T
Traces95z
Guest
Finally, someone who understands context. Thanks for your support!
Last edited:
Thatâs the problem right here : youâre indirectly comparing a spouse to dinner - to something you can use to fill your needs. Thatâs complete objectification of another human being.If you were hungry and I told you, âGo eat a big dinner, that will cure your problem.â Objectively speaking, it would cure the problem for most people. Now you can say there might be some or even many people who would still be hungry, but objectively speaking, telling someone to eat a big meal would be good advice.
Youâre playing handball against the drapes here, Father.Iâm posting my informed professional opinion, sure.
I think youâre just wrong, though. One mans opinion. Marriage, and with it the availability of licit sex, does not âcureâ masturbation. People struggle with masturbation for a multitude of reasons. Not to mention that even within a marriage there are going to be times when your spouse is unavailable, unable or simply not in the mood. Youâll still need your ability to control yourself post marriage.Problem is he didnât attempt to understand what I meant. Instead he and others just told me I gave horrible advice. Even after I exhaustively defended my comments against the many presumptions and generalities, there was still no attempt to say, âokay, thatâs what you meant.â
Sorry but i donât believe it is true.In catholic confession, a long time ago, a priest told me âDavid for the most part there are two kinds of men. Those who say they masturbate and those who lieâ.