Stormy Daniels spills all about her alleged affair with Donald Trump on '60 Minutes'

  • Thread starter Thread starter exnihilo
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
As has been stated ad nauseum ,the reason Trump was elected is due to the nambey pambey usual candidates he ran against.More importantly,he was elected to keep THE most corrupt candidate,HC out of office. No one has ever defended his moral defeciencies.
 
Bill but why did the mainstream media decide to cover this story when they don’t stories of Democrat politicians and their consensual liaisons
  1. The Gennifer Flowers story, as flimsy as it was, was covered.
  2. I hope it is noticable that we are in new territory here with pubic affairs (MM), Playboy bunnies, and porn stars.
 
Are you saying the media didn’t cover Clinton’s affairs? lol if so
 
It wasn’t all about The Donald’s sex life last night.

A former FEC chair appointed by a Republican president did say during the interview that to him it looks like the Trump attorney violated the law by paying hush money so close to the election to a Trump mistress if Donald John Trump didn’t reimburse him the hush money.

And If he did this on behalf of Donald Trump, it is a coordinated, illegal contribution for the purpose of influencing the election.

 
Last edited:
40.png
Ridgerunner:
All “journalism”, it seems, is “tabloid journalism” now.
Well, let’s see:
  1. Is it relevant to voters that Donald Trump had sex with a porn star? Maybe, maybe not. I like the people I deal with to not be adulterers, but that’s me.
  2. Is it relevant to voters that Donald Trump had sex with a porn star right after his wife had a baby? Maybe, maybe not. I pretty much think of any man doing that as scum, but I don’t expect everyone to have my sense of morality.
  3. Is it relevant to voters that Donald Trump had unprotected sex with a porn star? Maybe, maybe not. It seems that this will result in an abortion, which I am against.
  4. Is it relevant to voters that Donald Trump paid off a porn star? Maybe, maybe not. I mean, as far as I’m concerned, if he had the affair, he’s already scum by 2), but maybe this tilts the balance for some.
  5. Is it relevant to voters that Donald Trump may have paid off a porn star with campaign funds? Maybe, maybe not. Certainly illegal, but I don’t know if every voter cares about that.
  6. Is it relevant that some close to Trump apparently threatened Daniels? Maybe, maybe not. I’m sure a lot like the fake tough guy persona. I don’t, but I already think he is scum if he had an affair, based on 2).
Fair enough. And on point #5, given that not every voter seems to care that Vlad Putin tried to influence our election, you may be onto something that not every voter will care if an associate of Donald Trump paid off a Trump porn star mistress just before the election or whether or not Donald John Trump reimbursed him for the pay-off.
 
You believe the porn star who wants money and the media that hates Trump, and that’s your prerogative.
 
Well we knew DJT was far from a saint when we voted for him.
Personally my primary pick was Ted Cruz who for all appearances was a good family man and evangelical Christian. Of course the left would have been dragging him through the mud as well had he won the nomination and/or the WH… although they likely wouldn’t have had as much to work with.
That said, while I knew that DJT was lewd, crude, a brawler, definitely not my cup of tea personality wise, and I wasn’t sure I even trusted him to keep his promises once in office I am very pleased with how he has fought for the American people and what he has done while in office, especially for Right to Life.
Sure, thrice married, cheated on both ex wifes, probably cheated on his current one(if this story is true.)
So did allegedly JRK and LBJ and Robert Kennedy, and as we know for sure Bill Clinton.
And I don’t remember any on the left having any trouble with them.
The difference is those men were politicians who knew how to speak publically and whose public personas were likely quite different from their private ones.
Plus, back then, the media wasn’t as tabloid as it is now.
No one has so far been able to prove that Trump has committed any crimes, while in office or campaigning.
If it is proven then we’ll see.
I like how he fights for the American people.
In my opinion, HRC was part of the “swamp” and had no intention of helping working class people, like myself.
 
Last edited:
And I don’t remember any on the left having any trouble with them.
There are some big gaps in your memory.
In my opinion, HRC was part of the “swamp” and had no intention of helping working class people, like myself.
Thank God Trump brought so many billionaires into his government to help working class people.
 
Last edited:
Some cults, like Jansenism and Puritanism, are every bit as popular today as they ever were. And so is pretending virtue.
 
Thank God Trump brought so many billionaires into his government to help working class people.
Richard Trumpka at least pretends to be working class, and I saw him on tv purporting to advise the administration.
 
Is it relevant to voters that Donald Trump had sex with a porn star right after his wife had a baby? Maybe, maybe not. I pretty much think of any man doing that as scum, but I don’t expect everyone to have my sense of morality.
I really love all the feigned concern for Melania and Barron.
 
Not true. We are constantly reminded there is no proof that he assaulted or committed adultery or even had unprotected sex, which of course implies openness to pregnancy.
 
When Joe Scarborough doesn’t believe Daniels, that says a lot about whether anyone else should.
It is an interesting argument. I hope that you and others realize that this argument applies to Gennifer Flowers and Juanita Brodderick.
 
In the case of Daniels, I imagine we’d have to call them rich.
 
I’m not arguing about anything. I’m wondering why the mainstream media would have an interview with this person. This seems like National Enquirer material because it is.

Obviously the mainstream media is intent on disparaging Trump’s reputation. That wouldn’t be so bad if they did it equally. They should have interviewed the man who said he had homosexual sex with Obama if they wanted to at least appear fair.
I don’t understand why they wanted to run the interview on Palm Sunday evening. I didn’t watch the interview. I was at Mass. This is Holy Week. It is like Satan is trying to take the focus off of Jesus this week.
 
She said she had sex one time with the Donald. We now call this an “affair”? That kind of thing used to be called a “one night stand.” Either way, it’s TMI. Yuck. 🤢
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top