Steubenville-Really??

  • Thread starter Thread starter T_More
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh you have got to be kidding. Emotions are a GIFT, and like any other gift need to be used the correct away according to God’s purpose, not kept in a bottle. Using them in worship is valid.
 
Catholics, however, should be ruled at all times by right reason, and the emotions kept in check. It is a characteristic of the fallen nature of man that our reason is weakened and our passion and emotions strengthened such that we must work hard to keep them in check.

In other words, such “worship services” appeal (and are designed to appeal) primarily to our fallen nature and, as such are profoundly uncatholic in their goals and motivations.
Nah, that’s not catholicism, that’s Vulcanism. You’ve watched too much Star Trek. 😛

In seriousness, you are correct to point out that enthusiasm cannot be the basis for our faith. But such forms of praise and expression do make for some nice spice in life. I’d meet you as far as agreeing that “Enthusiasm” by Msgr Knox should be required reading for anybody involved in the Charismatic Movement. But I won’t go so far as to condemn enthusiastic expressions of faith and praise altogether. Just excessive reliance on them.
 
There was a thread sometime ago about this.

Franciscan University does not offer the EF Mass. The EF Mass that is offered in Steubenvilleis at a parish that is very close to the campus.

That is unless the Franciscans changed their minds and started offering it.

The thread was a complaint thread against FU because it did not offer the EF when some students wanted it.
I don’t know how old that thread is. FU does offer an EF mass on campus, in their chapel:

franciscan.edu/chapelministries/schedule/
 
Oh you have got to be kidding. Emotions are a GIFT, and like any other gift need to be used the correct away according to God’s purpose, not kept in a bottle. Using them in worship is valid.
I did not say that Catholics may not feel or show emotion.

However, Catholic worship does not seek primarily to provoke an emotional response, but that is the primary goal of “charismatic” services like the one in the video.

Anytime emotion rules reason, that person is in a disordered state.
 
Well, I met a friend I hadn’t seen in over a month at Mass at the Church he has been attending lately.

I came in a few minutes late. When I walked in the church, I saw where he was sitting so I went and sat next to him.

I offered a smile and he offered me a stoic, barely-perceptible nod of the head.

Really? It would have been disrespectful to smile or even mouth hello?

:confused:
 
Well, I’ll predict right now that this thread will get moved or closed since this has nothing to do with the Traditional Catholicism sub-forum.
How representative is this of Franciscan University of Steubenville?

youtube.com/watch?v=d-Eg7via3q8&feature=channel&list=UL

If this is pretty much the way the spirituality is there, oy vey…
Because Protestants would definitley use a San Damiano Cross, right? :confused:

There’s only 1 thing I see as problematic, and that was the priest leading the p&w and stuff from behind the monstrance (Blessed Sacrament) during adoration. That is distracting and sends the wrong message as to who’s the centre of attention at that time.

CCO does similar events at Rise Up each year, a Holy Hour with Adoration, praise and worship (With a worship band far to the side, opposite side of the stage width-wise. The songs chosen are usually on the new side though from artists like Hillsong and Chris Tomlin/Passion Conferences and of course Matt Maher) and confession (and plenty of time given for silent reflection too). It’s usually the best night of the conference.
Maybe I missed something, but it seemed like everyone was kneeling. And on a hard floor. It seemed like it was Exposition, when there is normally a song or prayer recited.

What were you looking for?🤷
Complete silence with capital punishment for making noise. 😉
The problem with this stuff is that it is designed to appeal to the emotions rather than reason, even to the point of encouraging people to to be overcome by and ruled by their emotions, at least for the duration of the “worship service”.

Catholics, however, should be ruled at all times by right reason, and the emotions kept in check. It is a characteristic of the fallen nature of man that our reason is weakened and our passion and emotions strengthened such that we must work hard to keep them in check.

In other words, such “worship services” appeal (and are designed to appeal) primarily to our fallen nature and, as such are profoundly uncatholic in their goals and motivations.
Do you only worship God with your reason? Are we not called to love God with all our hearts, all our souls, all our minds, and all our strengths (this quote was previously in my signature), and is love not an emotion? Are we not called to be child-like with our Lord and Saviour?

Frankly speaking, reason is only enough to get you to go through the motions. Using your emotions in your worship of God is to open yourself up fully and totally to God, it is to give yourself up to God. I can tell you from personal experience, reason only kept me from doing that.
However, Catholic worship does not seek primarily to provoke an emotional response, but that is the primary goal of “charismatic” services like the one in the video.
Source? Or alternatively we’ll just relegate this to your opinion that the rest of us are free to disagree with.
Anytime emotion rules reason, that person is in a disordered state.
For this one I will demand that you produce an authoritative source to back this up. Saying that something is disordered is a serious charge and requires justification.
 
Do you only worship God with your reason? Are we not called to love God with all our hearts, all our souls, all our minds, and all our strengths (this quote was previously in my signature), and is love not an emotion? Are we not called to be child-like with our Lord and Saviour?

Frankly speaking, reason is only enough to get you to go through the motions. Using your emotions in your worship of God is to open yourself up fully and totally to God, it is to give yourself up to God. I can tell you from personal experience, reason only kept me from doing that.
All of this is awesome!! 👍
What I have highlighted- I AGREE 100%!
“Complete surrender” is ANYTHING but logical
and if you really think about it-
it is the ultimate emotion- FAITH!!

You will make a fine priest someday, God willing! 🙂
 
I did not say that Catholics may not feel or show emotion.

However, Catholic worship does not seek primarily to provoke an emotional response, but that is the primary goal of “charismatic” services like the one in the video.

Anytime emotion rules reason, that person is in a disordered state.
I agree with you that if one’s emotions are actually ruling one’s reason then they are in a disordered state. (For those of you who don’t know, this is a necessary conclusion from the most basic principles of Thomistic philosophy). However, I would like to point out that feeling stron emotions does not equate to having ones emotions or passions rule ones reason. If said emotions are in line with the dictates of reason and ones reason sees that they are good and appropriate for a certain occasion then there is nothing wrong with having an intense emotional experience. If you want to use this principle as a charge against charismatics you must show that the charismatic movement is in fact ordered towards the disordered state of emotions ruling reason rather than the perfectly acceptable and good state of experiencing emotions in line with reason.

Also, I second the request for evidence that the primary goal of charismatic worship is to evoke emotion, let alone disordered emotion. As I understand it the primary end is worship of God. It is done through a particular mode, through being in touch with ones emotions, but the end of the worship is not to evoke emotion. It is an important distinction to make.
 
Sorry, its too late to edit.

I just realized that I should add for those who are unaware, the entire theology of St. Thomas is based on his philosophy and comes highly recomended by the Church. So, while I don’t have an exact quote for you from an official Church document, the Church’s high endorsement of St. Thomas’ theology should be sufficient reason to seriously consider the idea that emotions ruling reason is a disordered state. Don’t worry, I’m well aware that not everything St. Thomas said or wrote is correct, but the fact that this is a necessary conclusions from his founding principles gives it **a lot **more weight than some abstract conclusion he comes to much further down the line of reasoning (such as his take on the immaculate conception). 🙂
 
40.png
Oneofthewomen:
All of this is awesome!! 👍
What I have highlighted- I AGREE 100%!
“Complete surrender” is ANYTHING but logical
and if you really think about it-
it is the ultimate emotion- FAITH!!

You will make a fine priest someday, God willing! 🙂

Faith isn’t an emotion. Neither is love at its heart. Both produce emotions at times but at other times they don’t.
 
Do you only worship God with your reason? Are we not called to love God with all our hearts, all our souls, all our minds, and all our strengths (this quote was previously in my signature), and is love not an emotion?
Actually, it’s not. Ask Mother Theresa who loved God for decades by consistently choosing self-sacrifice without a fuzzy feeling. Thankfully, God does give most of us loving emotions toward Him at times, and allows us to feel His love through consolations at other times.

I’m willing to give these charismatics the benefit of the doubt, i.e. that their they are not just chasing a kind of emotional high. I hope as you go through seminary you will consider giving trads the benefit of the doubt that they are actively participating at Mass even though they often appear to be doing something else.
 
Sorry, its too late to edit.

I just realized that I should add for those who are unaware, the entire theology of St. Thomas is based on his philosophy and comes highly recomended by the Church. So, while I don’t have an exact quote for you from an official Church document, the Church’s high endorsement of St. Thomas’ theology should be sufficient reason to seriously consider the idea that emotions ruling reason is a disordered state. Don’t worry, I’m well aware that not everything St. Thomas said or wrote is correct, but the fact that this is a necessary conclusions from his founding principles gives it **a lot **more weight than some abstract conclusion he comes to much further down the line of reasoning (such as his take on the immaculate conception). 🙂
Don’t have your quote handy but have something better…

Decree of Approval of some theses contained in the Doctrine of St. Thomas Aquinas and proposed to the Teachers of Philosophy

After our most Holy Father Pius X ordered in the Motu Proprio Doctoris Angelici, on June 29, 1914, that in all schools of philosophy the principles and main teachings of Thomas Aquinas be held, some teachers from various institutions proposed some theses for this Sacred Congregation to examine, which theses they had been accustomed to teach and defend as being those of the Holy Teacher [St.Thomas], especially in metaphysics.

This Sacred Congregation, having duly examined the aforementioned theses and having presented them to the Holy Father, by the mandate of His Holiness, declares that they clearly contain the principles and more important thoughts of the holy Doctor [St. Thomas].

XXI.

Intellectum sequitur, non praecedit, voluntas, quae necessario appetit id quod sibi praesentatur tamquam bonum ex omni parte explens appetitum, sed inter plura bona, quae iudicio mutabili appetenda proponuntur, libere eligit. Sequitur proinde electio iudicium practicum ultimum; at quod sit ultimum, voluntas efficit.

The will follows the intellect. The will does not precede the intellect. The will necessarily desires that which is presented to it as a good that in every way can satisfy desire, but among the many goods that are proposed to it as desirable by a judgement that is subject to change, the will freely chooses. Thus, a choice follows the last practical judgement, and the will makes that judgement into the last one.

May not state ‘emotion’ per se but emotions are acts of the will either by defective intellect when one does not desire the highest good of which is desired or functional intellect when one executes proper judgment according to goodness of which is desired. If one places emotion before intellect, they violate the principles of the Church who states by this Congregation and previous Doctors of the Church that will follows the intellect. In summary to the subject: if one simply wishes to worship a certain way, as this youtube video has shown, and does not place wisdom above whim and intellect above will, one would act contrary to the principles of goodness and reason. For in goodness we objectively observe variation of greater and lesser and with reason the assent to what is greater. Ergo, worship is measurable in form and whatever lacks in form is defective of its actuality.
 
This is not my favored way to worship, as I am more inhibited. But I think it is wonderful to see Catholic people praising God in this way (or any other way for that matter). I really don’t see why anyone should be upset. I’d like to see the reasoning…theologically.
I have watched the video 4 times now. I see nothing wrong with it except a couple of the ladies should stick to dark colored pants.😉

I, too am more inhibited, though, I wish I weren’t. So for us introverts, I will offer this video. And yes, it makes me tear up:sad_yes: Sad, but in a joyful way.
Guess I 'm not 100% in control of my emotions. So shoot me!

Oh and if you pray twice by singing, I bet you pray 4 times by clapping and dancing.!

youtube.com/watch?v=aJ4tEFPuhYI&feature=related
 
FSU has a lot of good things going on. They also have a lot of problems. That’s not suprising since FSU is made of people, and all of us have lots problems.

Chief positives I’ve seen from FSU:
  • a sincere enthusiasm for the Faith
  • great devotion to the Blessed Sacrament
  • a very active group of students who pray for an end to abortion.
Chief negatives I’ve seen from FSU:
  • very mixed up theology. I know people with advanced degrees in theology from there that are lacking in knowing basics of the faith.
    -an over focus on emotion at the expense of reason.
Basically, the general tone of the place is “neo-conservative” Catholicism as opposed to traditional Catholicism. Rick Santorum is the best thing since sliced bread on campus. Being anti-contraception and anti-abortion are important. In fact they are essential. However, there is much more to the faith than that. Their recent news story in relation to “cancelling student insurance” out of conscience concerns over the HHS mandate was downright dishonest.

As I said, I do see real positives about the place, and it has had a positive influence on my own life and faith. It’s much better than most “catholic” universities in the US, but that is more of a condemnation of the others than praise for FSU. I would be very hestitant to send my children there.

Pax
 
As an aside, I think anyone interested in this thread may like to read the following blog post: patheos.com/blogs/badcatholic/
If you belong to any religion besides Judaism or Christianity, having a religious experience is simple stuff. You obtain it. If you’re a Buddhist, simply get better and better at meditation and complete separation from earthly desires, and you’ll obtain a supernatural experience of peace. If you’re a Muslim, keep on the Straight Way, look “in the heavens and the earth [for the] signs for those who believe” (Qur’an 45:3-5) and you’ll find them. If you’re a Wiccan, draw the circle, light the candles, call down the spirits, and have your religious experience.
If you’re Christian — and we’re all here for you, I promise — then you’re screwed…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top