SSPX Teaching Video

  • Thread starter Thread starter PrayforMallory
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I know he mentions something about the “binding authority” of Vat. II in SP.

Is there another source for this? Thanks.

Also, what about the arguments that Vat II was a fallible “pastoral” council and not an infallible ecumenical council. Is there any weight to these arguments? Piouswoman, I’d like to hear from you and others also.
If you can get a hold of his talks that he gave in the USA on ecumenism, he refers to Vatican II as authoritative many times, in Washington and in New York.

He constantly refers to the Second Vatican Council in his writings. Check them out. I believe that EWTN and CAF have his writing in their libraries.

JR 🙂
 
Actually, there are doubts that the Cardinal realized what he was signing in that case. He was quite elderly and practically blind.
If he were allowed to sign something that he didn’t know what he was signing, that would have been fraud and I highly doubt that someone as holy as Paul VI would have allowed such nonsense.

JR 🙂
 
I’m extremely sdorry to hear of the stressors you suffered in the midst of changes at your parish church, post-Vatican II. It sounds like it could be very shattering for a child. Your exposure has not been my exposure, thanks be to God, and right now I attend Mass (belong to a parish) that is 100 years old; the church from 100 years ago is the church where we worship. I should add that the churches of my childhood and young-adult years were only reconstructed if they were beaten and battered by Midwestern weather. Many of our older churches (100+ yrs) are still standing, still in use, and the Masses offered are always quite reverent. (As for the Rosary falling into obscurity, of course it didn’t or we wouldn’t have it still.)

I’m very sorry especially that you choose to blame your parents since you will never experience their lives or times and passing judgment on them is a very dangerous choice. They did their best to raise you Catholic and you ARE Catholic. Our oldest laws (the Ten Commandments) command us to honor our parents. One can’t claim “exception” in that regard.
But the fact of the matter is Catharina…I DO NOT BLAME my parents, and if you reread what I wrote, you will see that I said they were included amongst the “worst offenders” of all, but nowhere did I lay blame on them. So, spare the lecture please. I do not blame anyone for the time in history that I have been born. The reminder to me about the commandment to honor our parents is not only out of line, but really quite stupid as you do not know me nor do you know anything about me.
 
But the fact of the matter is Catharina…I DO NOT BLAME my parents, and if you reread what I wrote, you will see that I said they were included amongst the “worst offenders” of all, but nowhere did I lay blame on them. So, spare the lecture please. I do not blame anyone for the time in history that I have been born. The reminder to me about the commandment to honor our parents is not only out of line, but really quite stupid as you do not know me nor do you know anything about me.
You said: "**I am sick to death of those who think that everything is hunky dory…the worst, and

I mean the WORST offenders of all, are the older people, my parents age and my parents included, who never stood up to the devil’s assault on the church

and to this day follow blindly along and refuse to hear the truth**…"

and that’s NOT judgmental and that’s not blame?

Sure.
 
You said: "**I am sick to death of those who think that everything is hunky dory…the worst, and

I mean the WORST offenders of all, are the older people, my parents age and my parents included, who never stood up to the devil’s assault on the church**

and to this day follow blindly along and refuse to hear the truth…"

and that’s NOT jufgmental and that’s not blame?

Sure.
Here is a little lesson for you catharina…
when I say “AND I BLAME MY PARENTS” then you have a leg to stand on…until then, please refrain from putting words into my mouth. Is that very Catholic of you, after all? I don’t think so. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
 
Actually, there are doubts that the Cardinal realized what he was signing in that case. He was quite elderly and practically blind.
The later document was given two months later. While there are diseases that can affect someone that quickly, I have not come across any reason to believe that the Cardinal was not in full control of his faculties. If he were not, then what is called into question for me is not the authenticity of the later document of his, but the former as the time between the two is so small.
 
You said: "**I am sick to death of those who think that everything is hunky dory…the worst, and

I mean the WORST offenders of all, are the older people, my parents age and my parents included, who never stood up to the devil’s assault on the church**

and to this day follow blindly along and refuse to hear the truth…"

and that’s NOT judgmental and that’s not blame?

Sure.
As an aside…since you FALSELY presented my words as above, for the record, this is how they actually appeared:

It is an absolute joke, and I am sick to death of those who think that everything is hunky dory…the worst, and I mean the WORST offenders of all, are the older people, my parents age and my parents included, who never stood up to the devil’s assault on the church and to this day follow blindly along and refuse to hear the truth…

Thank you in advance for REFRAINING from taking the words that I have written and rearranging, highlighting, underscoring and bolding them to suit your agenda…
 
I can **validate **that Our Lady was put on the back burner. Throughout my grade school and high school years, never was emphasis or so much as serious mention given to me by any of my religion teachers on the importance of Our Lady, the rosary fell into obscurity when I was in grade school….I have lived through the changes, I still remember the complete and total annihilation of the Holy Mass…I remember the nuns suddenly appearing at school in short skirts and little veils that flew out behind them when they walked, and shortly thereafter disappeared entirely, I remember the quite sudden wreckovation of our beautiful old mission style church that was replaced by an odious and modern monstrosity that still stands today, with an “altar” (read table) that looks like Fred Flintstones dining room table, I remember the sickeningly trendy guitar masses, the big deal when we suddenly could go to the Saturday afternoon “golf Mass” and it counted for Sunday, the overwhelming force of modernistic priests instructing us to take Holy Communion in the hand, the sale of a beautiful pipe organ that had been installed in the choir loft of the new monstrosity but had rarely been used…they quickly sold it and replaced it with a cheap organ in the front right of the church, and a small grand piano to boot, the lie to the parishioners that the votive stand had to go because the fire insurance wouldn’t cover it, the removal of the baptismal fount in a special alcove off of the vestibule to the front left of the church, and well, I could go on and on…not to mention the zero Catholic education that I received going to “Catholic” schools all of my youth. It is an absolute joke, and I am sick to death of those who think that everything is hunky dory…the worst, and I mean the WORST offenders of all, are the older people, my parents age and my parents included, who never stood up to the devil’s assault on the church and to this day follow blindly along and refuse to hear the truth…yes, the modernists infiltrated the church LONG before Vatican II, they indoctrinated the laity with the false notion that you do what the pope says regardless of whether it is Catholic or not, you blindly obey, you accept error, and deprived of the truths, that is exactly what happened. Well, I’ll be darned if I’m going to sit around with stars in my eyes over the current papacy and the current state of the church, I’ll be darned if I’m going to sit idly by and follow error like some sort of dumb lamb. You know what they have neglected to instruct us all of these years? That it is THE DUTY of a Catholic to KNOW his faith, and to REJECT ERROR.
I am sorry if this truly was your experience, but in my short 24 years, I have not had any experience remotely similar to this. Growing up, going to Catholic school, being something of a deaconate brat, I was raised with Mary being the most important woman in my life. In Catholic school, the month of October was always dedicated to learning about the Rosary, and this was done with little diagrams showing how to pray it, the various prayers, and a brief history. May was always the May crowning. I remember in 4th grade spending time learning about the dispute over Mary as the Mother of Christ vs Mother of God. In 5th grade, we learned the Angelus and recited it daily. In first and second, learning about Fatima and Lourdes, the Immaculate Conception, and the need to say the Rosary daily to prevent souls from falling into hell. That was my upbringing.

Respectfully, I ask that you do not refer to Altars as tables. A table is something for a supper, whereas the Altar is where Christ’s Sacrifice is offered for our sins. Also, the Saturday Vigil Masses predate the Second Vatican Council, installed by Pope Pius XII, based on the tradition associated with the Easter Vigil.
 
I did have some very feminist “nuns” that ran around, but I also had some pious nuns that taught us very well. I remember at my First Penance, we had to learn the Act of Contrition within two weeks time. We were only allowed to shake hands with one person at the Sign of Peace. We were taught that there are two types of sins, mortal and venial, and while we aren’t required to confess venial, we should do so anyway because it was good for us. Honestly, we were taught to focus on Mary, because we were taught that, as seen at the Wedding at Cana, that Jesus will not turn His mother down; but that we were also taught that what we think is good for us isn’t always what God thinks. While I hope and pray that SSPX claims its rightful place within full Communion, I cannot condemn the Catholic training that I have had in my life, as I see nothing in it that is different from that prior to the Council. And for me, the arguments that the Church changed lose out.
 
I am sorry if this truly was your experience, but in my short 24 years, I have not had any experience remotely similar to this. Growing up, going to Catholic school, being something of a deaconate brat, I was raised with Mary being the most important woman in my life. In Catholic school, the month of October was always dedicated to learning about the Rosary, and this was done with little diagrams showing how to pray it, the various prayers, and a brief history. May was always the May crowning. I remember in 4th grade spending time learning about the dispute over Mary as the Mother of Christ vs Mother of God. In 5th grade, we learned the Angelus and recited it daily. In first and second, learning about Fatima and Lourdes, the Immaculate Conception, and the need to say the Rosary daily to prevent souls from falling into hell. That was my upbringing.

Respectfully, I ask that you do not refer to Altars as tables. A table is something for a supper, whereas the Altar is where Christ’s Sacrifice is offered for our sins. Also, the Saturday Vigil Masses predate the Second Vatican Council, installed by Pope Pius XII, based on the tradition associated with the Easter Vigil.
This was TRULY my experience. Why would I lie? I learned the Angelus too, two years ago that is, when I made the change to tradition. I am inspired by your upbringing…it was not there for me as a child, as a young adult, as a young married woman. I had to find my way back to the church and then to tradition, after many years of wondering what didn’t seem right about it all. I am sorry for your unbelief in what is reality for me and countless others. I saw more people leave the church, more families break apart, most of my friends and peers drift away from the church and morality than I care to think about. I am a product of my era, I can vouch for what happened, I experienced it first hand…and members of my family and all of my siblings, save one, are living examples of it all.

The modernists wanted to call it a meal, they wanted to appeal to the Protestants, they wanted us to forget that it is a sacrifice, they replaced the altars with tables…they accomplished all that they wanted. Please don’t deny facts, and don’t request me to deny facts, either.
 
As an aside…since you FALSELY presented my words as above, for the record, this is how they actually appeared:

It is an absolute joke, and I am sick to death of those who think that everything is hunky dory…the worst, and I mean the WORST offenders of all, are the older people, my parents age and my parents included, who never stood up to the devil’s assault on the church and to this day follow blindly along and refuse to hear the truth…

Thank you in advance for REFRAINING from taking the words that I have written and rearranging, highlighting, underscoring and bolding them to suit your agenda…
I didn’t change a single word and I didn’t change the sequence.
Every day I find I feel much sorrier for you.

If you are saying I misunderstood your words - then say that.
 
I did have some very feminist “nuns” that ran around, but I also had some pious nuns that taught us very well. I remember at my First Penance, we had to learn the Act of Contrition within two weeks time. We were only allowed to shake hands with one person at the Sign of Peace. We were taught that there are two types of sins, mortal and venial, and while we aren’t required to confess venial, we should do so anyway because it was good for us. Honestly, we were taught to focus on Mary, because we were taught that, as seen at the Wedding at Cana, that Jesus will not turn His mother down; but that we were also taught that what we think is good for us isn’t always what God thinks. While I hope and pray that SSPX claims its rightful place within full Communion, I cannot condemn the Catholic training that I have had in my life, as I see nothing in it that is different from that prior to the Council. And for me, the arguments that the Church changed lose out.
Beautiful post - and your education sounds similar to my own - though forty years apart.
 
This was TRULY my experience. Why would I lie? I learned the Angelus too, two years ago that is, when I made the change to tradition. I am inspired by your upbringing…it was not there for me as a child, as a young adult, as a young married woman. I had to find my way back to the church and then to tradition, after many years of wondering what didn’t seem right about it all. I am sorry for your unbelief in what is reality for me and countless others. I saw more people leave the church, more families break apart, most of my friends and peers drift away from the church and morality than I care to think about. I am a product of my era, I can vouch for what happened, I experienced it first hand…and members of my family and all of my siblings, save one, are living examples of it all.

The modernists wanted to call it a meal, they wanted to appeal to the Protestants, they wanted us to forget that it is a sacrifice, they replaced the altars with tables…they accomplished all that they wanted. Please don’t deny facts, and don’t request me to deny facts, either.
I’m not asking you to deny anything. I won’t deny that it was a tumultuous time…if I spelt that word right. I don’t mean to sound bratty, but my experience has been that much of this is the baby-boomer generation, rebelling for the sake of rebelling. There are many people my age, and younger (a lot more younger) who are not like this at all. Watch out for the Priests in their 20’s and 30’s as I find that they’re fairly no-non-sense. It’s not very obvious right now, but there are a lot of people in my generation who are fed up with the way that the older generation has watered down things and want a genuine application of the Second Vatican Council, which we see in Benedict XVI. Even the Pope says that we’re only NOW getting into the actual application of the Council as much that happened prior was people ignoring the faith. I am sorry for your experience, I really am, and I know that experiences like this were rampent at one time, but this is not the Council nor the Magesterium.
 
I’m not asking you to deny anything. I won’t deny that it was a tumultuous time…if I spelt that word right. I don’t mean to sound bratty, but my experience has been that much of this is the baby-boomer generation, rebelling for the sake of rebelling. There are many people my age, and younger (a lot more younger) who are not like this at all. Watch out for the Priests in their 20’s and 30’s as I find that they’re fairly no-non-sense. It’s not very obvious right now, but there are a lot of people in my generation who are fed up with the way that the older generation has watered down things and want a genuine application of the Second Vatican Council, which we see in Benedict XVI. Even the Pope says that we’re only NOW getting into the actual application of the Council as much that happened prior was people ignoring the faith. I am sorry for your experience, I really am, and I know that experiences like this were rampent at one time, but this is not the Council nor the Magesterium.
You are absolutely right in saying that much of it can be attributed to the baby boomer generation. However, that is just the tip of the iceberg. Really, it is as I have said, that the problems began long before Vatican II. In reality, they began with the French Revolution. Modernism only culminated with Vatican II, it had been undercover and at work in the church for years. That is why I have stated that my very own parents, and even grandparents, were already being changed by the attitudes of the churchmen and the acceptance of the modern errors, the letting down of their guard, and the pressure of the times.

I am happy to hear that the younger generations are fed up with the baby boomer generation, I have been fed up with them since day one and the truth is that the hope of the church is in the young.

I must disagree with your rosy outlook on the Council however, it was a bad Council, and it should be swept into the dust bin of history. While Pope Benedict has done some good, his mind and his understanding is* modern*, and hence, he is trying to reconcile the bad and failed council with tradition…he is attempting, in my opinion to blend the two rites, and he simply cannot let go of his “baby” Vatican II. Since there is a trend that the younger generations are fed up with the older…then it follows that they should be fed up with the progressive, modern thinkers from Vatican II…of which our pope is one.
 
I didn’t change a single word and I didn’t change the sequence.
Every day I find I feel much sorrier for you.

If you are saying I misunderstood your words - then say that.
Don’t bother feeling sorry for me, catharina. You misunderstood my words.
 
Don’t bother feeling sorry for me, catharina. You misunderstood my words.
Thank you for saying that you realize I misunderstood your words.

Having been Catholic fo 62 years, with a love of God and the Church and the Eucharist that only grows and grows and grows, I know that I can easily over-react when someone dumps a load of wrath on the Church. It’s as if he/she has attacked my family - because he/she has…
 
Thank you for saying that you realize I misunderstood your words.

Having been Catholic fo 62 years, with a love of God and the Church and the Eucharist that only grows and grows and grows, I know that I can easily over-react when someone dumps a load of wrath on the Church. It’s as if he/she has attacked my family - because he/she has…
No problem.

I also have a love of Holy Mother Church. That is why when I see things that are not in accordance with tradition, I too get angry, and it was not Holy Mother Church that caused the devastation of the last forty years, it was only men that did so. We see things through different glasses.
 
As an aside…since you FALSELY presented my words as above, for the record, this is how they actually appeared:

It is an absolute joke, and I am sick to death of those who think that everything is hunky dory…the worst, and I mean the WORST offenders of all, are the older people, my parents age and my parents included, who never stood up to the devil’s assault on the church and to this day follow blindly along and refuse to hear the truth…

Thank you in advance for REFRAINING from taking the words that I have written and rearranging, highlighting, underscoring and bolding them to suit your agenda…
You don’t have to justify yourself. This is the Internet, and this discussion was intended to be about ideas, not individuals.

I have to be honest. It seems like, and I reiterate seems like, the anti-SSPX folks think it’s ok to resort to ad hominem attacks. I know the pro-SSPX folks are guilty of it to, but all these accusations of “judging,” and saying that people lack charity, those are irrelevant to the discussion at hand, which is the merits/demerits of the content of this video, which some people have discussed, both for and against.

There’s a big difference in judging someone’s ideas and in judging that person. If this weren’t the case, we’d all be guilty of being pharisees when we refute Richard Dawkins.

With that said, nobody on here is anyone else’s parish priest, so, you know.
 
I did have some very feminist “nuns” that ran around, but I also had some pious nuns that taught us very well. I remember at my First Penance, we had to learn the Act of Contrition within two weeks time. We were only allowed to shake hands with one person at the Sign of Peace. We were taught that there are two types of sins, mortal and venial, and while we aren’t required to confess venial, we should do so anyway because it was good for us. Honestly, we were taught to focus on Mary, because we were taught that, as seen at the Wedding at Cana, that Jesus will not turn His mother down; but that we were also taught that what we think is good for us isn’t always what God thinks. While I hope and pray that SSPX claims its rightful place within full Communion, I cannot condemn the Catholic training that I have had in my life, as I see nothing in it that is different from that prior to the Council. And for me, the arguments that the Church changed lose out.
I hope you won’t mind, then, replying to my threads in the future. There are things about Vatican II that I don’t understand (that doesn’t equal disagreement).
 
This was TRULY my experience. Why would I lie? I learned the Angelus too, two years ago that is, when I made the change to tradition. I am inspired by your upbringing…it was not there for me as a child, as a young adult, as a young married woman. I had to find my way back to the church and then to tradition, after many years of wondering what didn’t seem right about it all. I am sorry for your unbelief in what is reality for me and countless others. I saw more people leave the church, more families break apart, most of my friends and peers drift away from the church and morality than I care to think about. I am a product of my era, I can vouch for what happened, I experienced it first hand…and members of my family and all of my siblings, save one, are living examples of it all.

The modernists wanted to call it a meal, they wanted to appeal to the Protestants, they wanted us to forget that it is a sacrifice, they replaced the altars with tables…they accomplished all that they wanted. Please don’t deny facts, and don’t request me to deny facts, either.
Unfortunately for myself, my experience with the Church largely mirrors yours in some aspects.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top