" Is the author arrogant and disdainful because he does not hold your view?"
Fix, no, that’s not it at all.
I play piano for a 100 year-old Italian parish. Many of the people in the parish are elderly, definitely pre-Vatican II.
I’ve seen pictures of their choir–60 people at one point, mainly men. The people have told me magnificent stories about a fantastic musical heritage in the parish.
**I’ve been told over and over again by these dear elderly people that they prefer contemporary music in the Mass. **
One elderly gentleman kisses me every week (his wife is right there!) and says thank you for the music.
This is the parish I mentioned that wants to hire a music director (their director quit when he turned 80; he couldn’t walk up the stairs to get into the choir loft).
The pastor of that parish told me that they want a music director who not only knows and loves the “old” music, but also the “new” music.
The impression I received from the article you posted is that if the gentleman who wrote the article were hired, he would come into this parish and toss into the trash all the music that these elderly people dearly love.
He would label their favorite songs “sappy, feminist, confusing, heretical, irreverent, secular humanist.”
Because a friend of mine plays organ for all their funerals, (and there are MANY–once they had 14 in a single week)–I happen to know that at almost every funeral, “On Eagle’s Wings” is played. It has become almost a tradition in that parish.
But the gentleman who wrote the article would tell these dear old people that they can’t be sung to their eternal rest with this “drippingly saccharine” hymn.
The reason the gentleman in this article keeps losing jobs is that he isn’t demonstrating Christian love and charity to the people in the parishes where he is hired to SERVE.
When someone says, “I love that song!” and he says, “That song is 'drippingly saccharine,” an insult has been delivered to the song-lover.
Even though the gentleman means the “music,’ the song-lover doesn’t hear it that way. What he/she hears is, “YOU are a fool becase you actually like (gag) that drippingly saccharine” hymn.”
The other thing that people hear is, “Your priest must be a total numbskull to allow such awful music in the Mass.”
That’s not very nice. Actually, it’s mean and arrogant.
I feel this way when people insult “Gather Us In.” This song made me cry the first time I ever heard it because I thought it was so beautiful, uplifting, cheerful, yet solemn.
My husband and I had been ousted from our Protestant church, and this song made me remember that God wants to “gather us in to His Church.” It made me WANT to become Catholic.
I actually wrote all the words down on a napkin and carried it around with me for weeks and read it as encouragement.
But then I read comments like the one in the article: “We sing the words “gather us in” seven times, extolling the virtues of “we”…”
What this says to me is that I am stupid, undiscerning, self-centered, unspiritual, and musically inept.
I hear the gentleman calling me a fool, even if that is not his intent.
Jesus said that if we call someone a fool, we are in danger of hell-fire.
Another song that I absolutely love is “Here I Am, Lord.” This was the song that was playing at the Rite of Election at our Cathedral. One of my heroes, Bishop Thomas Doran, was waiting at the front of the Cathedral to welcome the thousand of us who were coming into the Church that year, and the whole time, the organist (pipe organ) and Cathedral Choir were playing and singing “Here I Am, Lord.”
According to the gentleman who wrote the article, “Here I Am, Lord” is self-centered, empty, sentimental, no reverence, etc."
Look up Bishop Thomas Doran. You’ll find that he’s one of the CHAMPIONS of correct liturgy in the Mass.
Is HE “self-centered, empty, sentimental, irreverent, etc.” because he allows “Here I Am, Lord” to be sung at the Rite of Election? And is he a fool because the theme song on his weekly radio show is “Gather Us In?”
Fix, the gentleman who wrote that article will never, ever find a parish to serve in until he puts PEOPLE ahead of rules.
Our Lord Jesus Christ never put rules and regulations ahead of people. He even broke the Sabbath to heal. LOVE is the most important thing, not “liturgy.”
The author of the article has to learn that he can’t heap abuse upon people’s beloved music and expect them to support him. He will capture more flies with honey than vinegar. **I’m NOT saying that he should abandon attempts to bring good music to parishes. Good for him!
**
But he has to learn to do it in such a way as to build people up. He won’t get far insulting their music and hence, by proxy, insulting them.