State religion

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pugsly
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Roscoe

**You are making the argument that Prayer should be a requirement in Public Schools by trying to link it to the founding fathers. I’m pointing out that yes some were Christians, others held other views. It wasn’t universal. **

There is no inconsistency here. I and no one else has said prayers should be to Jesus. God is worshiped by all religions. As Franklin pointed out at the Constitutional Assembly, and the others agreed, there should be prayer to God before each daily session of the Assembly. What was good enough for the founders should be good enough for public school children.

That said, it certainly doesn’t go against what value the Founders found in religion.
 
Roscoe

**You are making the argument that Prayer should be a requirement in Public Schools by trying to link it to the founding fathers. I’m pointing out that yes some were Christians, others held other views. It wasn’t universal. **

There is no inconsistency here. I and no one else has said prayers should be to Jesus. God is worshiped by all religions. As Franklin pointed out at the Constitutional Assembly, and the others agreed, there should be prayer to God before each daily session of the Assembly. What was good enough for the founders should be good enough for public school children.

That said, it certainly doesn’t go against what value the Founders found in religion.
Not all share the same concept of God, have different names or have no god.

Back to Jefferson.

But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no God. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.

-Thomas Jefferson, Notes on Virginia, 1782

I nor my children need Government dictated prayer time.
 
There is no inconsistency here. I and no one else has said prayers should be to Jesus. God is worshiped by all religions.
That doesn’t appear to be true. Remember the thread on Buddhism in which you participated (and started). See here.
Charlemagne II;10666039:
You cannot worship ten thousand gods.
You don’t have to. You can worship as many or as few as you wish.
And those engaged in an orthopraxy without an orthodoxy (such as “cultural jews”) may engage in some religious customs but not worship any gods at all. There are also nontheistic religions, such as Jainism in which their god concept is totally incompatible with your own (ex: gods are not beings that participated in the creation of the universe).
 
It doesn’t matter what Thomas Jefferson thought about religion. He was an odd man. Not the best father or husband to his wife. Certainly nothing to aspire to. Just another politician IMHO. 🤷
 
I get the feeling that there are a few in this thread that would enjoy the movie “Christmas with a capital C”. It’s on Netflix.
I will check it out if you check out…SHUFFLED…(4 stars)…a very good movie indeed…and it has Pugs in it!
 
It doesn’t matter what Thomas Jefferson thought about religion. He was an odd man. Not the best father or husband to his wife. Certainly nothing to aspire to. Just another politician IMHO. 🤷
Do you prefer Madison?
Not withstanding the general progress made within the two last centuries in favour of this branch of liberty, & the full establishment of it, in some parts of our Country, there remains in others a strong bias towards the old error, that without some sort of alliance or coalition between Gov’ & Religion neither can be duly supported: Such indeed is the tendency to such a coalition, and such its corrupting influence on both the parties, that the danger cannot be too carefully guarded against. And in a Gov’ of opinion, like ours, the only effectual guard must be found in the soundness and stability of the general opinion on the subject. **Every new & successful example therefore of a perfect separation between ecclesiastical and civil matters, is of importance. And I have no doubt that every new example, will succeed, as every past one has done, in shewing that religion & Gov will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together; **[James Madison, Letter to Edward Livingston, July 10, 1822, The Writings of James Madison, Gaillard Hunt]
 
Do you prefer Madison?
Probably not.

What we have here is a government that shall not ever hold an ecclesiastical view nor shall it ever deny it. Our constitution is based on a set of principles designed to protect our structure -it has nothing to add or subtract from whatever cultures will come or go within this framework or on this land in any time forever.

Ecclesiastical matters are strictly cultural, and if one culture were to ‘tag’ the dollar bill or the penny then its cultural. If a new culture were to change the word God to Nature, then that’s cultural, but by no means can the governmental framework dictate what culture should or should not prevail. No favoritism allowed… That’s what the founding fathers built for us here whether we like it or not.
 
Probably not.

What we have here is a government that shall not ever hold an ecclesiastical view nor shall it ever deny it. Our constitution is based on a set of principles designed to protect our structure -it has nothing to add or subtract from whatever cultures will come or go within this framework or on this land in any time forever.

Ecclesiastical matters are strictly cultural, and if one culture were to ‘tag’ the dollar bill or the penny then its cultural. If a new culture were to change the word God to Nature, then that’s cultural, but by no means can the governmental framework dictate what culture should or should not prevail. No favoritism allowed… That’s what the founding fathers built for us here whether we like it or not.
I agree with most of your postings…Ps…that’s one cute kid!
 
But our schools most certainly can be and very much are ‘cultural’. They are not part of the “framework”.
 
Probably not.

What we have here is a government that shall not ever hold an ecclesiastical view nor shall it ever deny it. Our constitution is based on a set of principles designed to protect our structure -it has nothing to add or subtract from whatever cultures will come or go within this framework or on this land in any time forever.

Ecclesiastical matters are strictly cultural, and if one culture were to ‘tag’ the dollar bill or the penny then its cultural. If a new culture were to change the word God to Nature, then that’s cultural, but by no means can the governmental framework dictate what culture should or should not prevail. No favoritism allowed… That’s what the founding fathers built for us here whether we like it or not.
Agreed.
Every new & successful example therefore of a perfect separation between ecclesiastical and civil matters, is of importance. And I have no doubt that every new example, will succeed, as every past one has done, in shewing that religion & Gov will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together;
Keeping them separate lets them both keep what is good about them.

I feel the same way about Christian Rock. It makes both of them worse. 😃
 
Roscoe
**
Not withstanding the general progress made within the two last centuries in favour of this branch of liberty, & the full establishment of it, in some parts of our Country, there remains in others a strong bias towards the old error, that without some sort of alliance or coalition between Gov’ & Religion neither can be duly supported: Such indeed is the tendency to such a coalition, and such its corrupting influence on both the parties, that the danger cannot be too carefully guarded against. And in a Gov’ of opinion, like ours, the only effectual guard must be found in the soundness and stability of the general opinion on the subject. Every new & successful example therefore of a perfect separation between ecclesiastical and civil matters, is of importance. And I have no doubt that every new example, will succeed, as every past one has done, in shewing that religion & Gov will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together; [James Madison, Letter to Edward Livingston, July 10, 1822, The Writings of James Madison, Gaillard Hunt] **

Again, you persist in barking up the wrong tree. Madison and Jefferson were against the Church and the State combining as one. That is not at all the same as the state accommodating religious institutions. Indeed, if there was to be an absolute separation of Church and State, the 1st Amendment would not even be possible, since it (the State) is strictly directed to protect the free exercise of religion.

You still haven’t answered the Franklin quote about securing a congressional chaplain. Did Franklin (and the other members of the Constitutional Convention) not make it clear that the practice of prayer was to be encouraged, not denied in public places?

Please answer his remarks below:

"I have lived, Sir, a long time, and the longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see of this truth – that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without his notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without his aid? We have been assured, Sir, in the sacred writings, that except the Lord build the House they labor in vain that build it.’ I firmly believe this; and I also believe that without his concurring aid we shall succeed in this political building no better than the Builders of Babel; We shall be divided by our little partial local interests; our projects will be confounded, and we ourselves shall become a reproach and bye word down to future ages. And what is worse, mankind may hereafter from this unfortunate instance, despair of establishing Government by Human Wisdom and leave it to chance, war, and conquest. "I therefore beg leave to move – that henceforth prayers imploring the assistance of Heaven and its blessings on our deliberations, be held in this Assembly every morning before we proceed to business, and that one or more of the Clergy of this City be requested to officiate in that service.”
 
Roscoe
**
Not withstanding the general progress made within the two last centuries in favour of this branch of liberty, & the full establishment of it, in some parts of our Country, there remains in others a strong bias towards the old error, that without some sort of alliance or coalition between Gov’ & Religion neither can be duly supported: Such indeed is the tendency to such a coalition, and such its corrupting influence on both the parties, that the danger cannot be too carefully guarded against. And in a Gov’ of opinion, like ours, the only effectual guard must be found in the soundness and stability of the general opinion on the subject. Every new & successful example therefore of a perfect separation between ecclesiastical and civil matters, is of importance. And I have no doubt that every new example, will succeed, as every past one has done, in shewing that religion & Gov will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together; [James Madison, Letter to Edward Livingston, July 10, 1822, The Writings of James Madison, Gaillard Hunt] **

Again, you persist in barking up the wrong tree. Madison and Jefferson were against the Church and the State combining as one. That is not at all the same as the state accommodating religious institutions. Indeed, if there was to be an absolute separation of Church and State, the 1st Amendment would not even be possible, since it (the State) is strictly directed to protect the free exercise of religion.

You still haven’t answered the Franklin quote about securing a congressional chaplain. Did Franklin (and the other members of the Constitutional Convention) not make it clear that the practice of prayer was to be encouraged, not denied in public places?

Please answer his remarks below:

"I have lived, Sir, a long time, and the longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see of this truth – that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without his notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without his aid? We have been assured, Sir, in the sacred writings, that except the Lord build the House they labor in vain that build it.’ I firmly believe this; and I also believe that without his concurring aid we shall succeed in this political building no better than the Builders of Babel; We shall be divided by our little partial local interests; our projects will be confounded, and we ourselves shall become a reproach and bye word down to future ages. And what is worse, mankind may hereafter from this unfortunate instance, despair of establishing Government by Human Wisdom and leave it to chance, war, and conquest. "I therefore beg leave to move – that henceforth prayers imploring the assistance of Heaven and its blessings on our deliberations, be held in this Assembly every morning before we proceed to business, and that one or more of the Clergy of this City be requested to officiate in that service.”
I thought I had by quoting Jefferson, Adams and Madison (also a member) The more separate the better. 🤷
 
Roscoe

**I thought I had by quoting Jefferson, Adams and Madison (also a member) The more separate the better. **

That was not an answer. Adams, Jefferson, and Madison never disputed the practice of having a congressional chaplain. The practice continues to this day. So the founders and their successors have never seen a conflict of Church and State when the congressional chaplain prays at each session of Congress.

See below.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaplain_of_the_United_States_House_of_Representatives
 
Roscoe

**I thought I had by quoting Jefferson, Adams and Madison (also a member) The more separate the better. **

That was not an answer. Adams, Jefferson, and Madison never disputed the practice of having a congressional chaplain. The practice continues to this day. So the founders and their successors have never seen a conflict of Church and State when the congressional chaplain prays at each session of Congress.

See below.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaplain_of_the_United_States_House_of_Representatives
It was an answer maybe one you didn’t like. I don’t know. The ones I quoted were very clear in their views. I thought that I was being so as well.

Franklin’s views were not universal nor did the topic of religion take up much of their time. There is one mention of Religion on the constitution - no religious test for office. The next in the bill of rights ratified later. I don’t think it concerned them much except where stated - keep them separate.

It was considered a personal matter. I agree.

[BIBLEDRB]Matthew 6:5-6[/BIBLEDRB]
 
Deist or not, he was a great admirer of Jesus Christ.🙂
I guess I was meaning to dispute your claim that because he was deist he necessarily had to find no use in prayer. He certainly did admire Jesus, who was a man of prayer. I know when he was Governor of Virginia he signed a proclamation for a day of thanksgiving and prayer.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top