P
ProVobis
Guest
As did Pope Pius X. But then he didn’t have to deal with translations, good or bad, old or new.Not until she passes out. Remember, Vatican II wanted “full, conscious**,** and active participation”.
As did Pope Pius X. But then he didn’t have to deal with translations, good or bad, old or new.Not until she passes out. Remember, Vatican II wanted “full, conscious**,** and active participation”.
My parish church seats 1000. I can sit in a different section and not hear them.
The people who change or add to the Mass at my parish do so LOUDLY. It’s all about bringing attention to themselves after all. If we had a crying room, I might find relief there but we do not so we all suffer.
My parish seats 1070. Are at least that’s what the fire signs say. I have never sat anywhere were people weren’t doing their darndest to bring attention to themselves with their comments.My parish church seats 1000. I can sit in a different section and not hear them.
However, unless someone specifically states that they speak loudly to bring attention to themselves, we don’t know that. Someone who is hard of hearing often speaks loudly because they can’t hear themselves well to modulate their voice.
SERIOUSLY??? When he gives a “dare you to say anything” look? It’s pretty obvious that he’s being rebellious. I’d tell the priest, let him know who it is and then the priest can talk to him. I still miss a couple things myself but to say it loud and be disrupting the liturgy is not about “I can’t see the pew card” It’s been 6 months.If I remember correctly, the pew cards I’ve seen in the Archdiocese of Philly, when I go to visit my mom, are pretty small and difficult to read. I haven’t been to that church since the new translation hit, so I don’t know if they are the same cards, but I had trouble reading them and there was no way my mom could. If they are an older couple, they may not be able to read them. I actually had copies mode of the one’s put out by my diocese (it was marked as copyrighted, but freely distributable) and gave them to my mom for her use and her friends.
I think the charitable thing to do, is to assume they don’t know the new translation, but are fervent in their participation - and that’s the best they can do. Then, next time you go, look out for them and sit at least 6 pews away. And if you can STILL hear them - offer the mass and communion for them.
oh dear, the good thing is that there are a lot of parishes in the area, so if this is a constant problem, you can look elsewhere. I’m a member of St. Helena’s in Blue Bell myself, and I’ve never had this problem at any of the masses I’ve attended. (usually 11, but sometimes Saturday at 5). The pew cards at St. Helena’s are in something like size 20 font, which could help with the reading factor. Your location says Plymouth Meeting, have you tried Epiphany? It might be closer, and the parishioners there are usually pretty good.
Of course, no one has ever misinterpreted a “look.”SERIOUSLY??? When he gives a “dare you to say anything” look? It’s pretty obvious that he’s being rebellious.
All too often the hypocrisy of special pleading falsely poses as charitableness. If they were hard of hearing then their timing would be off. But it isn’t. Therefore it’s rebellion. And I think most of us have been around long enough to know it when we see it.Unless this person tells someone he is doing it to be rebellious, we don’t know that. No one has yet confirmed that he’s not hard of hearing and being loud for that reason.
Outstanding! You almost made me pee in my pants!Not until she passes out. Remember, Vatican II wanted “full, conscious**,** and active participation”.
I’m thinking that was a jokeYes, and maybe smack her on the head with the missal until she passes out.
Do you understand what Mass is about? :banghead:
Probably you are correct; however, here on CAF I know that some people would think of doing that seriously. I think that emoticons really help when there is some sarcasm that might be misinterpreted.I’m thinking that was a joke
I go to daily mass, I love the new translation, and I still find myself saying the old words at times. And I have yet to memorize the new words to the Gloria and the creed.As we are about to enter the 6th month of using the new translation, IMO, there is NO EXCUSE for anyone to be using the old version. I don’t care how old one person is, 6 months is more than enough time to adapt to the new translation.
I apologize. I didn’t realize that you have direct, personal knowledge of this couple. And I **seriously ** resent your charge of “hypocrisy.”All too often the hypocrisy of special pleading falsely poses as charitableness. If they were hard of hearing then their timing would be off. But it isn’t. Therefore it’s rebellion. And I think most of us have been around long enough to know it when we see it.
Me too. But by the OP’s standards when I recite my mistakes at an level that most people can hear, I’m rebelling.I go to daily mass, I love the new translation, and I still find myself saying the old words at times. And I have yet to memorize the new words to the Gloria and the creed.
Not necessarily so. My SIL has a hearing aid. Her timing isn’t “off” when it comes to conversations or prompts. But she speaks at a much louder volume in everyday conversations than the rest of us. If its a particularly “bad” day with her health, sometimes she compensates for her hearing loss in ways that probably other people would be quick to say she’s being obnoxious or stubborn.All too often the hypocrisy of special pleading falsely poses as charitableness. If they were hard of hearing then their timing would be off. But it isn’t. Therefore it’s rebellion. And I think most of us have been around long enough to know it when we see it.
Agree.All too often the hypocrisy of special pleading falsely poses as charitableness. If they were hard of hearing then their timing would be off. But it isn’t. Therefore it’s rebellion. And I think most of us have been around long enough to know it when we see it.
Not until she passes out. Remember, Vatican II wanted “full, conscious**,** and active participation”.
[Following the side rant] It reminds me of the mentality of children. “Yeah but what if the man in the windowless van really did lose his puppy?” It’s not charity, it’s naivety, which is a sin.Agree.
Side rant.