J
James0235
Guest
I believe the figure typically recited is actually 70%.She also told me that Vatican II took out 1/3 of the prayers from the Mass…
If that is your criteria for better (and I’m not saying that it should be) then the Extraordinary Form of the Mass would actually be better.It seems to me, so far, that the NO mass is better because we have new OT readings, NT readings, Psalm, and Gospel every week.
While there is no set Old Testament Reading (with some exceptions) you will hear much, much more Scripture (including from the Old Testament) in the EF than in the OF.
In addition to the Epistle (typically but not always a New Testament Reading), the Gradual (a Psalm), and the Gospel there is the Introit ( a Psalm and a selection from Scripture). And then there are the Offertory and the and the Communion Verses (both from Scripture). And each Mass ends with the Last Gospel (from John 1)
And the prayers of the EF itself are more often drawn directly from Scripture itself than in the OF.
While the Extraordinary Form contains much more Scripture than the Ordinary Form, the Ordinary Form contains a much greater variety of Scripture than the Extraordinary Form.
3 year cycle of Sunday Readings. 2 year cycle of weekday Readings. And there are often options as to which readings to use.
James