Y
yppop
Guest
Gentlemen;
In post 985, belorg wrote:“If G does not becaome G+U, then, unless U can pop into existence, from nothing ( thus violating ex nihilo nihil comes) there can never be a U.”
It is futile to discuss anything with belorg on any level approaching common sense, rationality, reason, or witticism. His mind apparently has been fossilized by the a single maxim: ex nihilo nihil fit, nothing comes from nothing.
However I understand his stubborn defense of the maxim since he is a living example of the truth of nothing coming from nothing. He has been mentally entrapped by the word “nothing” and doesn’t appear to have the wherewithal to understand that word’s delightful ambiguities. As a result his argument will stop at nothing.
Since he seems to know a lot about nothing, perhaps he would explain how it is that if nothing comes from nothing then:
If nothing comes from nothing then nothing exists? and yet nothing is further from the truth
A poor man has nothing; a rich man wants for nothing; does a rich man need what the poor man has?
If you eat nothing long enough it will kill you.
Nothing is better than a dry martini; and yet martinis are better than nothing
Nothing is impossible for God; and yet nothing is easy for the simplest dolt.
nothing is evil; nothing is perfect; nothing lasts forever, etc., etc., etc.
I managed to rid myself of sir belorg with the accusation that he is a compulsive obsessive that must get the last word. The irony of my approach is that in my several discussions with him in this thread, it seems I got the last word and for a few moments I was fooled into thinking that perhaps belorg was sharp enough to realize that and had subtly turned the tables on me. That thought disappeared quickly when I realized that the reason I got the last word was he didn’t have a response. As evidence I submit that belorg failed to respond to my posts: 359, 418, 562, 651, 686, 822, 894.
Yppop
In post 985, belorg wrote:“If G does not becaome G+U, then, unless U can pop into existence, from nothing ( thus violating ex nihilo nihil comes) there can never be a U.”
It is futile to discuss anything with belorg on any level approaching common sense, rationality, reason, or witticism. His mind apparently has been fossilized by the a single maxim: ex nihilo nihil fit, nothing comes from nothing.
However I understand his stubborn defense of the maxim since he is a living example of the truth of nothing coming from nothing. He has been mentally entrapped by the word “nothing” and doesn’t appear to have the wherewithal to understand that word’s delightful ambiguities. As a result his argument will stop at nothing.
Since he seems to know a lot about nothing, perhaps he would explain how it is that if nothing comes from nothing then:
If nothing comes from nothing then nothing exists? and yet nothing is further from the truth
A poor man has nothing; a rich man wants for nothing; does a rich man need what the poor man has?
If you eat nothing long enough it will kill you.
Nothing is better than a dry martini; and yet martinis are better than nothing
Nothing is impossible for God; and yet nothing is easy for the simplest dolt.
nothing is evil; nothing is perfect; nothing lasts forever, etc., etc., etc.
I managed to rid myself of sir belorg with the accusation that he is a compulsive obsessive that must get the last word. The irony of my approach is that in my several discussions with him in this thread, it seems I got the last word and for a few moments I was fooled into thinking that perhaps belorg was sharp enough to realize that and had subtly turned the tables on me. That thought disappeared quickly when I realized that the reason I got the last word was he didn’t have a response. As evidence I submit that belorg failed to respond to my posts: 359, 418, 562, 651, 686, 822, 894.
Yppop