STEM, STEMG, Other

[Michael_David]

Fran, no, I am not a doctor… or my approach would have to change to be effective. But even here, we are not being treated like we were back 20 years ago, due to advances in the medical field. So, to me, the medical field is fluid yet, it has not reached the point where no more change will happen. I look at this and tag the word fluid to it.
Yes, some parts are starting to gel, and some parts are solid within the fluid/gel, but as a whole, it’s fluid.
It only takes a birthday for me to know that I too am fluid.

Does this help define what I mean when I say it’s fluid?

 

[CatsAndDogs]

It only takes a birthday for me to know that I too am fluid.

I’m about a quart low.

Most of the time. Sometimes I’m just BRIMMING over, though.

:shamrock2:

 

[warpspeedpetey]

what can we expect to learn from all this. their is no evidence or proofs, nor do you claim to have any either. with out these things what good is your opinion?

in fact i am not sure why anybody keeps up this conversation, the proponents of MOQ might as well be alien abductees for all the evidence that exists to support their theories, in fact, alien abductees have more evidence to back their claims.

without evidence, i can only see these ideas in the same light as fairy tales, thats in fact what MOQ seems to be, a fairy tale. nothing more.

i will now produce my own theory if metaphysics with the exact same justification as MOQ

here goes

the cast of peanuts is the pantheon, of the universe in which only the sensory nerves of my big toe can semi-correctly sense various degrees of the ‘force’
the evil deity linus and his diabolical henchman pigpen seek to strike off the toes of all who dare to sense the force in any relative way, the deities of neutrality, as represented by snoopy and lucy seek to strike off all toes , that they may grow in power, charlie brown doesn’t care and he is having a beer prior to the destruction of peppermint patties sapphic shaggin’ wagon.
our relation to the universe is defined solely by the size of our toes, the importance of which should be obvious to all

should any one here question me, i will not admit that i am wrong as that may expose my actual lack of education, and be a blow to my pride from which i may never recover

i cannot possibly be wrong and even if i were i have not the maturity to admit it. so i will continually debate what the definition of words are until my opponent simply becomes frustrated with my willful ignorance and walks away

thereby proving that i am the most intelligent person here

then i will use that victory to to prop up my dangling self esteem in the real world. where people just wont talk to me and i dont understand why.

i may even be able to lower the my prozac dosage and form actual personal relationships!

 

[CatsAndDogs]

The cast of peanuts is the pantheon, of the universe in which only the sensory nerves of my big toe can semi-correctly sense various degrees of the ‘force’.

Charlie brown doesn’t care and he is having a beer prior to the destruction of peppermint patties sapphic shaggin’ wagon.

I cannot possibly be wrong and even if I were I have not the maturity to admit it. So I will continually debate what the definition of words are until my opponent simply becomes frustrated with my willful ignorance and walks away.

Thereby proving that I am the most intelligent person here. Then I will use that victory to to prop up my dangling self esteem in the real world, where people just wont talk to me and I don’t understand why.

Is Charlie Brown the GOOD deity?

Of course, I will defend anyone’s right to be intransigent, as long as THEY are being intransigent not because someone is making them intransigent, but because they are stubbornly intransigent, as I’m quite proud of my own intransigence and would not like my (correctly used) intransigence taken away, and therefore even if someone is using their intransigence incorrectly (such as by being non-Catholic) I’d not force them to give up their intransigence, as that would be an unCatholic thing to do.

Though, I do reserve the right to be amazed and giggle while pointing as one points at any other (man-made non-personal) freak of nature at those who actually DO use their intransigence incorrectly.

Doing so, quite obviously, CHARITABLY, at all times, of course!

You might have a nifty little gnostic sect that could find at least as much favor with the public as Pastafarianism, you warped and speedy peter, you!

Write it up, and see if the History Channel will dedicate a production crew to the obviously worthy exposition of Peanutsianism!

npatrol:

:shamrock2:

 

[warpspeedpetey]

Is Charlie Brown the GOOD deity?

Of course, I will defend anyone’s right to be intransigent, as long as THEY are being intransigent not because someone is making them intransigent, but because they are stubbornly intransigent, as I’m quite proud of my own intransigence and would not like my (correctly used) intransigence taken away, and therefore even if someone is using their intransigence incorrectly (such as by being non-Catholic) I’d not force them to give up their intransigence, as that would be an unCatholic thing to do.

Though, I do reserve the right to be amazed and giggle while pointing as one points at any other (man-made non-personal) freak of nature at those who actually DO use their intransigence incorrectly.

Doing so, quite obviously, CHARITABLY, at all times, of course!

You might have a nifty little gnostic sect that could find at least as much favor with the public as Pastafarianism, you warped and speedy peter, you!

Write it up, and see if the History Channel will dedicate a production crew to the obviously worthy exposition of Peanutsianism!

npatrol:

:shamrock2:

good?, i am afraid i don’t understand, what is good? can you describe it for me? can you give to me in a sentence? is that good as in the high or low german derivation?

i think maybe you mean the synergystic peanuttiness of the hula and the hoop.

we need to understand the opposite compilation of that synergy may holistically be interpreted as a peppermint pattiness duality of lesbianic tension and muscle carvian dislocation of wholeness

but that goes without saying.

admitted intransigence is hilarious, intransigence for self edification is simply intellectual self abuse sprayed onto the unaware

 

[CatsAndDogs]

good?, i am afraid i don’t understand, what is good? can you describe it for me? can you give to me in a sentence? is that good as in the high or low german derivation?

Oh-Ohhhhhhh,… My Spidey-Sense™ is tingling!

i think maybe you mean the synergystic peanuttiness of the hula and the hoop.

Well, I think I was thinking more of the opposite of the “football snatch” (the Lucy-ferian quasi-Promethian archetypal maneuver) as the meaning of “good”, actually.

we need to understand the opposite compilation of that synergy may holistically be interpreted as a peppermint pattiness duality of lesbianic tension and muscle carvian dislocation of wholeness

Don’t you mean: Carvilleaen Dislocation of Wholeness? View attachment 4602

…and I’d rather not get into the whole rather unsavory PeppermintPattian ethos, if you don’t mind. I’ll wait for it’s clinical handling by the History Channel, thank you.

admitted intransigence is hilarious, intransigence for self edification is simply intellectual self abuse sprayed onto the unaware

Isn’t the act of “spraying onto the unaware” roundly anathematized by either the first or fourth session of the Council of Trent?

But then, what does a Peanutsian care about the Council of Trent!?

:shamrock2:

 

[warpspeedpetey]

Oh-Ohhhhhhh,… My Spidey-Sense™ is tingling!

Well, I think I was thinking more of the opposite of the “football snatch” (the Lucy-ferian quasi-Promethian archetypal maneuver) as the meaning of “good”, actually.

Don’t you mean: Carvilleaen Dislocation of Wholeness? View attachment 4602

…and I’d rather not get into the whole rather unsavory PeppermintPattian ethos, if you don’t mind. I’ll wait for it’s clinical handling by the History Channel, thank you.

Isn’t the act of “spraying onto the unaware” roundly anathematized by either the first or fourth session of the Council of Trent?

But then, what does a Peanutsian care about the Council of Trent!?

:shamrock2:

 

[warpspeedpetey]

Well, I think I was thinking more of the opposite of the “football snatch” (the Lucy-ferian quasi-Promethian archetypal maneuver) as the meaning of “good”, actually.

Don’t you mean: Carvilleaen Dislocation of Wholeness? View attachment 4602

…and I’d rather not get into the whole rather unsavory PeppermintPattian ethos, if you don’t mind. I’ll wait for it’s clinical handling by the History Channel, thank you.

Isn’t the act of “spraying onto the unaware” roundly anathematized by either the first or fourth session of the Council of Trent?

But then, what does a Peanutsian care about the Council of Trent!?

:shamrock2:

the term ‘opposite’ causes waveform disturbance in its confrontantionalist sense causing the understanding of that verbal pattern, in this space, in this time, and only for this moment of not-time to mean ‘rutabaga’, only to me, of course.

no i believe that the council of trent gave jurisdiction to the town council of waupeseepa wisconsin, who dealt with ‘spraying the unaware’ in penal code ‘whythehelldidyoudothat’ ? sometime around 1983

as to the situation with peppermint patty, i believe that you are right, the history channel may be the best biographers, i have noticed that they hold to a strictly dan brownian orthodoxy in their treatment of other faiths, i am sure they could do as well for the peanutians

how can we understand the carvillean dislocation of wholeness with out its countering matalinian purgation of disloyalty?

 

[Fran65]

Fran65 has dissolved…into fluidic space where I intend/value/ compel/ruttabagoed to live with species 8472. The borg implants just did not go with my shoes…

Wait, I’m in the wrong universe…

Hey Snoopy Get Me Out of Here!

I value Snoopy.

I may just add his technological and biological diversity to my own. Resistance is futile…

Assimilate, assimilate…

 

[JDaniel]

what can we expect to learn from all this. their is no evidence or proofs, nor do you claim to have any either. with out these things what good is your opinion?

in fact i am not sure why anybody keeps up this conversation, the proponents of MOQ might as well be alien abductees for all the evidence that exists to support their theories, in fact, alien abductees have more evidence to back their claims.

without evidence, i can only see these ideas in the same light as fairy tales, thats in fact what MOQ seems to be, a fairy tale. nothing more.

i will now produce my own theory if metaphysics with the exact same justification as MOQ

here goes

the cast of peanuts is the pantheon, of the universe in which only the sensory nerves of my big toe can semi-correctly sense various degrees of the ‘force’
the evil deity linus and his diabolical henchman pigpen seek to strike off the toes of all who dare to sense the force in any relative way, the deities of neutrality, as represented by snoopy and lucy seek to strike off all toes , that they may grow in power, charlie brown doesn’t care and he is having a beer prior to the destruction of peppermint patties sapphic shaggin’ wagon.
our relation to the universe is defined solely by the size of our toes, the importance of which should be obvious to all

should any one here question me, i will not admit that i am wrong as that may expose my actual lack of education, and be a blow to my pride from which i may never recover

i cannot possibly be wrong and even if i were i have not the maturity to admit it. so i will continually debate what the definition of words are until my opponent simply becomes frustrated with my willful ignorance and walks away

thereby proving that i am the most intelligent person here

then i will use that victory to to prop up my dangling self esteem in the real world. where people just wont talk to me and i dont understand why.

i may even be able to lower the my prozac dosage and form actual personal relationships!

See,s a bit self-serving.

JD