post:
JReducation said:
Secondly, we must pay attention to the subtle words that have been used. The Apostolic See told the SSPX that if it refused the Preamble, it would lead to schism and laid the moral responsibility on the shoulders of Bishop Fellay.

They’re won’t go into schism because they walk. They will go into schism, because the pope can jettison them out. There are two ways of going into schism. The second is rarely used, but has been used. The way that it’s done is that the faithful are told that if they support this group, they too are in schism and may not receive the sacraments from the Catholic Church until they reconcile with the Church’s authorities.
Click to expand...
The SSPX has been given a bazillion chances by the Pope and time and again they rebuff the efforts.

The SSPX seems to enjoy the ambiguous situation they’re in now, but the Vatican is tired of it and wants one or the other (and it’s not a hard question): Are you in or are you out? The SSPX keeps wanting to say yes (“we’re Catholic”) and no (“we don’t agree with certain things”).

I’d prefer them to come in (I’d prefer everyone to come into the Church), but we can’t force them. If they don’t want to come in, then by definition they’re out.
 
curlycool89 said:
Br. JR mentioned something similar starting at about this post:

The SSPX has been given a bazillion chances by the Pope and time and again they rebuff the efforts.

The SSPX seems to enjoy the ambiguous situation they’re in now, but the Vatican is tired of it and wants one or the other (and it’s not a hard question): Are you in or are you out? The SSPX keeps wanting to say yes (“we’re Catholic”) and no (“we don’t agree with certain things”).

I’d prefer them to come in (I’d prefer everyone to come into the Church), but we can’t force them. If they don’t want to come in, then by definition they’re out.
Click to expand...
I agree.
 
I am honestly starting to get angry with the SSPX. The Vatican has been more than generous in trying to reconcile with them but yet they keep being stubborn about it. All well, I guess all one can do is pray for the SSPX and the Vatican that they would reconcile.
 
GRATEFULONEjim said:
Time to move on… They are now just another protestant church. It pains me to have to say that:(
Click to expand...
Neither point is really true. This article is nothing but speculation over a leaked memo about disagreement over one draft of the preamble out of many. No decision has yet been made. Just more squabbling. Even if they entered schism, they would still be Catholic, and still be priests. They would be a schismatic catholic church, not a protestant church.
 
Archbishop Di Noia’s remarkable comments about the Society of St. Pius X and modern Judaism. He says, "After three years of dialogue [the doctrinal discussions] we still need to understand what the SSPX position is on the Jewish Community and Judaism. ”?
The SSPX position is nothing more than the traditional teaching of the Catholic Church throughout the ages, that all non-Catholics, Jews included, must convert to the Catholic Church for salvation. There is no salvation outside the Church. This should not be a difficult concept for a Catholic. Archbishop Di Noia openly admits that the purpose of the Vatican’s discussions with the SSPX, and its work for so-called "regularization” is to convert the SSPX to Conciliar thinking. "This is a new concept which we know the Traditionalists will not be able to accept immediately. Convincing them will take time, and in this respect we will have to be patient.” Thank you Archbishop DiNoia. To be forewarned is to be forearmed.
"If you do not believe that I am He [the Messiah], you will die in your sins.” (John 8:24)
"Who is the liar but he who denies that Jesus is the Christ. He is Antichrist "(1 John 2: 22)
Today’s post-Concliar Vatican is no doubt embarrassed by Saint John.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top