The one has little to do with the other. The canonical status of the the SSPX is one thing, but the missal is according to the 1962 editio typica which is what is called for by the terms of Summorum Pontificum. If someone wants to acquire the Angelus Press edition, I really don’t see a problem.… but the SSPX is not and that is good enough reason not to use the Angelus Press which is in conjunction with the SSPX.
money from Angelus Press goes to support the SSPX which is not in communion with Rome, that is what the problem I have with it. I don’t want my money going to something that is supporting something that isn’t in communion with RomeThe one has little to do with the other. The canonical status of the the SSPX is one thing, but the missal is according to the 1962 editio typica which is what is called for by the terms of Summorum Pontificum. If someone wants to acquire the Angelus Press edition, I really don’t see a problem.
Plus the Baronius Press has Summorum Pontificum included in their edition as well as the imprimatur. See no reason that one shouldn’t own a Baronius Press missal or even earlier than 62
Both Angelus Press and Baronius Press are for-profit entities. (If Angelus shares part of its revenue with the SSPX that’s fine, and only means that it’s somewhat less for-profit.) To me, it’s simply a matter of which edition a person prefers.money from Angelus Press goes to support the SSPX which is not in communion with Rome, that is what the problem I have with it. I don’t want my money going to something that is supporting something that isn’t in communion with Rome
I still perfer my 1945 Fr. Lasance over anythingBoth Angelus Press and Baronius Press are for-profit entities. (If Angelus shares part of its revenue with the SSPX that’s fine, and only means that it’s somewhat less for-profit.) To me, it’s simply a matter of which edition a person prefers.
Anyway, if I had my choice, it’d be neither. The St Andrew’s beats all the competition hands-down.